29.07.2013 Views

Hedebygadekarréen - Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut

Hedebygadekarréen - Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut

Hedebygadekarréen - Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summery<br />

The renovation of the Hedebygade Block<br />

has now come to an end. From the<br />

beginning of 1994, when residents formed<br />

an ecology group in order to put focus on<br />

the block, and to the finalisation of the<br />

ecological demonstration and experimental<br />

project, ten years were to pass. In the<br />

spring of 2003 the renovation of the<br />

courtyard was completed with the physical<br />

renewal of the block. However, the project<br />

was not finalised before the last automatic<br />

reading of heating, electricity and water<br />

consumption of the 150 flats of the block<br />

was received at the beginning of 2004.<br />

With this the hitherto largest ecological<br />

and environmentally sound project in<br />

Denmark was finalised.The total cost was<br />

50 million euro. Of special interest, however,<br />

was the governmental funding of 5 million<br />

euro dedicated to the execution of the<br />

Hedebygade Block as an ecological<br />

demonstration and experiment project.<br />

This report attempts to answer the questions<br />

whether the experiment succeeded<br />

and whether the demonstration value<br />

achieved was commensurate with the 5<br />

million euro invested.The answers are<br />

subdivided into six answers that refer to<br />

six different aspects of the overall project.<br />

In this way it is assessed if the project has<br />

been a success concerning:<br />

1. Coherence between vision and<br />

technical results<br />

2. Environmental achievements and<br />

resource gains<br />

3. Architecture and urban esthetical<br />

adjustment<br />

4. Total economy<br />

5. Residents support<br />

6. Commercial perspective<br />

Vision and result<br />

Many different technical solutions were<br />

tested, among these several innovative<br />

ones.The facade solutions were the most<br />

convincing: The sun walls with solar cells<br />

(photovoltaics) and heat exchanger, and<br />

the energy saving facades demonstrated in<br />

the subprojects 5, 6, 7 and 8. Subprojects<br />

6, 8 and 11 are examples of the successful<br />

integration of photovoltaics into the facade.<br />

Solar cells make a visionary impression,<br />

although photovoltaic panels of that size<br />

and of that location provided only a small<br />

supplement to the total electricity<br />

consumption.A prism with light-shaft effect<br />

in Subproject 1 had from the very beginning<br />

been the most visionary and hightech and<br />

attained high demonstration value as well.<br />

However, its price must be lower if this<br />

kind of daylight utilization is to become<br />

widespread.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!