15.07.2013 Views

K&K. Kultur og Klasse · Nr. 110 · Årgang 2010 - Aarhus University ...

K&K. Kultur og Klasse · Nr. 110 · Årgang 2010 - Aarhus University ...

K&K. Kultur og Klasse · Nr. 110 · Årgang 2010 - Aarhus University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186<br />

K&K <strong>·</strong> <strong>Kultur</strong>&<strong>Klasse</strong> <strong>·</strong> <strong>110</strong> <strong>·</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

SØREN BRO POLD:<br />

THE ART OF SURVEILLANCE<br />

For many years surveillance was perceived in a negative way, but this has changed and we<br />

increasingly are surveilled by cameras and sensors and our behaviour on-line is l<strong>og</strong>ged and<br />

tracked by both companies and (inter-)national intelligence. Far from generating overwhelming<br />

protests, this development is often furthered by people willingly posting personal<br />

and private data to commercial services and companies on the web. Consequently today,<br />

surveillance seems unavoidable and an integrated part of the different social and urban interfaces<br />

spreading around us. This article will discuss this cultural shift in the perception of<br />

surveillance and follow how the cultural perception of surveillance has changed from George<br />

Orwell’s dystopian 1984 to Apple’s liberating 1984 in the advert for the first Macintosh and<br />

to contemporary urban interfaces. It will do so by discussing contemporary urban surveillance<br />

art with a focus on Manu Luksch’ film Faceless (2007), which is a film made exclusively<br />

from ready-made surveillance camera footage. Besides a critical surveillance narrative, this<br />

film also shows dehumanised images of an invisible sociality that have a paradoxical beauty.<br />

LONE KOFOED HANSEN AND CHRISTIAN GAD:<br />

RESISTANCE IS FERTILE – ON THE<br />

OLIGOPTIC GAZE OF SURVEILLANCE<br />

This article sets media artist Jill Magid’s performative artefact “Surveillance Shoe | Legoland”<br />

(2000-7) in dial<strong>og</strong>ue with Bruno Latour’s notion of oligopticon. Both address and<br />

discuss the possibility of conceptualizing surveillance as an always specific, multiple, and<br />

situated phenomenon, and thus question dominant metaphors in surveillance discourse,<br />

e.g. panopticon and Big Brother.<br />

The surveillance of Danish citizens commences at their first breath, as they are assigned<br />

a personal identification number immediately after being born. This enables inspections and<br />

interventions in many diverse ways by the state and other actors during the citizen’s life.<br />

Being merely one example of how surveillance seems to penetrate every aspect of everyday<br />

life, it seems fair to suggest that surveillance is, indeed, a ubiquitous phenomenon of modern<br />

society. On first glance, Jill Magid’s artefact exemplifies this ubiquitous surveillance situation.<br />

The artefact comprises a stiletto, an IR surveillance camera, a battery pack, and a wireless<br />

transmitter. The surveillance camera is pointed up the performer’s leg, thus presenting us<br />

with an extreme worm’s eye view of the world, focusing on the performer’s lower leg and<br />

often on her thigh and crutch as well.<br />

From one perspective, Jill Magid’s “Surveillance Shoe” addresses how everything is potentially<br />

subject to a surveillant gaze — nothing is too intimate. From another perspective,<br />

however, the artefact is an example of how contemporary art investigates the limits and<br />

detailed aspects of particular surveillance situations, and of how surveillance tech nol<strong>og</strong>ies<br />

DETTE MATERIALE ER OPHAVSRETSLIGT BESKYTTET OG MÅ IKKE VIDEREGIVES<br />

INDHOLD<br />

ABSTRACTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!