19.01.2013 Views

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 introduction to the international criminal court<br />

human rights treaties on this basis, although the compatibility of such reservations<br />

with the object and purpose of human rights instruments would be<br />

debatable.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re may be competing requests <strong>for</strong> the same individual, one from the<br />

<strong>Court</strong> and the other from another State seeking extradition. This of course<br />

raises the issue of complementarity, because the application by the State <strong>for</strong><br />

extradition indicates that there is in fact a national justice system seeking to<br />

exercise its jurisdiction over the offender and the offence. In such cases, the<br />

custodial State may not extradite the person until the <strong>Court</strong> has ruled that<br />

the case is inadmissible. 68 It may also confront a State with two incompatible<br />

legal obligations, that of extradition pursuant to the applicable extradition<br />

treaty and that of surrender in accordance with the Statute. Here, the Statute<br />

does not impose an affirmative duty on the custodial State to proceed with<br />

surrender to the <strong>Court</strong>. Rather, the custodial State is entitled to assess a<br />

number of relevant factors, including the respective dates of the requests,<br />

whether the requesting State may have territorial or personal jurisdiction<br />

over the offender, and the possibility of subsequent surrender from the <strong>Court</strong><br />

to the requesting State. 69<br />

A person who has been unlawfully arrested or detained is entitled to<br />

compensation. 70 This right goes beyond existing international human rights<br />

obligations, which generally provide <strong>for</strong> some <strong>for</strong>m of indemnification only<br />

when there has been a genuine miscarriage of justice. <strong>The</strong> Appeals Chamber<br />

of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong> Tribunal <strong>for</strong> Rwanda has ruled that a person<br />

unlawfully detained may be entitled to a stay of proceedings and release,<br />

in extreme cases. Alternatively, in less severe situations, if the individual is<br />

acquitted, then financial compensation is in order, and if the individual is<br />

convicted he or she should receive a reduction in sentence. 71<br />

Appearance be<strong>for</strong>e the <strong>Court</strong> and interim release<br />

<strong>An</strong> accused may appear be<strong>for</strong>e the <strong>Court</strong> in one of two ways: by surrender<br />

from a State where he or she has been apprehended; or by voluntarily presenting<br />

him or herself pursuant to a summons. A hearing is to be held be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

the Pre-Trial Chamber, which must satisfy itself that the accused has been<br />

68 Rome Statute, Art. 90. 69 Ibid., Art. 90(6).<br />

70 Ibid., Art. 85(1); Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Rules 173–175.<br />

71 Barayagwiza v. Prosecutor (Case No. ICTR-97-19-AR72), Decisions of 3 November 1999 and<br />

31 March 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!