You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
——————————————————————> Conseils de révisions / mai 2005<br />
(Note 5), they reversed their decision. Richard Ben-Veniste, another public member of the IWG,<br />
discussed the problems of CIA declassification during his testimony before the Subcommittee on<br />
National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations Committee on Government Reform<br />
of the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 2005:<br />
As one of three non-government members of the IWG appointed by Clinton, I have had direct<br />
experience with the difficulties of getting public release of records stamped "secret." So far, over 8<br />
million pages of previously classified documents have been released. National security has not been<br />
jeopardized. Yet, but for the Act, these records would still be secret. Recently, despite the fact that<br />
relevant records are in some cases more than 50 years old, the CIA balked at full compliance, causing a<br />
delay of more than a year in the IWG's work. Finally, to break the impasse, the IWG had to seek<br />
Congressional intervention. The Act's authors, Sen. Mike DeWine and Rep. Carolyn Maloney, rejected<br />
the CIA's argument for withholding important documents in a meeting with IWG and CIA officials.<br />
Ultimately, the CIA abandoned its opposition and has promised to comply.<br />
In a February interview with the New York Times, Elizabeth Holtzman, one of the public<br />
members of the IWG, said of the CIA's reversal:<br />
This is great news. The C.I.A. will now follow the rule of law, and the disclosure will be crucial to<br />
the American public. I am very pleased.<br />
The IWG was established in January 11, 1999 and has overseen the declassification of about<br />
eight million pages of documents from multiple government agencies. Its original mandate<br />
was to expire at the end of March 2005, but on March 14, 2005, the U.S. House of Representatives<br />
voted to extend the deadline until March 2007 (a recommendation already passed by the Senate on<br />
February 16, 2005.) The IWG is interested in obtaining further information on any war criminals or<br />
suspected war criminals, [Bush Sr Clinton Bush sonny ] especially those with whom the CIA<br />
had relationships, including information on the nature of the relationship and what the individual did<br />
for the agency. The nature of the new requests for information come from leads found in documents<br />
already released by the CIA and other agencies, as well as research done by the IWG historians.<br />
The documents annexed in the CIA names file posted today by the Archive span from the time of<br />
the war to the mid 1990s, and include both captured German documents and documents from various<br />
U.S. government agencies. As with all the CIA names and subject files, only copies of the documents<br />
were released to NARA, not the original documents. The names and subject files are artificial creations<br />
made by the CIA for the purpose of obeying the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act, while disguising how<br />
the CIA organizes its own files. For a more detailed description of the Names Files and the history of<br />
their compilation refer to this notice.<br />
Some of the highlights from the CIA name file on Eichmann include:<br />
• May 24 and 26, 1960 documents revealing CIA surprise at the capture of Eichmann,<br />
requesting more details from an Israeli counterpart on the operation, and offering help in<br />
supplying captured Nazi war documents (Documents 48 and 49, Vol 1) and a later June 15, 1960<br />
document detailing efforts to locate relevant material in the "five-miles" of captured documents<br />
(Doc 13, Vol 2)<br />
• Documents detailing the capture of Eichmann by Israel, including specifics on how the<br />
Israeli agents determined and verified Eichmann's identity. This included staking out his house in<br />
Argentina on the day that would have been his 25th anniversary, and observing him returning<br />
home with flowers and celebrating the date with his wife. He had remarried his original wife under<br />
an assumed name, and the agents surmised that that the wife would not be celebrating the original<br />
date she married Eichmann, unless it was Eichmann. Another document claims the Israelis also<br />
brought in a man who had worked on a kibbutz with Eichmann, who identified him and also<br />
engaged Eichmann in a conversation. In the conversation, the man intentionally made several<br />
minor mistakes about their past meetings, and Eichmann corrected every one. (Documents 62 and<br />
66 Vol 1, Documents 85 and 108 Vol 2)<br />
• Attempts by the CIA in the wake of Eichmann's capture to gather more information on<br />
names connected to Eichmann (Document 7 Vol 2). One CIA memo reveals the fear that<br />
incriminating information on such individuals - including Franz Alfred Six (an SS Lt. Col and<br />
Eichman's boss from 1936-39, and a section leader in the post-war Gehlen intelligence<br />
organization - would make them vulnerable to Soviet recruitment (Document 23 Vol 2).<br />
• An August 24, 1962 walk-in of a man claiming to be Eichmann's son, who offered to help<br />
capture Josef Mengele in exchange for a changed identity (Document 72 Vol 3).<br />
- 11 -