09.06.2013 Views

LRFrapport_20130521_ny

LRFrapport_20130521_ny

LRFrapport_20130521_ny

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

national system of environmental quality objectives, in which the Parliament stated that the<br />

environmental quality objectives certainly should be ambitious and challenging but they must<br />

not be formulated so that they become impossible to achieve.<br />

3.5.2 LRF's proposal<br />

Marine Environmental policy indeed must remain a political matter in Sweden. The current<br />

Swedish system, in which governmental decisions are made within HELCOM BSAP and then<br />

transferred down to the agencies without passing the parliamentarian level, is not the result of<br />

a conscious policy choice of the present government, but rather a consequence of a previous<br />

governments’ unique way of transposing the EU WFD and MSFD into Swedish legisation.<br />

LRF is of the opinion that this unique way is highly questionable, an opinion recently<br />

confirmed in the report to the parliamentarian Environmental Objectives’ Council. The<br />

Parliament, the Government and the authorities therefore need to urgently review and adjust<br />

the method to transpose and implement the EU WFD and MSFD and the HELCOM BSAP, to<br />

ensure that Sweden not unilaterally expose themselves for politically undesirable and<br />

unreasonable consequences for the economy, employment and food production, with highly<br />

uncertain environmental benefits. Such changes would also be necessary for the general<br />

improvement of the framework for marine and water policies in Sweden and to restore overall<br />

confidence in environmental governance.<br />

Furthermore, the government must ensure that there is made a preliminary socio-economic<br />

impact assessment of the proposed ecological targets and reduction target before they are<br />

decided within HELCOM.<br />

The government should furthermore present a report to the parliament in time for the<br />

HELCOM meeting in October 2013 for its consideration. It should be based on the latest<br />

available knowledge and recognize the socio-economic consequences. The report should be<br />

looked upon as the start of a revised and continued ambitious Baltic Sea policy in Sweden and<br />

throughout the region. The goal should be fastest possible restoration of the Baltic Sea to the<br />

lowest possible cost, without unjustified and disproportional costs for individual countries,<br />

sectors, companies and persons within the frames provided by the EU Marine Strategy<br />

Framework Directive and the Water Framework Directive, the co-ordination of HELCOM<br />

21<br />

Remissversion, 21.05.2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!