1 PrimÃ¡tor mesta Nitry Nitra 30. 10. 2008 P O Z V Ã ... - Mesto Nitra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

- 6 –Správa o výsledku kontroly bola vypracovaná dňa 11.09.2008 a prerokovaná dňa29.9.2008.Námietky ku kontrolným zisteniam neboli vznesené. Riaditeľ školy upozornilzamestnancov zodpovedných za zistené nedostatky ústne na pracovnej porade konanej dňa29.9.2009 a na odstránenie nedostatkov zistených kontrolou prijal tieto opatrenia:1. Spracovať dodatok k výdajovej zmluve o vývoze splaškových vôd, ktorý upravíplatnosť zmluvy a špecifikuje cenu za poskytnutú službu.Termín: 15.10.2008Zodpov.: PaedDr. Peter Zákopčanriaditeľ školy2 Spracovať dodatky k príjmových zmluvám o vývoze odpadu zo septiku v zmyslekontrolných zistení.Termín: 15.10.2008Zodpov.: PaedDr. Peter Zákopčanriaditeľ školy3. Vykonávať predbežnú finančnú kontrolu v zmysle zák.č. 502/2001 Z.z. o finančnejkontrole a vnútornom audite a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení zmien.Termín: ihneď a trvaleZodpov.: ekonóm a poverené osoby4. Kontrolovať vykonávanie finančnej kontroly zo strany riaditeľa.Termín: 1x mesačneZodpov.: PaedDr. Peter Zákopčanriaditeľ školy5. Účtovné doklady – došlé faktúry opatriť prezentačnou pečiatkou.Termín: 1.10.2008Zodpov.: Mgr. M.Drdoľová6. Preukázateľnosť účtovných záznamom pri pokladničných operáciách zabezpečiťzavadením nového systému zakladania a v tomto smere upraviť aj Vnútroorganizačnúsmernicu pre vedenie účtovníctva.Termín: 1.10.2008Zodpov.: Mgr. M.DrdoľováSpráva bola predložená na rokovanie Mestskej rady v Nitre, ktoré sa konalo dňa14.10.2008. Mestská rada v Nitre uznesením č. 640/2008-MR správu prerokovalaa odporučila Mestskému zastupiteľstvu v Nitrea) vziať na vedomie správu a opatrenia prijaté na odstránenie nedostatkov zistenýchkontrolou,b) uložiť hlavnému kontrolórovi vykonať kontrolu plnenia opatrení k 31.3.2009. K: MR
NexusDecisions Applying Child-Sensitive ApproachNexus refers to the required causal link between persecution and one or more of the five statutorily protected groundsand can be established through direct or circumstantial evidence of a persecutor’s motive. 57 Nexus is one of the mostchallenging elements to prove in an asylum case, and is especially difficult for children because they may have limitedknowledge or understanding of the context in which their persecution occurs, or have difficulty articulating anyunderstanding that they do have. 58 Consequently, U.S. and UNHCR guidelines provide that in children’s cases objective,circumstantial evidence of the societal context can be particularly useful and can alone establish nexus. 59 Some judgesapply this framework. For example, an IJ relied on objective evidence of the status of women and children in Salvadoransociety and the reasons the state fails to protect them, and found that a Salvadoran boy suffered abuse on account ofmembership in a particular social group defined in part by his status as a child. According to the IJ, there was “amplecircumstantial evidence of a nexus between domestic violence and the social status of women and children in El Salvador,where such violence is endemic and reflects prevailing norms and beliefs regarding abused women and children.” 60Consequently, the IJ found it “reasonable to infer that the [abuser’s] behavior was influenced by the lack of protectionand societal attitudes towards women and children in a domestic relationship.” 61Another IJ found objective, circumstantial evidence sufficient to establish that a devout, Evangelical Salvadoran girl had awell-founded fear of persecution by gang members on account of her religion. As part of her church youth group, thegirl proselytized to youth in her community, encouraging them to join the church and not engage in crime. Gangmembers attacked and raped a girl from the applicant’s youth group, which terrified the applicant so much that she fled.The IJ found nexus based on testimony by a country conditions expert regarding gang dynamics and motivations and thecontext in which Salvadoran gang violence occurs, as well as the evidence of the rape of a girl similarly situated to theapplicant. 