04.03.2013 Views

Petaluma Bombing Target Archive Search Report ... - Corpsfuds.org

Petaluma Bombing Target Archive Search Report ... - Corpsfuds.org

Petaluma Bombing Target Archive Search Report ... - Corpsfuds.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 EVALUATION OF ORDNANCE POTENTIAL<br />

7.1 CONVENTIONAL ORDNANCE CONTAMINATION<br />

ARCHIVES SEARCH REPORT - FINDINGS<br />

<strong>Petaluma</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 9<br />

The archive search uncovered evidence that the Navy utilized conventional ordnance at<br />

<strong>Petaluma</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 9. The types of ordnance and explosives<br />

associated with the site included practice bombs and rockets. This information was<br />

gathered fkom documentation, maps, aerial photography results, interviews and EOD<br />

reports. The reviewed information did not clearly indicate any other ordnance related<br />

operations at <strong>Petaluma</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 9, such as high explosives.<br />

The ASR team did not find an overt indication of a current ordnance and explosive<br />

hazard at <strong>Petaluma</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 9. Research discovered no historical<br />

records indicating ordnance disposal on site. Interviews'did not disclose any incidents of<br />

ordnance or explosive hazards found in the past. Aerial photography analysis did not<br />

locate any distinct signs of on-site burial. Additionally, the site inspection did not<br />

uncover evidence of ordnance or explosive hazards.<br />

7.2 CHEMICAL WARFARE MATERIAL CONTAMINATION<br />

The archive search uncovered no evidence of chemical warfare materials storage, usage<br />

or disposal at <strong>Petaluma</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 9. The mission of <strong>Petaluma</strong> 12th<br />

Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 9 does not imply the presence of CWM. Research discovered<br />

no historical records associating CWM with the site. Interviews did not disclose any<br />

correlation of CWM with the site. Additionally, the site inspection did not uncover any<br />

evidence of C WM hazards.<br />

Section 7 - Evaluation of Ordnance Potential<br />

Page 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!