St Peters-Section 12 Appendices - Historic Scotland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12.10.21 12.10.22 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT - VOLUME 1: ST PETER’S SEMINARY FEBRUARY 2008 321 Final Issue Avanti Architects Response/Actions Record synopsis of Charles Cooper’s feedback in Appendix. None further to those noted in response to other feedback. St Peter’s Building Preservation Trust Feedback Warmly welcomes reports’ fi ndings and acknowledges comprehensive nature of the work undertaken. Nothing further to add to content of the document, but wish to clarify how we might move forward from this work. The report’s fi ndings regarding the current proposals (Option 4 Stabilised Structure) allow Argyll and Bute Council to negatively determine the current planning application. The Trust would then support implementation of Option 1 – the Consolidated Exhibit. This would allow structure to be used for temporary activities to raise funding for investigating re-sue option. To facilitate this Historic Scotland should take the seminary complex into statutory care for the medium term. St Peters Building Preservation Trust would support Historic Scotland in this scenario providing assistance in marketing and investigating re-use options. The report together with The Lighthouse Exhibition has created a defi nite window of opportunity that must be harnessed. A more radical option to progress regeneration would be for the St Peter’s Building Preservation Trust to take ownership of the complex provided that considerable funding and support were available. Believes that marketing of the buildings should coincide with the current window of opportunity resulting from the publication of the report and the current GKC Exhibition, with re-use being the ultimate objective arising from the Conservation Assessment. Believes that current context provides unprecedented opportunity to investigate realistic and long term future for St Peter’s, through increased awareness of GKC’s work and funding mechanisms offered by World Monuments Fund recognition. Key to this will be implementation of Option 1, securing the buildings while allowing them to be used as a viable marketing tool and mechanism to raise funding through temporary events. Urges all parties to keep sight of primary objective of the Conservation Assessment, namely the conservation of the A listed structures and their retention for the benefi t of future generations. Urge appropriate parties to act promptly to determine the current planning
12.10.23 12.10.24 12.10.25 12.10.26 12.10.27 12.10.28 12.10.29 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT - VOLUME 1: ST PETER’S SEMINARY FEBRUARY 2008 322 Final Issue application and provide the necessary context in which to implement to Conservation Assessment’s fi ndings. Would welcome opportunity to meet with all parties following publication, to discuss outcomes, recommendations and role of the Trust in taking these forward. Avanti Architects Response/Actions Record synopsis of St Peter’s Building Preservation Trust’s feedback in Appendix. Supplement Executive Summary to summarize recommendations for immediate future action. Include note in the above summary regarding Reports’ fi ndings on current planning application. Scottish Civic Trust Feedback Trust welcomes the report and is pleased that full restoration remains a possibility. The Trust’s preferred option would to be to restore the complex with a new, sympathetic and sustainable use for the complex. The Trust consider that the complex’s long term future can only be secured by fi nding a suitable use for the building, and whilst they acknowledge that a holding option may be required they consider that enabling development would not be appropriate for any intermediate option and should only be used to secure the full restoration of the complex. Trust hopes that the report and recent renewed interest in the complex will lead to a fruitful debate concerning the future of the complex and estate. Avanti Architects Response/Actions Record synopsis of Scottish Civic Trust’s feedback in Appendix. None further to those noted in response to other feedback. Docomomo Scottish National Group Feedback Notes the three conservation options (Consolidated Exhibit, Holding and Full Restoration) and the further three options (Stabilized Structure, Do Nothing, Demolition) as not viable or inconsistent with signifi cance of the buildings. Specifi c comments on the report
Page 1 and 2:
Section 12 Appendices CONSERVATION
Page 3 and 4:
General Roy’s map showing ‘indi
Page 5 and 6:
2nd Edition Ordnance Survey, 1896-1
Page 7 and 8: Aerial photograph, 15 May 1940 12.1
Page 9 and 10: Current ordnance survey map 12. APP
Page 11 and 12: MacGibbon and Ross indeed suggest a
Page 13 and 14: iii. The Gothick mansion The remain
Page 15 and 16: Detail of the upper part of the E s
Page 17 and 18: vi. Significance The significance o
Page 19 and 20: The possibility that much earlier a
Page 21 and 22: 12. APPENDICES CONSERVATION ASSESSM
Page 23 and 24: 18th Century 1721 ‘…the estate
Page 25 and 26: 1865-95 1st Edition Ordnance Survey
Page 27 and 28: The curling pond is labelled The no
Page 29 and 30: 1967 2 April: Opening of classroom
Page 31 and 32: Helensburgh Library West King Stree
Page 33 and 34: 12. APPENDICES CONSERVATION ASSESSM
Page 35 and 36: CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT - VOLUME 1:
Page 37 and 38: Buildings at Risk Register for Scot
Page 43 and 44: 12.9.6 12.9.7 12.9.8 12.9.9 12.9.10
Page 45 and 46: 12.9.17 12.9.18 12.9.19 12.9.20 12.
Page 47 and 48: 12.9.27 12.9.28 12.9.29 12.9.30 12.
Page 49 and 50: 12.9.38 12.9.39 12.9.40 12. APPENDI
Page 51 and 52: 12.10 12.10.1 12.10.2 12.10.3 12.10
Page 53 and 54: 12.10.10 12.10.11 12.10.12 12.10.13
Page 55 and 56: 12.10.15 12.10.16 12.10.17 CONSERVA
Page 57: 12.10.18 12.10.19 12.10.20 CONSERVA
Page 61 and 62: authenticity the characteristics th
show all

St Peters-Section 12 Appendices - Historic Scotland

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?