62from South/East Asia (excluding China) had the next highest number of cases found to have no nexus, 17 cases (16% of the total cases from that region).A linear regression analysis conducted by CGRS showed that nationality is indeed an important predictor for when a case from Latin America and theCaribbean region will be found to have no nexus. For example, a child from El Salvador, Guatemala, or Honduras has a 30–36% marginal probability of his/her case being found not to have a nexus, and a child from Mexico 20%, compared to 10% or lower probability of no-nexus for children from other countriesin the region. For both regions, Latin America and the Caribbean and South/East Asia (excluding China), the regression model found that the Asylum Officehearing the case is the biggest factor for predicting the marginal probability of a case being found to have no nexus. The ma rginal probability of a no-nexusfinding for Latin American and Caribbean cases ranged from 4% if the case was heard in Newark to 47% in Los Angeles (New York 15%; Arlington 19%; SanFrancisco 20%; Houston 23%; Chicago 25%; Miami 34%). The marginal probability of a no-nexus finding for South/East Asian (excluding China) casesranged from 7% in Newark to 35% in Arlington (Chicago 12%; New York and San Francisco 15%).59 For example, the DOJ in its Proposed Regulations of 2000 recognized that circumstantial evidence of patterns of violence against individuals similarlysituated to the applicant and the failure of the legal system to protect them is circumstantial evidence that is highly relevant to the nexus analysis. Asylumand Withholding Definitions, 65 Fed. Reg. 76588, 76593 (proposed Dec. 7, 2000); See, e.g., Sarhan v. Holder, 658 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2011); Matter ofKasinga, 21 I. & N. Dec. 357 (BIA 1996); Al-Ghorbani v. Holder, 585 F.3d 980 (6th Cir. 2009); See also Department of Homeland Security’s Position onRespondent’s Eligibility For Relief, Matter of R-A-, No. A73 753 922 (2004); Department of Homeland Security’s Supplemental Brief, Matter of L-R- (2009)(hereinafter DHS Brief in L-R-); 1998 INS CHILDREN’S GUIDELINES, supra note 24, at 21; 2009 UNHCR GUIDELINES, supra note 22. In addition, UNHCR advisesthat adjudicators should have a good understanding of a child applicant’s history, culture, and background in reaching a determination. See 1997 UNHCRUNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN GUIDELINES, supra note 23, at 8.10.60 CGRS Database Case 1097. UNICEF and other leading authorities on violence against women have long recognized that lack of leg al protection is one ofthe causes of domestic violence and has urged states to end impunity for violence against women and girls. See U.N. Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Domesticviolence against women and girls, 6 INNOCENTI DIGEST 8 (2000).61 CGRS Database Case 1097.62 CGRS Database Case 9741. See also CGRS Database Case 4829 (finding nexus between harm and social group of perceived homosexuals in case ofHonduran boy repeatedly raped by uncle and uncle’s friends based in part on circumstantial evidence regarding status of homosexuals in Honduras); CGRSDatabase Cases 6840 and 7072 (cases involving Honduran cousins who were raised by their grandfather – an outspoken gang critic – and whose familywas frequently threatened by gangs and some family members were murdered – two different IJs independently found nexus to a protected ground basedon expert testimony, as well as other circumstantial evidence, in particular attacks against family members).http://supportkind.org | http://cgrs.uchastings.edu14
