Heterogeneously Catalyzed Oxidation Reactions Using ... - CHEC
Heterogeneously Catalyzed Oxidation Reactions Using ... - CHEC
Heterogeneously Catalyzed Oxidation Reactions Using ... - CHEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 5<br />
conversion was stable within the experimental uncertainty during a few hours, so it cannot be<br />
unambiguously excluded that further long‐term deactivation might occur.<br />
5.3.5 Macroscopic mass transport in the two phase region<br />
One observation made during the phase behavior measurements was that the alcohol‐rich phase is<br />
only small in volume and viscous compared to the CO2 phase. This might hamper the transport of the<br />
alcohol‐rich phase through the reactor. In a simple experiment under non‐reactive (i.e. oxygen‐free)<br />
conditions the effluent mass flow was compared to the feed flow (Figure 5‐8) under definite single<br />
(200 bar) and two phase (100 bar) conditions by measuring the weight increase of the accumulated<br />
benzyl alcohol as a function of time at the system exit and comparison with the feed flow. Starting<br />
with a system pressure of 200 bar, the effluent flow was constant and the catalyst particles only in<br />
contact with the CO2‐dominated phase. Upon change to 100 bar (~20 min), the effluent benzyl<br />
alcohol flow was decreasing to zero before it reached a constant level as high as at 200 bar again<br />
(~70‐80 min). Thus, the organic substrate was deposited in the system including the reactor and the<br />
catalyst particles. Increasing the pressure to 200 bar caused an intermediate massive increase in the<br />
flow which reached again the value observed before (after roughly 20 min). Thus, under single phase<br />
conditions previously deposited substrate is removed from the reactor (and the catalyst particles).<br />
The deposition of substrate in the biphasic pressure region has two important consequences, i.e. a<br />
higher concentration of the substrate in the reactor as compared to the feed and accordingly a<br />
longer residence time of benzyl alcohol in the reactor. Thus, a direct comparison of continuous and<br />
batch experiments is not possible offhand which is additionally complicated by a pressure‐dependent<br />
induction phase observed under batch conditions [7]. Therefore, catalytic batch experiments were<br />
performed in the view cell previously used for phase behavior determination. Also here, two phase<br />
conditions resulted in a higher catalytic activity than single phase conditions. In contrast to the<br />
continuous experiments, selectivities close to 100 % were observed. Due to conversion of benzyl<br />
alcohol to the more readily soluble benzaldehyde, a phase transition from two phases to a single<br />
phase was observed at low pressure (Figure 5‐9).<br />
142