to download PDF in portuguese - Sociedade Brasileira de ...
to download PDF in portuguese - Sociedade Brasileira de ...
to download PDF in portuguese - Sociedade Brasileira de ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34ARTIGO ORIGINAL<br />
E-learn<strong>in</strong>g as a complement <strong>to</strong> presential<br />
teach<strong>in</strong>g of bl<strong>in</strong>dness prevention:<br />
a randomized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial<br />
‘E-learn<strong>in</strong>g’ como um complemen<strong>to</strong> do ens<strong>in</strong>o<br />
presencial <strong>de</strong> prevenção da cegueira: ensaio clínico<br />
Rodrigo Pessoa Cavalcanti Lira 1 , João Paulo Fernan<strong>de</strong>s Felix 1 , Fernando Rodrigo Pedreira Chaves 1 , Enzo Augus<strong>to</strong><br />
Me<strong>de</strong>iros Fulco 1 , Keila Miriam Monteiro <strong>de</strong> Carvalho 1 , Anita Zimmermann 1<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Objective: To <strong>in</strong>vestigate if E-learn<strong>in</strong>g material improves the basal stu<strong>de</strong>nt knowledge level before attend<strong>in</strong>g the presential class of<br />
bl<strong>in</strong>dness prevention (BP) and if helps <strong>to</strong> fix this <strong>in</strong>formation one-month after the class. Methods: Fourth-year medical stu<strong>de</strong>nts were<br />
randomly assigned <strong>to</strong> have a presential class of BP (Traditional group = TG) or <strong>to</strong> have a presential class of BP plus an additional E-<br />
learn<strong>in</strong>g material (E-learn<strong>in</strong>g group = ELG). This material was e-mailed one week before the presential class. The stu<strong>de</strong>nts were<br />
submitted <strong>to</strong> a multiple-choice test (with three options each) with seven questions immediately before the presential class, immediately after<br />
the class, and one-month later. The three tests had the same questions; however, the answers options were distributed <strong>in</strong> different<br />
sequences. The primary outcome was immediate pretest score. The secondary outcomes were immediate posttest score and one-month<br />
posttest score. Results: Among the 120 fourth-year medical stu<strong>de</strong>nts, a random sample of 34 stu<strong>de</strong>nts was assigned <strong>to</strong> the TG and 34<br />
stu<strong>de</strong>nts was assigned <strong>to</strong> the ELG. The two groups showed similar immediate posttest score (TG=6.8 and ELG=6.9; P