18.07.2013 Views

Hvorfor vurderer erfarne klinikere så dårlig enda de - Universitetet i ...

Hvorfor vurderer erfarne klinikere så dårlig enda de - Universitetet i ...

Hvorfor vurderer erfarne klinikere så dårlig enda de - Universitetet i ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19<br />

positivisme å gjøre at man forsøker å finne måter å håndtere informasjon på som gir<br />

systematisk bedre resultater enn eget skjønn. Det dreier seg <strong>de</strong>rimot om skjebnen til <strong>de</strong>m<br />

man er satt til å vur<strong>de</strong>re og behandle, om etikk og profesjonell re<strong>de</strong>lighet.<br />

Referanser<br />

Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta psychologica, 45, 223-241.<br />

Camerer, C. F. (1981). General conditions for the success of bootstrapping mo<strong>de</strong>ls. Organizational<br />

behavior and human performance, 27, 411-422.<br />

Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert<br />

judgment. I K. A. Ericsson, & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise (ss.<br />

195-217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Ceci, J. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, CD: APA.<br />

Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of<br />

valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of abnormal psychology, 74, 271-280.<br />

Chi, M. T, Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ:<br />

Erlbaum.<br />

Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions. American Psychologist, 26,<br />

180-88.<br />

Dawes, R. M. (1988). You can't systematize human judgment: Dyslexia. I J. Dowie & A.<br />

Elstein (Eds.), Professional judgment (ss. 150-162). Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards. Psychology and psychotherapy built on myths. New<br />

York: Free Press.<br />

Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan B. S. (1974). Linear mo<strong>de</strong>ls in <strong>de</strong>cision making. Psychological<br />

Bulletin, 81, 95-106.<br />

Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment.<br />

Science, 243, 1668-1673.<br />

Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do. New York: Harper & Row .<br />

Dreyfus, H. L. (1985). Competent systems: the limits of calculative rationality. Foredragsmanuskript,<br />

20.5, <strong>Universitetet</strong> i Oslo.<br />

Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, E. (1986). Mind over machine. The power of human intuition<br />

and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.<br />

Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: problems and opportunities.<br />

I D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment un<strong>de</strong>r uncertainty:<br />

Heuristics and biases (ss. 249-67) Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organizational<br />

behavior and human performance, 7, 86-106.<br />

Elgarøy, S. (1995). Med ho<strong>de</strong>t i behold. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 32, 1040-<br />

1041.<br />

Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: evi<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual review of psychology, 47, 273-305.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!