26.03.2013 Views

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fire and adaptive <strong>management</strong><br />

vi<br />

Preface<br />

Nowhere <strong>in</strong> Australia are bush<strong>fire</strong> matters more contentious than <strong>in</strong> south-eastern Australia, where<br />

the tw<strong>in</strong> tragedies <strong>of</strong> the destruction <strong>of</strong> economic assets and the loss <strong>of</strong> human life are graphically<br />

presented by the media, along with dramatic pictures <strong>of</strong> high <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>fire</strong>s. What should be done<br />

about such <strong>fire</strong>s?<br />

Media reports implicitly highlight the question, ‘What are our assets?’ Human life and property are<br />

major societal assets. Pastures and stock are rural assets. Native plants and animals, catchments and<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure are also assets. Some assets are affected by one event – houses, human lives, trees and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual animals – others by a sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong>s, especially species <strong>of</strong> plants and animals. Thus <strong>fire</strong>s<br />

affect a diverse array <strong>of</strong> natural and societal assets, <strong>in</strong>dividually and collectively.<br />

Topics with<strong>in</strong> the discipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> bush<strong>fire</strong> science and <strong>management</strong> are numerous and complex. If the<br />

knowledge needed <strong>for</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med decisions had already been acquired, and if the conceptual<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g necessary <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med application <strong>of</strong> knowledge had already been ga<strong>in</strong>ed, then<br />

matters <strong>of</strong> contention would appear to be readily resolved. However, there is still much to learn<br />

and the debate <strong>in</strong>volves wider matters, such as: government priorities and budgets; what different<br />

groups <strong>in</strong> our society consider to be assets (a reflection <strong>of</strong> their values); the methods and speed <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>fire</strong> suppression; land-use plann<strong>in</strong>g; the nature and speed <strong>of</strong> recovery after major events; and how<br />

landscapes and their components respond to <strong>fire</strong>s.<br />

Responses by authorities and landowners to these issues usually <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> the landscape,<br />

through <strong>fire</strong> suppression and fuel manipulation. These are <strong>in</strong>extricably l<strong>in</strong>ked with the land use<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g considered. A farmer’s approach to fuel <strong>management</strong> is likely to be quite different to that <strong>of</strong><br />

a <strong>conservation</strong> manager, or that <strong>of</strong> an urban-<strong>in</strong>terface dweller, because <strong>of</strong> the differences <strong>in</strong> assets<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g considered and the resources available to them.<br />

Given that the range <strong>of</strong> bush<strong>fire</strong> issues is so large, no short publication such as this can address all <strong>of</strong><br />

them. Here, the purpose is to present and expla<strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the ideas underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>fire</strong> <strong>management</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>conservation</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>digenous organisms (<strong>biodiversity</strong>) present <strong>in</strong> public <strong>conservation</strong> reserves.<br />

This may <strong>in</strong>volve cont<strong>in</strong>ual attempts to elim<strong>in</strong>ate exotic, naturalised species. Thus the emphasis<br />

here is the effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> and fuel <strong>management</strong> on native plant and animal species <strong>in</strong> reserves; such<br />

<strong>management</strong> takes place with<strong>in</strong> the general context <strong>of</strong> the protection <strong>of</strong> human life and property.<br />

Fire (and fuel) <strong>management</strong> is a difficult and contentious practice. Fires can escape reserve boundaries<br />

and create problems <strong>in</strong> adjacent landhold<strong>in</strong>gs. The reverse can also be true. Outside, but adjacent<br />

to, a reserve there may be different landscape objectives and different impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong>s on those<br />

objectives. Land just outside the reserve boundary may be owned by another public agency or by<br />

private landholders – the extreme be<strong>in</strong>g an urban <strong>in</strong>terface. Neighbour<strong>in</strong>g land uses affect reserve<br />

<strong>management</strong>.<br />

Fire <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong>volves, among other th<strong>in</strong>gs, preparation <strong>for</strong> unplanned (wild) <strong>fire</strong>s. Networks <strong>of</strong><br />

tracks and trails, prescribed burn<strong>in</strong>g and graz<strong>in</strong>g are common themes <strong>of</strong> preparedness, but are also<br />

items <strong>for</strong> heated discussion. These topics are covered <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapters.<br />

There are no easy answers to the problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> <strong>conservation</strong> <strong>in</strong> public<br />

reserves. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> is usually <strong>in</strong>complete; knowledge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teractions between<br />

the elements <strong>of</strong> particular <strong>biodiversity</strong> arrays is <strong>in</strong>adequate; techniques <strong>for</strong> the <strong>fire</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong> are cont<strong>in</strong>ually be<strong>in</strong>g updated; and unplanned <strong>fire</strong> occurrence is probabilistic. However,<br />

alternatives are presented <strong>for</strong> consideration and reasons support<strong>in</strong>g or not support<strong>in</strong>g them given<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st the background <strong>of</strong> a rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g literature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!