26.03.2013 Views

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

The first proposition exam<strong>in</strong>ed considers that access to all po<strong>in</strong>ts (corners and <strong>in</strong>tersections <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es)<br />

<strong>in</strong> the study area (Figure 2.4) is necessary <strong>for</strong> effective <strong>fire</strong> control – a reliance on aggressively and<br />

quickly gett<strong>in</strong>g on top <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fire</strong> and putt<strong>in</strong>g it out. Later, suggestions will be made about aggression<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g directed to the <strong>fire</strong> rather than the land – m<strong>in</strong>imum impact suppression tactics or M.I.S.T. (Mohr<br />

1989) – <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the perceived use <strong>of</strong> aerial <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> ground suppression. In this example, access<br />

to all po<strong>in</strong>ts at m<strong>in</strong>imum cost is desired; the usual expectation and the one to which attention is first<br />

directed. The example quickly shows the <strong>in</strong>adequacy <strong>of</strong> consider<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum length alone, and the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> other variables.<br />

In Figure 2.5, a sample square cell from the study area (Figure 2.4) is used to illustrate ways <strong>in</strong> which<br />

access to all po<strong>in</strong>ts could be reached. Which has the m<strong>in</strong>imum length and, by implication, m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

cost? A unit <strong>of</strong> track length is set as the length <strong>of</strong> one side <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual cell.<br />

a b<br />

c d<br />

Figure 2.5 Four options <strong>for</strong> tracks reach<strong>in</strong>g all corners <strong>of</strong> a sample cell <strong>of</strong> dimensions L by L units with<strong>in</strong> a square-grid study<br />

site: (a) perimeter track has length 4L; (b) all po<strong>in</strong>ts are reached with a track length <strong>of</strong> 3L; (c) tracks totall<strong>in</strong>g 2.83L cut across<br />

the cell – 94% the length <strong>of</strong> the track <strong>in</strong> (b); (d) sketch <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum length <strong>of</strong> tracks reach<strong>in</strong>g all po<strong>in</strong>ts (Stewart 1997, pp.<br />

287ff), 2.73L – 91% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> track <strong>in</strong> (b).<br />

Notice the sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> length as one goes from Figure 2.5 (a) to (b) – perimeter tracks – to (c) and<br />

(d) – a spann<strong>in</strong>g tree and Ste<strong>in</strong>er tree, respectively (Stewart 1997, pp. 287ff). The m<strong>in</strong>imum length is<br />

(d), the Ste<strong>in</strong>er tree, where the angle made by the <strong>in</strong>tersect<strong>in</strong>g arms <strong>of</strong> the tracks is 120 o (Brazil et al.<br />

1997; Stewart 1997, p. 287ff). While example (d) shows a sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> only 9% over (b), the value <strong>of</strong><br />

this sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases as the number <strong>of</strong> cells <strong>in</strong>creases.<br />

Fire and adaptive <strong>management</strong> <strong>Underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> <strong>conservation</strong> <strong>in</strong> reserves

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!