24.02.2013 Views

Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA

Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA

Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NBK at Bangor EHW-1 Pile Replacement Project Final <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Monitoring Report<br />

Qualitative Observations<br />

In addition to the quantitative results presented above, MMOs made a number of qualitative<br />

observations on the movements and distribution of animals, and on the potential effects of<br />

driving activities on marine mammal behavior. Within the EHW-1 structure, which contains<br />

hundreds of pilings and a large overhead structure, MMOs documented the presence of at least<br />

two “resident” harbor seals, repeatedly observed and easily recognizable by their distinctive<br />

pelage patterns. These two animals, both juveniles, were constantly swimming into and out of<br />

the pile driving and construction areas, as well as within other portions of the EHW-1 structure.<br />

These two animals were observed during the entire duration of monitoring activities in EHW-1<br />

PRP (approximately 4 weeks). Harbor seals spent more time in the vicinity of EHW-1 PRP, and<br />

their use of space and diving/surfacing patterns suggested that they were foraging, rather than<br />

simply transiting through the area. In addition, the two juvenile animals mentioned above were<br />

directly documented foraging in and near the construction zone on several occasions, either<br />

because they were observed with shells or fish in their mouths, or were seen nosing into the hard<br />

growth on the pilings.<br />

Observations at EHW-1 involved multiple observations on a daily basis of one or both of the<br />

“resident” juvenile harbor seals within the 50m (164ft) shutdown zone, and at other locations<br />

within hundreds of meters from the piles. Additionally, EHW-1 repairs involved a number of<br />

other activities including welding; construction of scaffolding on newly driven piles; and the<br />

presence and movement of boats and barges within a confined area. Thus, the number of<br />

sightings available to develop qualitative observations was far greater, albeit with a smaller<br />

number of individual animals. Generally, the “resident’ harbor seals showed little avoidance of<br />

any of the areas of noise or disturbance, and instead often surfaced in areas of activity and then<br />

remained either lying on their backs, or positioned vertically in the water, moving their heads<br />

back and forth scanning the activity area. After 10-20 seconds, they would then dive and either<br />

resurface in a new area or would not be resighted. The MMOs noted that these observations<br />

were consistent with an interpretation of animal curiosity about the activity being conducted.<br />

As a consequence of seals frequently moving into and out of the 50m (164ft) shutdown zone,<br />

pile driving often did not begin and/or did not continue once initiated. Once the shutdown zone<br />

was “cleared” (i.e., no animal within 50 m (164 ft) for 30 minutes, or if within 50 m (164 ft) but<br />

then re-sighted outside the shutdown zone), animals seemed to keep from approaching the<br />

shutdown zone during soft start events and pile-driving activities. However, on a number of<br />

occasions they moved within 50 m (164 ft) of the pile, which resulted in a shutdown of pile<br />

driving. At no time were either distress behaviors or rapid flight observed. Once pile driving<br />

had ceased, the MMOs noted that animals moved back within 50 m (164 ft) of the pile that had<br />

been driven within a few minutes of pile driving cessation. Again, these animals were positively<br />

identified by pelage markings, and MMOs were confident that these animals tolerated multiple<br />

weeks of pile driving activities without abandoning the construction area, or without exhibiting<br />

distress or flight behaviors. Instead, animals maintained heavy use of the area, which may<br />

indicate their habituation, or indifference, to noise and disturbance. Other harbor seals were also<br />

observed within 100 m (328 ft) of pile driving locations before and during pile driving, with no<br />

visible distress signs or active flight behaviors. California sea lions were only occasionally<br />

sighted during monitoring at EHW-1 and were always in transit, generally moving from north to<br />

south. Transiting did not appear to be impaired or accelerated by the pile driving activities. In<br />

Bangor, Washington 63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!