05.02.2013 Aufrufe

Welt Auge - Volker Steinbacher

Welt Auge - Volker Steinbacher

Welt Auge - Volker Steinbacher

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

Dear <strong>Volker</strong>,<br />

This Letter is a part of our struggling Pitcairners striving for the rights of Pitcairn islanders.<br />

Would appreciate any feedback and if possible to pass this on.<br />

Thank you<br />

Meralda<br />

We are a group of concerned Pitcairners on and off the island who are deeply distressed by<br />

the struggle the last six years to prove that the Pitcairn men are not child rapists. We have<br />

been advised by legal experts to take our case to the court of last resort, the Privy Council in<br />

London in July 2006. Now we have come to the point where we need to ask for help, though<br />

it goes against the grain of our independence and self sufficiency. We are used to work for<br />

everything we have, we are hard workers, and it has taken us a great deal of heartache to<br />

decide to ask for help.<br />

The Pitcairn men charged with serious crimes have till now not had their fundamental right of<br />

counsel of their own choice to represent them. A Public Defender and a Deputy Public<br />

Defender from New Zealand were appointed by the Governor of Pitcairn Islands, responsible<br />

for the introduction of English criminal laws to Pitcairn. These counsel were then assigned<br />

under Legal Aid laws to represent the Pitcairn men. Another counsel chosen by the Public<br />

Defender was also assigned to represent them shortly before the 2004 trial. In 2002 this<br />

counel was still an associate member of the law firm chosen to prosecute the alleged crimes.<br />

Again the Pitcairn men had no say in this choice, they had three lawyers to defend the seven<br />

of them, and there was great concern about the situation.<br />

For reasons which they believed to be good and valid, the majority of the Pitcairn men have<br />

lost trust and confidence in the representation assigned to them. They have chosen to obtain<br />

the services of very senior and experienced lawyers, because they are concerned at the very<br />

real prospect that if they don't succeed in the Privy Council appeal, the future of Pitcairn<br />

Island is in extreme peril. We have to appeal for help in raising the funds needed to fight for<br />

our own and Pitcairn's survival. When it is understood that there are less than forty<br />

Pitcairners living on the island, and that the monthly wages range from NZ$50 to NZ$350, it<br />

is clear that a proper fight in the Privy Council is only possible if friends of Pitcairn Island<br />

contribute generously to save a special and unique community.<br />

One of our highly qualified independent lawyers is working for free, the other one at reduced<br />

rate, but there are still associated costs which will all but bankrupt us. The Privy Council in<br />

London in July will cost over NZ$100.000,- an astronomical sum for us, but the only way to<br />

try to get justice for the island.<br />

Essential justice and fairness have not been given to our men in the proceedings so far:<br />

1. No jury trial, the defendants were not judged by their own peers, but by NZ judges<br />

2. The defendants were accused and convicted according to a British law that had never been<br />

promulgated on the island. The relevant Pitcairn ordinance, the only one the islanders knew,<br />

was not applied.<br />

3. The allegations from several Pitcairn women about police promising “compensation”<br />

during interviews were not investigated by the courts.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!