24.02.2013 Views

Optimality

Optimality

Optimality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Linear prediction after model selection 301<br />

sample size, i.e., n = 7. This becomes clear upon inspection of (3.13) and (3.14),<br />

which depend on θ2 through √ nθ2 (for fixed σ1, σ2 and ρ). Hence, for other values<br />

of n, one obtains plots essentially similar to Figure 1, provided that the range of<br />

values of θ2 is adapted accordingly.<br />

We now show how the shape of the unconditional densities can be explained by<br />

the shapes of the conditional densities together with the model selection probabilities.<br />

Since the unknown-variance case and the known-variance case are very similar<br />

as seen above, we focus on the latter. In Figure 2 below, we give the conditional<br />

densities of √ n( ˜ θ∗ 1− θ1), conditional on selecting the model Mp, p = 1, 2, cf. (3.15)<br />

and (3.16), and the corresponding model selection probabilities in the same setting<br />

as in Figure 1.<br />

The unconditional densities of √ n( ˜ θ∗ 1−θ1) in each panel of Figure 1 are the sum<br />

of the two conditional densities in the corresponding panel in Figure 2, weighted by<br />

the model selection probabilities, i.e, π ∗ n,θ,σ (1) and π∗ n,θ,σ<br />

(2). In other words, in each<br />

panel of Figure 2, the solid black curve gets the weight given in parentheses, and the<br />

dashed black curve gets one minus that weight. In case θ2 = 0, the probability of<br />

selecting model M1 is very large, and the corresponding conditional density (solid<br />

curve) is the dominant factor in the unconditional density in Figure 1. For θ2 = 0.1,<br />

the situation is similar if slightly less pronounced. In case θ2 = 0.75, the solid and<br />

0. 0 0. 2 0. 4 0.<br />

6<br />

0. 0 0. 2 0. 4 0.<br />

6<br />

theta2 = 0 ( 0.96 )<br />

0 2 4<br />

theta2 = 0.75 ( 0.51 )<br />

0 2 4<br />

0. 0 0. 2 0. 4 0.<br />

6<br />

0. 0 0. 2 0. 4 0.<br />

6<br />

theta2 = 0.1 ( 0.95 )<br />

0 2 4<br />

theta2 = 1.2 ( 0.12 )<br />

0 2 4<br />

Fig 2. The conditional density of √ n( ˜ θ ∗ 1 − θ1), conditional on selecting model M1 (black solid<br />

line), and conditional on selecting model M2 (black dashed line), for the same parameters as used<br />

for Figure 1. The number in parentheses in each panel header is the probability of selecting M1,<br />

i.e., π∗ n,θ,σ (1). The gray curves are as in Figure 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!