Mai - Vho

——————————————————————> Conseils de révisions / mai 2005
n'interdit la vente d'objets de collection». Tout serait donc ici question d'éthique des affaires Qu'en
pense-t-on au Centre pour l'égalité des chances et la lutte contre le racisme «La loi de 95 intervient
notamment à propos des ventes de livres interdits, comme certains ouvrages de Degrelle. Si un
premier courrier n'est pas suivi d'effets, il peut y avoir une action en cessation, et le cas échéant,
paiement d'astreintes, si les objets incriminés ne sont pas retirés, à condition qu'il s'agisse d'un site
hébergé en Belgique», assure François Sant'Angelo, juriste au Centre. «Notez que les sites de vente ne
sont pas seuls concernés. On trouve aussi des interventions négationnistes et des renvois
fréquents vers des sites négationnistes sur des forums hébergés par Skynet qui tente pourtant de réagir
promptement. Le principe étant d'instiller le doute dans l'esprit des internautes...».
La vigilance s'impose. Mais les efforts sont difficiles à maintenir sur la durée. Ainsi, le site
Amazon.fr, qui avait été expurgé il y a quelques années de tout contenu douteux, propose-t-il
toujours quelques ouvrages signés Robert Faurisson. Pas en français, mais en anglais. Un
oubli
P.V.C. Mis en ligne le 08/04/2005, La Libre Belgique 2005
< http://www.lalibre.be/article.phtmlid=10&subid=90&art_id=214340 >
MANUSCRIT BRÛLÉ
Anne Frank Diary
Siegfried Verbeke
Some years ago, I was on trial in Amsterdam, libeled by the Anne Frank Foundation Amsterdam
and Basel (Swizerland), because of publishing Faurissons critical book about Anne Frank's Diary +
my own comments. The Foundations asked the court that I and anyone else in the future should be
convicted, when doubting about the authenticity. They wanted that the court should "canonize" or
declare for authentic the famous Anne Frank Diary.
But, at the end of the trial I was not convicted because of doubting about the authenticity! The
court was in a difficult situation, because I asked the court to show me at least that authentic diary if
they want to canonize it. This was impossible, the original Diary doesn't exist anymore, excepted for
some 1944 months/entries.
Otto Frank coming home didn't found his daughter's diary, because she probably destroyed it
herself. He found only the entries of the last '44 months, before being arrested and deported. What he
found was Anne Frank's novel "Het achterhuis" "The annexe" (or "The attic"), a phantasy-story, based
on her diary of the last years. Anne wanted to become a famous writer on one side, and she didn't want
that someone else would ever read her personal diary, which for that time were very "personal" about
her parents, and about a young girl's sexual interest. She wrote herself, that she would make it so, that
nobody would ever read it. It's my hypothesis, that she burned all authentic diary-entries, after she had
used them for writing the novel.
In any case, what you read now, is "The attic", a novel, and NOT her diary. I was not
condemned on the heart of the matter. I was only condemned for libel because Faurisson qualified
Otto Frank as a literary fraudeur.
General conclusion
It is always the same: a novel becomes an authentic diary; a crematory becomes a gas chamber;
deportation becomes extermination; a Palestinian who figths for his country is a terrorist; a country
where the original people are not allowed to live in or even to vote, is a western democracy.
Siegfried Verbeke
Patriot letter, 14 March 2005
LE BARATIN SANS FIN
LE FAUX GROSSIER, que le musée américain de l'Holocauste USHMM avait présenté comme
un moulage de la porte de chambre à gaz de Maidanek, avait fait scandale au moment de l'ouverture
du musée. Les révisionnistes en avaient fait tant de gorges chaudes que le piteux Berenbaum, sans rien
- 41 -