02.03.2013 Views

Conference Proceedings 2010 [pdf] - Art & Design Symposium ...

Conference Proceedings 2010 [pdf] - Art & Design Symposium ...

Conference Proceedings 2010 [pdf] - Art & Design Symposium ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The “Peace Village” idea came from turning the Kids’ Guernica art mural into a three-dimensional design<br />

project created using participatory design methods. Thus, it was the coming together of art and design using<br />

the different participatory methods of both.<br />

The School <strong>Design</strong> Project<br />

Decisions regarding spaces for children are often made by owners or stakeholders who are not the actual<br />

users of the space, building or environment. When this is the case, several important needs of users may be<br />

overseen, causing ineffective use of the space or unsatisfied users. Although, participatory processes seem<br />

to consume more time, energy, and resources, they enable quick results that focus on real needs that are<br />

more difficult to reach with other methods. Extended life for building through user contribution and possibility<br />

of more adventurous solutions due to user backed confidence for project are also other possible advantages<br />

(Hadjioannou, 2007; Hasirci and Demirkan, 2003). The idea that lies behind participatory spatial<br />

programming workshops is that people from different ages and different fields can come together and create<br />

efficient design solutions (Sanoff 1980 and 1990).<br />

In a school design project, the aim was first to start a discussion on learning environments and the design of<br />

products, furniture, interior spaces, playgrounds, and entire building complexes for children. The joint project<br />

between the Faculty of <strong>Art</strong> and <strong>Design</strong> of Izmir University of Economics in Turkey and the Department of<br />

Architecture of Chiba University in Japan lasted for three months. In this project, participatory methods were<br />

undertaken with elementary school children and volunteer undergraduate architecture, interior architecture<br />

and industrial design students. Post Occupancy Evaluations on existing city schools, and the design<br />

students’ schools were completed, interviews were done with teachers and students, city plans were<br />

assessed in an effort to evaluate the approach to the school, playground and green areas, and scale. Books<br />

were read and films were watched, and lengthy discussion sessions were held about school design. As a<br />

result, design guidelines for schools were developed, classrooms, desks, and playgrounds were designed.<br />

It was a fruitful process in which the design students learned about participation along with methods of<br />

design programming and awareness on the importance of users and of the special qualities of children’s<br />

environments. The children were happy to be listened to and the design students were excited to be taking<br />

part in this project that required participation on several different levels.<br />

At the end of the summer, designs were exchanged between the two universities, comparing the different<br />

approaches. Both groups of projects were developed according to the needs of the school discovered as a<br />

result of the research period. The need for better designed gathering areas and green spaces were<br />

mentioned frequently, as well as having choices in spending free time within the school and flexibility in<br />

spatial arrangements in classrooms. The learning environment providing for development of motor abilities<br />

and needs for self-actualization were stated as the most critical needs of the children in both Japan and<br />

Turkey.<br />

According to the questionnaires regarding the classrooms completed by the Turkish design students during<br />

their visit to their own elementary schools, the most liked features were colorful furniture, plants or a<br />

connection of the classroom to the outside, large windows, high ceilings, individual desks for students, and<br />

the class providing for interactivity. The most disliked features were, chalk dust, small play areas, hard floor<br />

material, small size of the classroom, noisy chairs and furniture, lack of hooks for coats and bags, lack of<br />

personal area in the classroom, disordered arrangement of classroom, lack of technology, and children not<br />

having their own plants. Regarding the total school environment, most liked features were, school, green<br />

spaces, free gardens, and low building heights. The most disliked features were school, dark colors used in<br />

the interior, lack of hygiene in restrooms, playground full of stones or pebbles, and lack of spaces for sports.<br />

According to the questionnaires completed by the Japanese design students during their visit to their own<br />

elementary schools, the most liked features in the classrooms were, sunny areas in the classroom,<br />

balconies and connections to the outside, high ceilings, easy access to the garden, bulletin boards, plants in<br />

the classroom, variety in seating choices, carpet on the floor large windows, high ceilings. The most disliked<br />

features were, difficulty in seeing the board from the back, seats by the window being cold in the winter,<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!