TROUBLED WATERS - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
TROUBLED WATERS - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
TROUBLED WATERS - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
nations’ whale killing methods. However, despite Norway’s efforts, the best IDR reported to date<br />
during Norwegian whaling operations is 80.7 per cent (reported for the 2002 hunt). Consequently<br />
some 19.3 per cent of whales killed during this hunt clearly did not die instantaneously; indeed one<br />
whale broke free <strong>and</strong> lived for 1.5 hours <strong>and</strong> the average time to death (TTD) was two minutes 21<br />
seconds (Øen 2003). This IDR statistic of 80.7 per cent is the highest recorded for commercial<br />
whaling since the Commission was established.<br />
TTD <strong>and</strong> IDR statistics should only be considered as ‘best estimates’, rather than reliable data with a<br />
calculable margin of error. The current criteria used for determining death in hunted cetaceans (see<br />
chapter 11) are considered by many experts to be inadequate (Butterworth et al. 2003, RSPCA 2003)<br />
<strong>and</strong> are likely to underestimate the time to death <strong>and</strong> may also result in inflated IDRs. This potential<br />
source of error is further compounded by the fact that the recording of ‘instantaneous death’ during<br />
whaling activities is likely, in reality, to equate to at least ten seconds (Kestin 1995) after harpoon<br />
strike. This is due to the time taken to assess the behaviour of the whale, according to the current<br />
criteria, following the harpoon strike. How long, for example, does one wait to assess immobility?<br />
Consequently, it is likely that the margin of error in the statistics presented to the IWC by all whaling<br />
nations is considerable. These data should, therefore, only be considered as best estimates <strong>and</strong> the<br />
actual times to death for many cetaceans may be significantly longer than current data indicate.<br />
Norway’s whaling efforts use the most sophisticated <strong>and</strong> ‘efficient’ methods that are currently<br />
available. However, Norway still fails to kill around 20 per cent of whales within ten seconds. This<br />
falls far short of international expectations for the slaughter of other animals for commercial<br />
purposes, where humane treatment is required, both before <strong>and</strong> during the slaughter process <strong>and</strong><br />
where the emphasis is placed on ensuring that the animal is rendered immediately insensible, using a<br />
stunning procedure, in order to avoid pain <strong>and</strong> suffering (Gregory <strong>and</strong> Lowe 1999). Furthermore,<br />
even in cases where whales are recorded as killed ‘instantaneously’ (according to the IWC criteria),<br />
the evaluation of ‘instantaneous death’ may take at least ten seconds, during which time some<br />
animals may still have been alive. In Japan’s hunts for minke whales in Antarctica, the figures are even<br />
less satisfactory. In the 2002/2003 JARPA hunt, for example, 59.8 per cent of whales killed were<br />
recorded as not dying ‘instantaneously’ (Ishikawa 2003).<br />
Consider further that the main weapon used during both Norwegian <strong>and</strong> Japanese whaling<br />
operations is the penthrite grenade harpoon, a weapon specifically designed for killing minke whales.<br />
This weapon is also used to kill larger species, for which it has not been specifically adapted, such as<br />
Bryde’s, sei <strong>and</strong> fin whales (Anon 2003). The same basic technology, with a slight increase in<br />
penthrite charge is also used by Japan for killing sperm whales (IWC 2003a). Sperm whales are not<br />
only much larger than minke whales, but also present a significantly different anatomy. This is likely<br />
to significantly influence the course of projectiles <strong>and</strong> energy delivered to the brain, <strong>and</strong> therefore,<br />
the efficiency of any killing method applied. In New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, in recognition of the problems<br />
associated with the humane euthanasia of these very large animals, a specific device has been<br />
developed for euthanasing str<strong>and</strong>ed sperm whales at close range (see chapter 10). To date, Japan has<br />
failed to report any data on the TTD or IDR from the sperm whale hunts that it recommenced in<br />
2000.<br />
The more ‘traditional’ killing methods used during Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW) are less<br />
efficient <strong>and</strong> therefore often fall short of even the relatively poor st<strong>and</strong>ards achieved during<br />
WHALING & WELFARE<br />
125