Research matters - Illuminating Engineering Society
Research matters - Illuminating Engineering Society
Research matters - Illuminating Engineering Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ENERGY ADVISOR<br />
Willard L.Warren,<br />
PE, LC, FIESNA<br />
THE SIZE OF THE ELECTRIC<br />
feeders required for a new building<br />
are determined in accordance with<br />
the National Electric Code’s (NEC)<br />
“General Lighting Loads by Occupancy,”-<br />
Table 220.3(A).<br />
The minimum unit loads for lighting<br />
are given in volt-amperes per sq.<br />
ft, which is watts per square foot<br />
divided by power factor. For most<br />
commercial and institutional occupancies<br />
the power factor is essentially<br />
1.0 per ft, so watts per square foot<br />
equal volt ampere per square foot<br />
(VA per sq ft). There are about 20<br />
occupancies listed in the table; here<br />
are the calculated loads for three of<br />
them:<br />
• Office Buildings-3.5 watts per sq<br />
ft + 1 watt per sq ft for receptacle<br />
outlets<br />
• Schools and Stores-3 watts per<br />
sq ft<br />
• Restaurants, Hospitals and<br />
Hotels-2 watts per sq ft<br />
(Please note that these watts per<br />
square foot are two to three times<br />
higher than the LPDs that the new<br />
innocent promise<br />
of a spring morning<br />
LEE<br />
Filters<br />
the beckoning call<br />
of far horizons<br />
warm glow of<br />
harvest home<br />
The Art of Light<br />
energy code allows.)<br />
The 2002 NEC Handbook points<br />
out that “energy saving type calculations<br />
are not permitted to be used to<br />
determine the “calculated” lighting<br />
load...but can be a useful tool to<br />
reduce the “connected” lighting load.<br />
The “calculated” load, in watts per sq<br />
ft, determines the copper size for the<br />
customer’s service feeders; the “connected”<br />
lighting load, also in watts<br />
per sq ft, theoretically determines<br />
what’s connected electrically through<br />
the feeders, but the real Energy Used<br />
for Lighting is the “actual” lighting<br />
load, in kilowatts, times the hours<br />
used, and is given in kilowatt hours<br />
(kWh), and it’s the “lighting energy<br />
usage” that determines the lighting<br />
portion of the electric bill.<br />
The Diversity Factor<br />
Interestingly, the NEC allows the<br />
consulting electrical engineer to<br />
apply a “demand factor” to allow for<br />
a reduction in the customer’s copper<br />
requirement as the size of the installation<br />
increases. It stands to reason<br />
Award Winning Lighting Filters<br />
Fluorescent Sleeves - Frosted Dichroic Glass - Quick Rolls<br />
LEE Filters www.leefiltersusa.com (800) 576-5055<br />
Circle 46 on Reader Service Card.<br />
that the larger the facility, the less<br />
likely that every electrical and lighting<br />
device is on at the same time.<br />
Utilities also apply a “diversity factor,”<br />
from experience, to reduce the size<br />
of their copper feeders, since not<br />
every electrical device will be utilized<br />
at the same time because of the<br />
diversity of occupancy.<br />
After allowing for a feeder size<br />
reduction for the NEC’s “demand<br />
factor” and then a realistic “diversity<br />
factor,” the utility provides an incoming<br />
service to the customer with<br />
much smaller copper cables than the<br />
NEC calculations require the customer<br />
to buy. Con Ed in NYC did a<br />
survey not long ago and reported to<br />
our NYC Code Committee that<br />
restaurants never exceed 50 percent<br />
of their “calculated” load, so Con Ed’s<br />
feeders are smaller and more realistic<br />
than the NEC requires that the<br />
customer must provide.<br />
PIER Project<br />
In addition, energy usage is much<br />
less when energy saving measures<br />
are taken. As I pointed out in a previous<br />
column, the one-year California<br />
PIER project experiment is near<br />
completion in 12 schools in<br />
California to determine how much<br />
load the diversity factor and energy<br />
saving measures actually reduces<br />
lighting usage.<br />
In these 12 schools there are over<br />
24 classrooms with three lamp<br />
direct/indirect pendent luminaires in<br />
two or three-24 ft long rows,<br />
depending on classroom width. Each<br />
unit has 2-4 ft electronic T8 lamps<br />
uplighting for general illumination,<br />
and 1- 4 ft T8 lamp on a dimmer, for<br />
a downlighting task light to take<br />
notes when audiovisual teaching is<br />
used. The horizontal illumination is<br />
50 fc minimum maintained; the vertical<br />
illumination on the chalkboards is<br />
approx 20 fc maintained. Both levels<br />
are quite uniform.<br />
The classrooms are approximately<br />
750 sq ft, in area. The “calculated”<br />
load for the purpose of sizing feeders<br />
by NEC Table 220.3(A) is 75O sq f t<br />
x 3 watts per sq ft = 2250 watts.<br />
The “connected” load is: 18 units<br />
(for three rows) times 50 watts per<br />
unit (low power ballasts) = 900 watts<br />
for general lighting, plus; 9 times 50<br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .