26.03.2013 Views

STANDARD - Survey Instrument Antique Center!

STANDARD - Survey Instrument Antique Center!

STANDARD - Survey Instrument Antique Center!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

Care of Telescope Lenses.<br />

As dust and moisture, as well as perspiration from the hands, will settle on the<br />

surface of the lenses of a telescope, it becomes necessary that they should be<br />

cleaned at times. A neglect to keep the lenses free from any film, scratches, etc.,<br />

greatly impairs the claar sight through the telescope. To remove the dimness.,<br />

produced by such a film, proceed thus : Brush each lens carefully with a camel's<br />

hair brush, wipe gently with a clean piece of chamois leather moistened with alcohol,<br />

and wipe dry using a clean part of the chamois skin on every portion of the<br />

lens, to avoid grinding and scratching. When perfectly transparent brush again<br />

to remove any fiber that may adhere to the lens. The tubes in which the lenses fit<br />

should be brushed, and if damp should be dried ; this done, restore each lens to<br />

its original place as marked. To remove dampness in the main tube of the telescope,<br />

take out the eye-piece, cover the open end with cloth and leave the instrument<br />

in a dry room for some time.<br />

If an instrument has been exposed to a damp atmosphere, or water has penetrated<br />

the telescope, moisture may settle between the crown and flint glass of<br />

which the object-glass is composed. If such is the case expose the instrument to<br />

the sun for a few hours, but if in the winter, leave it in a warm room some distance<br />

from the stove, the moisture will then generally evaporate. However, if not successful,<br />

unscrew the object-glass from the telescope, and heat it slightly over a<br />

stove or open fire. If a film settles between these glasses nothing can be done except<br />

sending the instrument to the maker. The two glasses form one lens only<br />

and must not be disturbed, as upon their relation to each other the definition and<br />

achromaticity of the telescope depends. Much depends also on the stability, with<br />

which these lenses are mounted in their cell, as any looseness between them or the<br />

cell will affect the adjustment of line of collimation. Of course, if at any time the<br />

object-glass has been unscrewed from the telescope, this latter adjustment must<br />

again be verified before the instrument is used.<br />

Additional Instructions concerning the Care of<br />

Telescope Lenses, etc.<br />

Ever since the introduction of the high power in the telescopes of geodetic instruments,<br />

now used by the best makers, complaints are frequently made of<br />

the loss of light in such telescopes and of the hazy appearance of objects<br />

viewed through the in, the latter in particular when an instrument has seen service<br />

in the field for some time. Now, while the loss of light is wholly due to the greater<br />

power as compared with the low powers formerly in vogue, and to the use of erecting<br />

eye-pieces (see page 31), the "haziness" is produced principally by films<br />

of dirt, settled on or between the lenses of a telescope, and becomes even more<br />

marked as more lenses are used in a telescope.<br />

Perhaps it is proper to say here, that when comparisons are made between low<br />

and high-powered telescopes of geodetic instruments, other things being equal, the<br />

first named, as a rule, will incite favor, because, as in spy-glasses, the image of an<br />

object seen through them has a brilliancy never attained by telescopes of higher<br />

power. But, whenever the results of stadia work, or fine levelling, as obtained with<br />

the more powerful telescope, are compared with those obtained by a lower power,<br />

it will be found that, though less brilliant, the defining power of a high-powered<br />

telescope is superior to the other within the customary range of distances had in<br />

the ordinary engineer's and surveyor's practice,<br />

On the other hand, owing to the less amount of light with high powers, it is<br />

necessary that the fine qualities of the superior lenses required for them should be<br />

preserved, and on this account a more frequent inspection and a more careful<br />

treatment of them is needed than when lower powers are used, inasmuch as the<br />

least impairment of these lenses by films, or dust, etc., will reduce the defining<br />

power accordingly. A little extra care, as consequent upon the use of high-powered<br />

lenses, is, therefore, imperative, but in so doing one is more than compensated by the<br />

satisfaction of having a finer and more penetrating telescope.<br />

To prevent an untimely settling of a film on the lenses of a telescope, and particularly<br />

that apt to form on the inner surfaces of the lenses composing an objectglass<br />

that has not been cemented together such film being so fatal in an objectglass<br />

because it cannot ordinarily be reached and without disarranging the cross-wire<br />

adjustments the treatment of an instrument should be strictly in accordance with<br />

the instructions given under " Prevention better than Cure," page 17. Unless these<br />

conditions are complied with, the greater efficacy of a telescope composed of superior<br />

lenses will be entirely lost.<br />

Upon finding that, after carefully cleaning the object-glass and the lenses of the<br />

eye-piece, the telescope is not as clear as when first received from the maker, then<br />

the cause of it is generally a film between the lenses of the object-glass wo take<br />

for granted that the lenses are not scratched or otherwise impaired but, as a rule,<br />

it takes several years (with carelul use sometimes many years) before such a film

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!