Page 1 and 2: Primátormesta NitryNitra 30. 10. 2
Page 3 and 4: 27. Návrh na nakladanie s nehnute
Page 5 and 6: N á v r h n a u z n e s e n i e :M
Page 7 and 8: doplneného uznesením č. 329/2004
Page 9 and 10: Komisia Mestského zastupiteľstva
Page 12 and 13: M e s t s k ý ú r a d v N i t r e
Page 17 and 18: Návrh na zmenu uznesenia Mestskéh
Page 19 and 20: Mestské zastupiteľstvo v Nitre -
Page 21 and 22: - 3 -Inventarizácia majetku a záv
Page 23: - 5 -aj nadväznosť účtovných d
Page 27 and 28: Návrh na odpustenie dlhu ( Ing. Ľ
Page 31 and 32: a nahrádza sa znením„o výmere
Page 33 and 34: Návrh na uznesenie:Mestské zastup
Page 35 and 36: KÓPIA LISTU O SCHVÁLENÍ ŽIADOST
Page 37 and 38: Year2008 2009 2010Months jan feb ma
Page 39 and 40: COMMONS 1COMMONSÚrad životného p
Page 41 and 42: COMMONS 3Externá odborná pomoc a
Page 43 and 44: ARSIAL LazioIT PP2Zložka č.1 Zlo
Page 45 and 46: Pohraničný región DeltaRodhopiGR
Page 47 and 48: Technologické lesnícke centrumKat
Page 49 and 50: Mesto NitraSK PP8Zložka č.1 Zlož
Page 51 and 52: Univerzita poľnohospodárskych vie
Page 53 and 54: Národný park New ForestUK PP11Zlo
Page 55 and 56: MESTSKÉ SLUŽBY NITRA, TEHELNÁ 3,
Page 57 and 58: MESTSKÉ SLUŽBY NITRA, TEHELNÁ 3,
Page 59 and 60: 2. ORGANIZAČNÉ ZABEZPEČENIE2 a)
Page 61 and 62: Obvodný úrad koordinuje súčinno
Page 63 and 64: Zoznam miestnych komunikácií s ob
Page 65 and 66: Sneh sa nahromadí traktorovými ra
Page 67 and 68: SOĽ:DRVINA:MOČOVINA:v zastrešeno
Page 69 and 70: 4. KONTROLA ZJAZDNOSTIVykonáva sa
Page 71 and 72: Rozdelenie miestnych komunikácií
Page 73 and 74: Technika v II. poradíNástup techn
Page 75 and 76:
M e s t s k ý ú r a d v N i t r e
Page 77 and 78:
N á v r hčasového plánu práceK
Page 79 and 80:
Časový plán práce Komisie pre f
Page 81 and 82:
Plán prácekomisie MZ v Nitre pre
Page 83 and 84:
Návrh č asového plánu práceKom
Page 85 and 86:
Máj 18.5.2009 o 15,30 h1.Privítan
Page 87 and 88:
2. Kontrola plnenia uznesení3. Inf
Page 89 and 90:
Mestské zastupiteľstvo v Nitre -
Page 91 and 92:
- 2 -Za výsledky činnosti organiz
Page 93 and 94:
Dotácie poskytnuté škole- 4 -Fin
Page 95 and 96:
- 6 -nájme vo výške 150,- Sk/h,
Page 97 and 98:
- 8 -2. Dôslednejšie kontrolovať
Page 99 and 100:
Návrh na uznesenie:Mestské zastup
Page 101 and 102:
M e s t s k ý ú r a d v N i t r e
Page 103 and 104:
Návrh na zriadenie vecného bremen
Page 106 and 107:
Mestský úrad v NitreV Nitre dňa
Page 108 and 109:
Návrhna začatie konaniav zmysle
Page 110 and 111:
Mestský úrad v NitreV Nitre, dňa
Page 112 and 113:
Návrhna rozhodnutie vo veci a na u
Page 114 and 115:
„Čl. 9(4) Orgán podľa odseku 1
Page 116 and 117:
Návrh na uznesenieMestské zastupi
Page 118:
o d p o r ú č aMestskému zastupi
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
- 3 -Majetok prevzatý do správy b
Page 125 and 126:
- 5 -Kontrola účtovných dokladov
Page 127 and 128:
Mestské služby Nitra, Tehelná 3,
Page 129 and 130:
Príloha č.1:Návrh na uznesenie:M
Page 131 and 132:
Návrh na rozpočtové opatrenie v
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
- 3 -Finančné prostriedky boli po
Page 137 and 138:
- 5 -Zmluvy boli uzatvorené aj s n
Page 139 and 140:
- 7 -Podľa predložených cestovn
Page 141 and 142:
- 9 -3. Zabezpečiť doručovanie r
Page 143 and 144:
M E S T S K Ý Ú R A D V N I T R E
Page 145:
717002 Rekonštrukcia Klubu dôchod
Page 148:
Návrh použitia úveru na financov
show all

1 PrimÃ¡tor mesta Nitry Nitra 30. 10. 2008 P O Z V Ã ... - Mesto Nitra

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

1 PrimÃ¡tor mesta Nitry Nitra 30. 10. 2008 P O Z V Ã ... - Mesto Nitra