26.03.2013 Views

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> <strong>conservation</strong> <strong>in</strong> reserves<br />

Note that the type <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> <strong>in</strong> this scheme is not whether or not the <strong>fire</strong> occurs <strong>in</strong> the crowns <strong>of</strong> trees<br />

(crown <strong>fire</strong>s 2 ); rather, the scheme dist<strong>in</strong>guishes <strong>fire</strong>s burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> peat (or duff) from all others. Fires<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such substrates have different <strong>fire</strong> properties to above-ground <strong>fire</strong>s <strong>in</strong> that smoulder<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is predom<strong>in</strong>ant and long last<strong>in</strong>g while flam<strong>in</strong>g is rare (Miyanishi 2001). In the case <strong>of</strong> a peat <strong>fire</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

coastal Victoria, the peat burned <strong>for</strong> three months to a depth <strong>of</strong> about 2 m, ‘the ground sank, the<br />

creek bank collapsed, and large areas <strong>of</strong> burnt peat were washed away’ (Wark 1997). Peat or duff<br />

<strong>fire</strong>s may cause r<strong>in</strong>gbark<strong>in</strong>g and death <strong>of</strong> woody plants (Gill 1995), and can destroy roots, seeds and<br />

rhizomes (Miyanishi 2001). As a result, plants establish<strong>in</strong>g after <strong>fire</strong> do so from seeds and spores, or<br />

spread vegetatively <strong>in</strong>to the area from the outside edges <strong>of</strong> the peat (Wark 1997).<br />

Seasonality<br />

An example <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> seasonality <strong>of</strong> burn<strong>in</strong>g was given, above, <strong>for</strong> the annual grass Sarga <strong>in</strong><br />

the Northern Territory. In this case, all seeds <strong>in</strong> the soil–seed pool germ<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> the early wet season<br />

when live adult plants are absent; if there is enough fuel to carry a <strong>fire</strong>, the grass seedl<strong>in</strong>gs can<br />

be killed. Other seasonal effects concern<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>gs are also known. For example, Burrows and<br />

Friend (1998) found that burn<strong>in</strong>g a south-western Australian Jarrah (Eucalyptus marg<strong>in</strong>ata) <strong>for</strong>est <strong>in</strong><br />

autumn produced a higher seedl<strong>in</strong>g density than burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g, but had ‘little affect on species<br />

composition, measured 12 months after <strong>fire</strong>’. Seasonality also affected seedl<strong>in</strong>g recruitment <strong>in</strong><br />

Australian and South African shrublands (Bond and Van Wilgen 1996, p. 100), but this effect may<br />

be conf<strong>in</strong>ed to Mediterranean-climate ecosystems (Whelan 1996, p. 100). In the Australian arid<br />

zone, however, recent research has shown that ‘seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> woody species were significantly more<br />

abundant follow<strong>in</strong>g summer than w<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>fire</strong>s’ (Wright and Clarke 2007).<br />

Seasonality may have a strong affect on flower<strong>in</strong>g (Bond and Van Wilgen 1996, p. 100–101), a recent<br />

example is Lamont et al. (2000) who reported an effect <strong>of</strong> season <strong>of</strong> burn<strong>in</strong>g on the flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grasstree Xanthorrhoea preissii <strong>in</strong> south western WA.<br />

Seasonality may also affect resprout<strong>in</strong>g behaviour. To illustrate, there is the case <strong>of</strong> a resprout<strong>in</strong>g mallee<br />

(Eucalyptus spp.) <strong>in</strong> arid western New South Wales. Frequent burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> autumn caused much higher<br />

mortality than frequent burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g (Noble 1997, p. 51), an <strong>in</strong>teractive effect with between-<strong>fire</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terval.<br />

A direct effect <strong>of</strong> season on <strong>fire</strong> on <strong>in</strong>vertebrates <strong>in</strong> Victoria has been noted. It was recommended that<br />

prescribed burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>for</strong>ests ‘should be scheduled <strong>for</strong> autumn rather than spr<strong>in</strong>g to m<strong>in</strong>imise adverse<br />

impacts on the overall <strong>in</strong>vertebrate fauna <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g litter/upper soil’ (Neumann 1992).<br />

In the subalp<strong>in</strong>e belt <strong>of</strong> south-eastern Australia, <strong>for</strong> areas with<strong>in</strong> 300 m <strong>of</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>of</strong> the<br />

endangered Corroboree Frog (Pseudophryne corroboree) – such as Sphagnum bogs – it has been<br />

recommended that any prescribed burn<strong>in</strong>g should not be carried out <strong>in</strong> autumn, as this is the time<br />

when frogs move away from these areas <strong>in</strong>to the surround<strong>in</strong>g vegetation (Osborne 2001).<br />

Between-<strong>fire</strong> Interval<br />

Most explanations <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong>-regime effects have been related to between-<strong>fire</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval (see Chapter 5<br />

also). If <strong>in</strong>tervals fall short <strong>of</strong> reproductive age, then local ext<strong>in</strong>ction will result sooner or later if there<br />

is no other <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> regeneration. If <strong>in</strong>tervals are too long and a species with no stored seed relies<br />

on bare earth <strong>for</strong> establishment, then <strong>fire</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervals greater than the life span will also cause local<br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction.<br />

There has been an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g realisation that variation <strong>in</strong> between-<strong>fire</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval, around a mean<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval, may be important to some species. Indeed it is expected that <strong>in</strong> any <strong>fire</strong> regime there will be<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> all the components. The nature <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval has been the most studied; this<br />

variation is explored <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5. However, it is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that the variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked to biological responses (e.g. habitat <strong>of</strong> animals by Mackey et al. 2001), and that time s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>fire</strong><br />

is a common way <strong>of</strong> express<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> biota (e.g. Gill 1999a). The nature <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval<br />

and time s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>fire</strong> is explored <strong>in</strong> later chapters.<br />

2 Crown <strong>fire</strong>s are seen to be a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>fire</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />

Fire and adaptive <strong>management</strong> 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!