30.01.2013 Views

Research matters - Illuminating Engineering Society

Research matters - Illuminating Engineering Society

Research matters - Illuminating Engineering Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENERGY ADVISOR<br />

Willard L.Warren,<br />

PE, LC, FIESNA<br />

THE SIZE OF THE ELECTRIC<br />

feeders required for a new building<br />

are determined in accordance with<br />

the National Electric Code’s (NEC)<br />

“General Lighting Loads by Occupancy,”-<br />

Table 220.3(A).<br />

The minimum unit loads for lighting<br />

are given in volt-amperes per sq.<br />

ft, which is watts per square foot<br />

divided by power factor. For most<br />

commercial and institutional occupancies<br />

the power factor is essentially<br />

1.0 per ft, so watts per square foot<br />

equal volt ampere per square foot<br />

(VA per sq ft). There are about 20<br />

occupancies listed in the table; here<br />

are the calculated loads for three of<br />

them:<br />

• Office Buildings-3.5 watts per sq<br />

ft + 1 watt per sq ft for receptacle<br />

outlets<br />

• Schools and Stores-3 watts per<br />

sq ft<br />

• Restaurants, Hospitals and<br />

Hotels-2 watts per sq ft<br />

(Please note that these watts per<br />

square foot are two to three times<br />

higher than the LPDs that the new<br />

innocent promise<br />

of a spring morning<br />

LEE<br />

Filters<br />

the beckoning call<br />

of far horizons<br />

warm glow of<br />

harvest home<br />

The Art of Light<br />

energy code allows.)<br />

The 2002 NEC Handbook points<br />

out that “energy saving type calculations<br />

are not permitted to be used to<br />

determine the “calculated” lighting<br />

load...but can be a useful tool to<br />

reduce the “connected” lighting load.<br />

The “calculated” load, in watts per sq<br />

ft, determines the copper size for the<br />

customer’s service feeders; the “connected”<br />

lighting load, also in watts<br />

per sq ft, theoretically determines<br />

what’s connected electrically through<br />

the feeders, but the real Energy Used<br />

for Lighting is the “actual” lighting<br />

load, in kilowatts, times the hours<br />

used, and is given in kilowatt hours<br />

(kWh), and it’s the “lighting energy<br />

usage” that determines the lighting<br />

portion of the electric bill.<br />

The Diversity Factor<br />

Interestingly, the NEC allows the<br />

consulting electrical engineer to<br />

apply a “demand factor” to allow for<br />

a reduction in the customer’s copper<br />

requirement as the size of the installation<br />

increases. It stands to reason<br />

Award Winning Lighting Filters<br />

Fluorescent Sleeves - Frosted Dichroic Glass - Quick Rolls<br />

LEE Filters www.leefiltersusa.com (800) 576-5055<br />

Circle 46 on Reader Service Card.<br />

that the larger the facility, the less<br />

likely that every electrical and lighting<br />

device is on at the same time.<br />

Utilities also apply a “diversity factor,”<br />

from experience, to reduce the size<br />

of their copper feeders, since not<br />

every electrical device will be utilized<br />

at the same time because of the<br />

diversity of occupancy.<br />

After allowing for a feeder size<br />

reduction for the NEC’s “demand<br />

factor” and then a realistic “diversity<br />

factor,” the utility provides an incoming<br />

service to the customer with<br />

much smaller copper cables than the<br />

NEC calculations require the customer<br />

to buy. Con Ed in NYC did a<br />

survey not long ago and reported to<br />

our NYC Code Committee that<br />

restaurants never exceed 50 percent<br />

of their “calculated” load, so Con Ed’s<br />

feeders are smaller and more realistic<br />

than the NEC requires that the<br />

customer must provide.<br />

PIER Project<br />

In addition, energy usage is much<br />

less when energy saving measures<br />

are taken. As I pointed out in a previous<br />

column, the one-year California<br />

PIER project experiment is near<br />

completion in 12 schools in<br />

California to determine how much<br />

load the diversity factor and energy<br />

saving measures actually reduces<br />

lighting usage.<br />

In these 12 schools there are over<br />

24 classrooms with three lamp<br />

direct/indirect pendent luminaires in<br />

two or three-24 ft long rows,<br />

depending on classroom width. Each<br />

unit has 2-4 ft electronic T8 lamps<br />

uplighting for general illumination,<br />

and 1- 4 ft T8 lamp on a dimmer, for<br />

a downlighting task light to take<br />

notes when audiovisual teaching is<br />

used. The horizontal illumination is<br />

50 fc minimum maintained; the vertical<br />

illumination on the chalkboards is<br />

approx 20 fc maintained. Both levels<br />

are quite uniform.<br />

The classrooms are approximately<br />

750 sq ft, in area. The “calculated”<br />

load for the purpose of sizing feeders<br />

by NEC Table 220.3(A) is 75O sq f t<br />

x 3 watts per sq ft = 2250 watts.<br />

The “connected” load is: 18 units<br />

(for three rows) times 50 watts per<br />

unit (low power ballasts) = 900 watts<br />

for general lighting, plus; 9 times 50<br />

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!