Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA
Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA
Section 1 Introduction - National Marine Fisheries Service - NOAA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NBK at Bangor EHW-1 Pile Replacement Project Final <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Monitoring Report<br />
Qualitative Observations<br />
In addition to the quantitative results presented above, MMOs made a number of qualitative<br />
observations on the movements and distribution of animals, and on the potential effects of<br />
driving activities on marine mammal behavior. Within the EHW-1 structure, which contains<br />
hundreds of pilings and a large overhead structure, MMOs documented the presence of at least<br />
two “resident” harbor seals, repeatedly observed and easily recognizable by their distinctive<br />
pelage patterns. These two animals, both juveniles, were constantly swimming into and out of<br />
the pile driving and construction areas, as well as within other portions of the EHW-1 structure.<br />
These two animals were observed during the entire duration of monitoring activities in EHW-1<br />
PRP (approximately 4 weeks). Harbor seals spent more time in the vicinity of EHW-1 PRP, and<br />
their use of space and diving/surfacing patterns suggested that they were foraging, rather than<br />
simply transiting through the area. In addition, the two juvenile animals mentioned above were<br />
directly documented foraging in and near the construction zone on several occasions, either<br />
because they were observed with shells or fish in their mouths, or were seen nosing into the hard<br />
growth on the pilings.<br />
Observations at EHW-1 involved multiple observations on a daily basis of one or both of the<br />
“resident” juvenile harbor seals within the 50m (164ft) shutdown zone, and at other locations<br />
within hundreds of meters from the piles. Additionally, EHW-1 repairs involved a number of<br />
other activities including welding; construction of scaffolding on newly driven piles; and the<br />
presence and movement of boats and barges within a confined area. Thus, the number of<br />
sightings available to develop qualitative observations was far greater, albeit with a smaller<br />
number of individual animals. Generally, the “resident’ harbor seals showed little avoidance of<br />
any of the areas of noise or disturbance, and instead often surfaced in areas of activity and then<br />
remained either lying on their backs, or positioned vertically in the water, moving their heads<br />
back and forth scanning the activity area. After 10-20 seconds, they would then dive and either<br />
resurface in a new area or would not be resighted. The MMOs noted that these observations<br />
were consistent with an interpretation of animal curiosity about the activity being conducted.<br />
As a consequence of seals frequently moving into and out of the 50m (164ft) shutdown zone,<br />
pile driving often did not begin and/or did not continue once initiated. Once the shutdown zone<br />
was “cleared” (i.e., no animal within 50 m (164 ft) for 30 minutes, or if within 50 m (164 ft) but<br />
then re-sighted outside the shutdown zone), animals seemed to keep from approaching the<br />
shutdown zone during soft start events and pile-driving activities. However, on a number of<br />
occasions they moved within 50 m (164 ft) of the pile, which resulted in a shutdown of pile<br />
driving. At no time were either distress behaviors or rapid flight observed. Once pile driving<br />
had ceased, the MMOs noted that animals moved back within 50 m (164 ft) of the pile that had<br />
been driven within a few minutes of pile driving cessation. Again, these animals were positively<br />
identified by pelage markings, and MMOs were confident that these animals tolerated multiple<br />
weeks of pile driving activities without abandoning the construction area, or without exhibiting<br />
distress or flight behaviors. Instead, animals maintained heavy use of the area, which may<br />
indicate their habituation, or indifference, to noise and disturbance. Other harbor seals were also<br />
observed within 100 m (328 ft) of pile driving locations before and during pile driving, with no<br />
visible distress signs or active flight behaviors. California sea lions were only occasionally<br />
sighted during monitoring at EHW-1 and were always in transit, generally moving from north to<br />
south. Transiting did not appear to be impaired or accelerated by the pile driving activities. In<br />
Bangor, Washington 63