27.02.2013 Views

George-Whitefield-Field-Preacher

George-Whitefield-Field-Preacher

George-Whitefield-Field-Preacher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

324<br />

GEORGE WHITEFIELD<br />

which Lady Betty Cobbe, daughter-in-law of the Archbishop<br />

of Dublin, used to smuggle bishops, whom she had persuaded<br />

to go and hear <strong>Whitefield</strong>, but who did not want to be seen in<br />

such a place as an unconsecrated chapel. The curtained seats<br />

just inside the door were both convenient and secret.<br />

And how was the plan for a college at Bethesda prospering ?<br />

First of all <strong>Whitefield</strong> waited a long time, to give the home<br />

authorities the fullest opportunities for maturing their thoughts;<br />

but by delay they intended hindrance, not help. He therefore<br />

memorialised his Majesty, praying that since the colonists were<br />

deeply interested in the scheme, and were impatiently waiting<br />

for information, something might be done. Now came the<br />

intricacies of 'red-tape.' The original memorial of <strong>Whitefield</strong>,<br />

supported by the ' Address '<br />

of the colonial Houses of<br />

Assembly, was remitted to the Lords Commissioners for<br />

Trade and Plantations, and they sent it to the Archbishop of<br />

Canterbury, who effectually frustrated its intention by a bigoted<br />

demand that the charter of the college, were one granted,<br />

should contain a clause making it obligatory to appoint none<br />

but a member of the Church of England to the office of head-<br />

master. To this demand <strong>Whitefield</strong> offered respectful but<br />

uncompromising opposition. He would have no exceptional<br />

privilege for a Churchman ; he would not have the daily use<br />

of the liturgy enjoined ; he would not have one doctrinal<br />

article entered in the charter. His letter to the archbishop<br />

stating and defending his views is as noble and catholic a<br />

production as ever came from his pen, while its references to<br />

himself and his toils are as pathetic as they are modest. Why<br />

did he object to a compulsory clause respecting the master?<br />

Was he opposed to the Church of England ? By no means<br />

the majority of the wardens were sure to be of that communion,<br />

and their choice would be sure to fall upon a master like them-<br />

selves in belief; but choice and compulsion were very different

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!