Integrating Southwest Power Pool Wind to Southeast Electricity ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM: (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR (B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT. REFERENCE HEREIN TO ANY SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL PRODUCT, PROCESS, OR SERVICE BY ITS TRADE NAME, TRADEMARK, MANUFACTURER, OR OTHERWISE, DOES NOT NECESSARILY CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY ITS ENDORSEMENT, RECOMMENDATION, OR FAVORING BY EPRI.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded through the Department of Energy FOA 009 DE-EE0001377. The Principal Investigators for this study were as follows: Daniel Brooks, EPRI Aidan Tuohy, EPRI Sidart Deb, LCG Consulting Srinivas Jampani, LCG Consulting Brendan Kirby, Consultant Jack King, Consultant The following utilities/RTOs provided tremendous support to the project including provision of system data, review and feedback on models, review and feedback on analytical and simulation results, and review and feedback on project reports: Entergy Corporation Oglethorpe Power Company Southern Company Southwest Power Pool Tennessee Valley Authority It is noted that that the active engagement and participation of these companies does not indicate endorsement of all results presented. While numerous staff participated from some of these organizations, we would like to especially thank the following individuals for their participation and leadership throughout the project: Jim Lanning, Entergy Roger Mills, Entergy Rich Clark, Oglethorpe David Marshall, Southern Doug McLaughlin, Southern Jay Caspary, SPP Eric Burkey, SPP Phillip Wigington, TVA DeJim Lowe, TVA In addition, Stan Hadley also provided valuable insights to the project team through separate funding from the Department of Energy. iii
Page 1: DOE: Integrating Southwest Power Po
Page 6 and 7: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This DOE-funded p
Page 8 and 9: Summary of average regulation requi
Page 10 and 11: generation in the 2022 Non-RES case
Page 12 and 13: System and Cost Impacts of High Win
Page 14 and 15: Figure 6-6: Individual Coal Capacit
Page 17 and 18: 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Proje
Page 19 and 20: 2 REPRESENTATION OF TRANSMISSION NE
Page 21 and 22: participants the possibility of a r
Page 23: assumption is affecting specific di
Page 26 and 27: Table 3-1 Wind energy targets for e
Page 28 and 29: site selection could have congregat
Page 30 and 31: Wind Production (MW) Wind Productio
Page 32 and 33: Wind Delivery (MW) 12000 10000 8000
Page 34 and 35: 1. Regulation is required to cover
Page 36 and 37: The polynomial shown in Equation 3
Page 38 and 39: Regulation (MW) Figure 3-12 Summary
Page 41 and 42: 4 HIGH WIND TRANSFER SCENARIO DECRI
Page 43 and 44: 5 HIGH WIND TRANSFER CASE RESULTS T
Page 45 and 46: decreasing smaller amounts. It is i
Page 47 and 48: Coal 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 GasOil 0.7
Page 49 and 50: Figure 5-3 Average hourly generatio
Page 51 and 52: Figure 5-6: Average hourly generati
Page 53 and 54: SBA. More details on these types of
Page 55 and 56:
Figure 5-8: Total production costs
Page 57 and 58:
The flow chart shown in Figure 5-9
Page 59 and 60:
Table 5-10 shows the difference in
Page 61 and 62:
more likely to be turned off during
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 5-13: Average Regulation up
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 5-16: Average Spinning reser
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 5-18: SBA Capacity Factors b
Page 69 and 70:
Figure 5-20: Capacity Factors for S
Page 71 and 72:
Unit Startups Changing the balancin
Page 73 and 74:
Gas Price Sensitivity Case Results
Page 75 and 76:
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED NEXT
Page 77 and 78:
generation characteristics across r
Page 79:
overstates the ability of the syste
Page 82 and 83:
Figure 6-2: Individual coal capacit
Page 84 and 85:
in the 22% to 50% in Scenario 2. Th
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 6-8: individual coal capacit
Page 88 and 89:
able to carry some of the reserve t
Page 90:
Export Control Restrictions Access
show all

Integrating Southwest Power Pool Wind to Southeast Electricity ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?