St Peters-Section 12 Appendices - Historic Scotland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12.10.5 12.10.6 12.10.7 12.10.8 12.10.9 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT - VOLUME 1: ST PETER’S SEMINARY FEBRUARY 2008 315 Final Issue 1. Detailed comments on particular items in the buildings or estate grounds 2. Statements regarding the relative validity of the Options considered 3. Comments on the determination of the current Planning Application and Enabling Development 4. Comments on the reporting of recommendations and actions that should be taken in the immediate future. The following summarizes the feedback received, any comments in immediate response to these, and the actions taken in respect of the fi nal report edit. World Monuments Fund in Britain Feedback St Peter’s Seminary is one of Scotland most important 20th Century buildings. WMF welcomes the extensive report as a very positive step towards giving the entire site a new future. Notes WMF’s 2006 initiative ‘Modernism at Risk’ and the addition of St Peter’s Seminary to the World Monuments Fund Watch List following selection by an independent international jury. Endorses Twentieth Century Society’s response, and underlines four principal concerns. 1. Complex requires immediate protection from climate and vandalism 2. Site security measures to be put in place immediately to protect buildings and public 3. Whole site should be widely marketed to seek widest interest in its future 4. Further funds should made available to carry out a full Conservation Plan with positive recommendations to save the buildings and re-use them. Current planning application should be shelved pending exploration of every possible solution that retains the buildings Finds proposals by ACAVA to be worthy of further examination. WMF supportive of efforts to plan for a good future for the site. Avanti Architects Response/Actions Include synopsis of WMF feedback in Appendix. Supplement Executive Summary to summarize recommendations for immediate future action.
12.10.10 12.10.11 12.10.12 12.10.13 12.10.14 Argyll & Bute Council CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT - VOLUME 1: ST PETER’S SEMINARY FEBRUARY 2008 316 Final Issue Feedback Welcomes report and recognizes the detailed, specialist work in compiling it. Acknowledges that document is not a Conservation Management Plan but considers that the report clearly sets out the signifi cance of the heritage asset and provides a factual baseline which all parties should sign up to. The report will inform the local planning authority’s approach to current and future applications (in particular the question of enabling development on Kilmahew site) and will guide our future actions. Encourages all interested parties to accept the reports fi ndings and conclusions. Welcomes detailed indicative costs, allowing comparison of options and balanced decisions Believes report sets the scene for the future, encouraging a positive future for this highly signifi cant heritage asset. Report will provide exceptionally strong basis for a full Conservation Management Plan and future appropriate action. Avanti Architects Response/Actions Include synopsis of Argyll & Bute Council’s feedback in Appendix. Supplement Executive Summary to summarize recommendations for immediate future action. Charles Strang Feedback Notes comments are personal observations, not on behalf of the RIAS Suggests a separate short summary document be produced for ease of consultation A most impressive and thorough document, thoughtfully set out. Para numbers throughout might benefi t consultation. Some over-technical terms. Robust repairs required given history of vandalism and rapacious ‘architectural salvage’, especially repairs in advance of re-occupation. Good to identify other members of the GKC practice who may have been involved, and evidence of other practices developing out of training with GKC. Dates of other buildings mentioned in report would be of interest. Agrees importance of boardmarked concrete, and that it should not be overpainted.
Page 1 and 2: Section 12 Appendices CONSERVATION
Page 3 and 4: General Roy’s map showing ‘indi
Page 5 and 6: 2nd Edition Ordnance Survey, 1896-1
Page 7 and 8: Aerial photograph, 15 May 1940 12.1
Page 9 and 10: Current ordnance survey map 12. APP
Page 11 and 12: MacGibbon and Ross indeed suggest a
Page 13 and 14: iii. The Gothick mansion The remain
Page 15 and 16: Detail of the upper part of the E s
Page 17 and 18: vi. Significance The significance o
Page 19 and 20: The possibility that much earlier a
Page 21 and 22: 12. APPENDICES CONSERVATION ASSESSM
Page 23 and 24: 18th Century 1721 ‘…the estate
Page 25 and 26: 1865-95 1st Edition Ordnance Survey
Page 27 and 28: The curling pond is labelled The no
Page 29 and 30: 1967 2 April: Opening of classroom
Page 31 and 32: Helensburgh Library West King Stree
Page 33 and 34: 12. APPENDICES CONSERVATION ASSESSM
Page 35 and 36: CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT - VOLUME 1:
Page 37 and 38: Buildings at Risk Register for Scot
Page 43 and 44: 12.9.6 12.9.7 12.9.8 12.9.9 12.9.10
Page 45 and 46: 12.9.17 12.9.18 12.9.19 12.9.20 12.
Page 47 and 48: 12.9.27 12.9.28 12.9.29 12.9.30 12.
Page 49 and 50: 12.9.38 12.9.39 12.9.40 12. APPENDI
Page 51: 12.10 12.10.1 12.10.2 12.10.3 12.10
Page 55 and 56: 12.10.15 12.10.16 12.10.17 CONSERVA
Page 57 and 58: 12.10.18 12.10.19 12.10.20 CONSERVA
Page 59 and 60: 12.10.23 12.10.24 12.10.25 12.10.26
Page 61 and 62: authenticity the characteristics th

St Peters-Section 12 Appendices - Historic Scotland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?