10.01.2015 Views

Mai - Vho

Mai - Vho

Mai - Vho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

——————————————————————> Conseils de révisions / mai 2005<br />

(Note 5), they reversed their decision. Richard Ben-Veniste, another public member of the IWG,<br />

discussed the problems of CIA declassification during his testimony before the Subcommittee on<br />

National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations Committee on Government Reform<br />

of the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 2005:<br />

As one of three non-government members of the IWG appointed by Clinton, I have had direct<br />

experience with the difficulties of getting public release of records stamped "secret." So far, over 8<br />

million pages of previously classified documents have been released. National security has not been<br />

jeopardized. Yet, but for the Act, these records would still be secret. Recently, despite the fact that<br />

relevant records are in some cases more than 50 years old, the CIA balked at full compliance, causing a<br />

delay of more than a year in the IWG's work. Finally, to break the impasse, the IWG had to seek<br />

Congressional intervention. The Act's authors, Sen. Mike DeWine and Rep. Carolyn Maloney, rejected<br />

the CIA's argument for withholding important documents in a meeting with IWG and CIA officials.<br />

Ultimately, the CIA abandoned its opposition and has promised to comply.<br />

In a February interview with the New York Times, Elizabeth Holtzman, one of the public<br />

members of the IWG, said of the CIA's reversal:<br />

This is great news. The C.I.A. will now follow the rule of law, and the disclosure will be crucial to<br />

the American public. I am very pleased.<br />

The IWG was established in January 11, 1999 and has overseen the declassification of about<br />

eight million pages of documents from multiple government agencies. Its original mandate<br />

was to expire at the end of March 2005, but on March 14, 2005, the U.S. House of Representatives<br />

voted to extend the deadline until March 2007 (a recommendation already passed by the Senate on<br />

February 16, 2005.) The IWG is interested in obtaining further information on any war criminals or<br />

suspected war criminals, [Bush Sr Clinton Bush sonny ] especially those with whom the CIA<br />

had relationships, including information on the nature of the relationship and what the individual did<br />

for the agency. The nature of the new requests for information come from leads found in documents<br />

already released by the CIA and other agencies, as well as research done by the IWG historians.<br />

The documents annexed in the CIA names file posted today by the Archive span from the time of<br />

the war to the mid 1990s, and include both captured German documents and documents from various<br />

U.S. government agencies. As with all the CIA names and subject files, only copies of the documents<br />

were released to NARA, not the original documents. The names and subject files are artificial creations<br />

made by the CIA for the purpose of obeying the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act, while disguising how<br />

the CIA organizes its own files. For a more detailed description of the Names Files and the history of<br />

their compilation refer to this notice.<br />

Some of the highlights from the CIA name file on Eichmann include:<br />

• May 24 and 26, 1960 documents revealing CIA surprise at the capture of Eichmann,<br />

requesting more details from an Israeli counterpart on the operation, and offering help in<br />

supplying captured Nazi war documents (Documents 48 and 49, Vol 1) and a later June 15, 1960<br />

document detailing efforts to locate relevant material in the "five-miles" of captured documents<br />

(Doc 13, Vol 2)<br />

• Documents detailing the capture of Eichmann by Israel, including specifics on how the<br />

Israeli agents determined and verified Eichmann's identity. This included staking out his house in<br />

Argentina on the day that would have been his 25th anniversary, and observing him returning<br />

home with flowers and celebrating the date with his wife. He had remarried his original wife under<br />

an assumed name, and the agents surmised that that the wife would not be celebrating the original<br />

date she married Eichmann, unless it was Eichmann. Another document claims the Israelis also<br />

brought in a man who had worked on a kibbutz with Eichmann, who identified him and also<br />

engaged Eichmann in a conversation. In the conversation, the man intentionally made several<br />

minor mistakes about their past meetings, and Eichmann corrected every one. (Documents 62 and<br />

66 Vol 1, Documents 85 and 108 Vol 2)<br />

• Attempts by the CIA in the wake of Eichmann's capture to gather more information on<br />

names connected to Eichmann (Document 7 Vol 2). One CIA memo reveals the fear that<br />

incriminating information on such individuals - including Franz Alfred Six (an SS Lt. Col and<br />

Eichman's boss from 1936-39, and a section leader in the post-war Gehlen intelligence<br />

organization - would make them vulnerable to Soviet recruitment (Document 23 Vol 2).<br />

• An August 24, 1962 walk-in of a man claiming to be Eichmann's son, who offered to help<br />

capture Josef Mengele in exchange for a changed identity (Document 72 Vol 3).<br />

- 11 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!