30.01.2013 Views

152 153 Intestinal Disease Meeting Berlin 2006 - Dr. Falk Pharma ...

152 153 Intestinal Disease Meeting Berlin 2006 - Dr. Falk Pharma ...

152 153 Intestinal Disease Meeting Berlin 2006 - Dr. Falk Pharma ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. Schölmerich<br />

Only a minority of patients profits<br />

from the “Top Down” concept<br />

Not in favor of this concept was J. Schölmerich<br />

(Regensburg). In his opinion, the proponents of<br />

the “Top Down” concept overlook the fact that<br />

only a minority of patients do not benefit from<br />

the currently standard “Step Up” paradigm. The<br />

more aggressive “Top Down” approach would<br />

represent an unnecessary risk for these patients<br />

and also burden the medical insurance system<br />

with unjustifiable increased costs. According to<br />

J. Schölmerich, the goal of treatment of IBD consists<br />

of reducing patients’ symptoms, inducing<br />

and maintaining disease remission and thus preventing<br />

renewed acute disease flares and structural<br />

changes. “These objectives,” he said, “are<br />

realized in the majority of patients using the<br />

standard therapy.”<br />

Start with medications of proven<br />

efficacy<br />

The “Step Up” model begins with medications<br />

of proven efficacy, such as mesalazine in ulcerative<br />

colitis and, in Crohn’s disease, of this medication<br />

together with the locally acting steroid<br />

budesonide and, where indicated, antibiotics.<br />

Only when these medications do not prove effective,<br />

said J. Schölmerich, should patients be<br />

started on medications, such as systemic corticosteroids,<br />

azathioprine or even methotrexate,<br />

Congress Short Report <strong>Falk</strong> Symposium<br />

that are stronger but also are associated with<br />

greater risk of side effects. If patients fail to respond<br />

to these medications with remission or if<br />

they relapse the next step can be administration<br />

of the TNF-α inhibitor infliximab or cyclosporine,<br />

which is indicated in ulcerative colitis.<br />

Very few patients require<br />

accelerated therapy<br />

This type of accelerated therapy is required in<br />

only a small percentage of patients, the gastroenterologist<br />

said. A majority of patients, in<br />

fact, can be brought to remission during the first<br />

therapy step and can be maintained free of disease<br />

flares for extended periods. J. Schölmerich<br />

cited data according to which 35% of Crohn’s<br />

patients and 48% of those with ulcerative colitis<br />

remain symptom-free and feel well at four years.<br />

The fact that patients with inflammatory bowel<br />

diseases exhibit a practically normal life expectancy<br />

also confirms the success of the current standard<br />

treatment in the majority of cases.<br />

In addition, J. Schölmerich said, the exact meaning<br />

for an individual patient of endoscopically<br />

documented mucosal healing and whether this<br />

observation is associated with a better long-term<br />

outcome remains completely unclear. “Unlike in<br />

rheumatology, where joint destruction can be<br />

directly visualized, there are no corresponding<br />

endpoints in inflammatory bowel diseases,”<br />

J. Schölmerich said. At present, mucosal healing<br />

can be considered a surrogate parameter, the<br />

long-term meaning of which in achieving a favorable<br />

disease course remains unclear. According<br />

to J. Schölmerich, the current situation does<br />

not justify treating patients with newly diagnosed<br />

Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis according to<br />

the “Top Down” model. This would, in his opinion,<br />

represent “overtreatment”.<br />

<strong>153</strong><br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!