Modular Infotech Pvt. Ltd. - DSpace
Modular Infotech Pvt. Ltd. - DSpace
Modular Infotech Pvt. Ltd. - DSpace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C 243<br />
The Hon'ble Mr. H. W. THOMSON was called.<br />
3964. Chair11la1l.-Wpat .is your full name ?-HENRY WAGSTAFFE<br />
THOMSON .<br />
. 391>5. You joined the Federated Malay States Civil Service in I8g6?<br />
Yes.<br />
3966. And are now British Resident, Pahang?-Yes.<br />
391>7. You have spent a considerable portion of your service in<br />
Kelantan ?-Yes, nearly ten years of it.<br />
3968. And the rest in which of the States ?-4 years in Selangor, then<br />
2 years and a bit in Kuantan in Pahang, then 6 years in Kelantan;then 3 years<br />
again in Klang, then 6 years mostly in Perak, then 3 years again in Kelantan<br />
and now a year and a bit in Pahang.<br />
391>9. H;tve you seen any scheme that has been proposed for the<br />
purpose of registering and licensing 'opium-smokers ?-I have seen the two<br />
schemes that were circulated, CHEAH CHEANG LIM'S and the Federated Malay<br />
States Committee one of 1919. .<br />
3970. Speaking generally, which do you think the more feasible, if<br />
either was feasible ?-I do not think either is feasible, but the one I prefer,<br />
if you are going to take a scheme of that sort, is the Federated Malay States<br />
Committee one. It seems to me a fairer thing.<br />
3971. As to the feasibility of the preferable one, speaking in regard<br />
to the State of Pahang at present, do you think you could make .it feasible ?<br />
I do not think the District Officers can take it on. I do not think they have<br />
the time. I do not mean they could not do it. If they were given the<br />
staff I think they could do it.<br />
3972. Carry that one step further. If you agree that it is feasible,<br />
do you think that the degree of feasibility would amount to effectiveness?<br />
May I explain. I think you can make this thing feasible as an open scheme;<br />
but if you make it as feasible as you can and as effective as you can, unless you<br />
are also going to be able to prevent the consequent smuggling that is going<br />
to ta.,ke place, then I say no, it would be. useless. I can get my District<br />
Officers to work this scheme with clerks and make it exceedingly efficient;<br />
but I think then you will want such an enormous staff that the nett result<br />
to the country will not be much use. You can take a dry sponge and you<br />
can hold it in your hand and keep it dry in the air; but you keep it ina<br />
basin of water and you cannot keep it dry any longer. . Chandu is so<br />
very easy to smuggle in that if you make. this scheme too tight you are<br />
simply going to induce them to bring it in in other ways.<br />
3973. Would you say that this scheme was a distinct interference with<br />
the liberty of tlW subject ?-I think so.<br />
3974. Do you think the opium position in the Federated Malay States<br />
is such as to call for this interference with the liberty of the subject ?-No,<br />
I do not. From my own personal knowledge I cannot honestly say that I<br />
know of anybody who has been really ruined by the use of opium. I have<br />
seen lots of wrecks whom I am told are heavy opium-smokers, but I have<br />
never had enough personal knowledge of those cases to say whether they<br />
are physical wrecks because they took opium or whether they took opium<br />
and increased the amount of opium because they were physical wrecks,<br />
and as a layman it has always been at the back of my mind that that is why<br />
many of them increased their dose of opium .. As against that, I have known<br />
plenty of clerks, interpreters, mining coolies and 'others who took· their<br />
opium regularly in reasonable quantities and 1 cannot see personally that it<br />
has done them any more hann than it does a man to have a ste1lga'h whisky<br />
and soda. .<br />
3975. 'We have been told that opium smokers lose 50 per cent·of their<br />
physical efficiency as a general proposition. Would you accept that as. a