Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya-Parts1-2

Part two
137
is why a denier of Tauhid, even if he is a paragon of virtue, cannot
attain salvation. Hence, these people should first ask themselves:
which of these Books has done the most to promote the
concept of God’s Oneness, upon which salvation depends. Can
the Vedas boast one country in which they have introduced the
Oneness of God? Can they point to one tract of land on the
face of the earth where the Rig, the Yajur, the Sham and the
Atharvan have established the concept of Tauhid [Oneness] of
God? The only impact of the Vedas we see in India is in the
form of fire-worship, sun-worship, worship of Vishnu and
creature-worship—the mere mention of which is repugnant.
You may survey India from end to end, everywhere you will
find Hindus engrossed in creature-worship. While some worship
Mahadeva, others sing hymns in praise of Krishna and yet
others worship idols and images.
The case of the Gospels is no different. There is no land in
which they became the means for spreading Tauhid. On the contrary,
its followers consider monotheists unworthy of salvation.
Their priests give monotheists tidings of a dark inferno where
there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth. According to
them, only those will be saved from it who believe that God suffers
death, suffering, hunger, thirst, pain, and that he entered a mortal
body and became flesh; otherwise, there is no hope of salvation.
In other words, they believe that the paradise of their imagination
will be divided among the two great nations of Europe—the
British and the Russians—while all monotheists will be cast into
hell for the crime of considering God to be free from every fault
and imperfection.