24.02.2013 Views

Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA

Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA

Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NBK at Bangor EHW-1 Pile Replacement Project Final <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Monitoring Report<br />

The wharf is a U-shaped concrete structure built in 1977 for ordnance handling operations in<br />

support of the Trident Submarine squadron home ported at NBK at Bangor (DoN 2011). EHW-1<br />

consists of two 100-foot (ft) (30.5 meters [m]) access trestles and a main pier deck, which<br />

measures approximately 700 ft (213 m) in length and is approximately 500 ft (183 m) wide. The<br />

wharf is supported by both 16-inch and 24-inch diameter hollow, octagonal, pre-cast concrete<br />

piles (approximately 130 ft [40 m] in length) (DON 2011). <strong>Marine</strong> mammal monitoring was<br />

focused in the immediate vicinity of the structure within the WRA, and in the waters<br />

immediately adjacent, where sound pressure levels (SPL) associated with pile installation and<br />

removal activities could potentially be transmitted.<br />

Project Staffing<br />

Staff for the EHW-1 PRP included the project manager, the monitoring coordinator (MC),<br />

marine mammal observers (MMOs), and acoustic technicians (Table 1). MMOs were<br />

experienced in marine mammal identification and had extensive knowledge of the biology and<br />

behavior of locally-occurring species. Acoustic technicians had prior experience conducting<br />

acoustic monitoring during pile driving construction projects. All MMOs were dedicated to<br />

observation of marine mammals and served no other function while conducting observations.<br />

<strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Monitoring Platforms<br />

Vessel-based Monitoring<br />

Four vessels served as observation platforms and marine transportation. These boats included<br />

three 21- to 24-ft (6.4- to 7.3-m) aluminum-hulled jet boats and one 32-ft (9.8-m) fiberglass<br />

monohull boat (leased from Tetra Tech EC, Inc). Vessels were equipped with Global<br />

Positioning Systems (GPS), very high frequency (VHF) radios and depth sounders, and all<br />

captains were United States Coast Guard (USCG)-certified. All captains were familiar with<br />

Puget Sound waterways and the unique characteristics of the region. Vessels were equipped<br />

with elevated observation platforms which provided maximum viewing capability. The jet boats<br />

observation platforms were approximately 2 to 3 ft (0.6 to 0.9 m) above the water line, while the<br />

larger boat had an observation platform that was approximately 8 ft (2.4 m) above the water line.<br />

EHW-1 was originally intended to start at the opening of the fish window and occur concurrently<br />

with TPP. This would allow a sharing of monitoring assets between the two projects which were<br />

located next to each other. However, materials and operational delays prevented EHW-1 repairs<br />

from being initiated on time. As a result, by the time it started, several weeks of far-field<br />

recordings had been conducted for the TPP and sufficient data had already been collected to<br />

characterize small to large piles and determine propagation characteristics. Therefore for<br />

EHW-1, it was determined that one far-field vessel, versus the initial three vessels, would be<br />

sufficient to continue with acoustic recordings and would not substantially affect the<br />

effectiveness of marine mammal monitoring. This was consistent with the language in the<br />

EHW-1 Acoustic Plan which stated that “if the acoustic recordings indicate the actual zone of<br />

influence is significantly smaller than the modeled area, some far-field monitoring locations may<br />

be removed or consolidated if they are unnecessary for effective marine mammal monitoring.”<br />

Bangor, Washington 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!