28.03.2013 Views

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANNEXES<br />

19. Role <strong>of</strong> surveyors:<br />

(a) The <strong>India</strong>n Institute <strong>of</strong> Insurance Surveyors <strong>and</strong> Loss Assessors should be given<br />

statutory recognition as a pr<strong>of</strong>essional body responsible for the licensing <strong>and</strong><br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> surveyors <strong>and</strong> loss assessors.<br />

(b) In order to protect the interests <strong>of</strong> consumers, the legal framework should allow<br />

them to appoint a surveyor in addition to the surveyor required to be appointed<br />

by the insurer. The insurer will be required to consider both reports<br />

before making a decision on the claim.<br />

20. The law should empower the regulator to specify the types <strong>of</strong> permitted <strong>and</strong> restricted<br />

assignments <strong>of</strong> insurance policies. The insurer will not have the discretion<br />

to refuse to record an assignment that is made in accordance with the regulations.<br />

Competition issues<br />

21. The legal framework governing LIC should be at par with the laws applicable to all<br />

other life insurance companies. In particular, there should be no sovereign guarantee<br />

for the policies <strong>of</strong> LIC. The status <strong>of</strong> LIC should be changed from a statutory corporation<br />

to a <strong>Government</strong> company governed under st<strong>and</strong>ard company law provisions.<br />

22. There is a need for encouraging competition in the reinsurance sector by adopting<br />

the following measures:<br />

(a) do away with the m<strong>and</strong>atory requirement placed upon general insurance<br />

companies to reinsure a portion <strong>of</strong> their business with General Insurnace Council<br />

(GIC);<br />

(b) remove barriers which prevent <strong>India</strong>n insurance companies from doing business<br />

with global reinsurers, subject only to prudential regulation requirements;<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

(c) create an enabling framework for the entry <strong>of</strong> global reinsurance firms, including<br />

Lloyds, in the <strong>India</strong>n reinsurance sector.<br />

23. Competition policy should play an effective role in ensuring that government schemes<br />

do not create an uneven playing field between state-owned <strong>and</strong> private insurance<br />

companies.<br />

Resolution <strong>and</strong> systemic relevance<br />

24. The law should contain appropriate resolution mechanisms to deal with failing<br />

insurance firms, including provisions for enhanced supervision <strong>and</strong> the option <strong>of</strong><br />

transferring the business <strong>of</strong> the failing insurer to a solvent insurer. These mechanisms<br />

should be applicable to both life <strong>and</strong> non-life insurers.<br />

25. There is a need to create a compensation scheme to protect policyholders from<br />

the inability <strong>of</strong> an insurer to meet its financial obligations <strong>and</strong> to minimise the taxpayer’s<br />

exposure to the failure <strong>of</strong> insurance firms. The design <strong>of</strong> the policyholder<br />

compensation scheme should be decided under the resolution framework being<br />

designed by the Commission.<br />

26. It should be the regulator’s responsibility to assess the systemic importance <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

insurance firms. Additional supervisory <strong>and</strong> resolution tools will need to<br />

be employed in respect <strong>of</strong> those insurance companies that are found to be systemically<br />

important.<br />

Unregulated areas <strong>of</strong> insurance<br />

27. Establishments covered by ESIC should have the option to opt out <strong>of</strong> the medical<br />

benefit facilities provided under the scheme <strong>and</strong> obtain group health insurance<br />

coverage <strong>of</strong>fered by an insurance company, if they are able to obtain similar benefits<br />

at a similar cost . In such cases, a proportionate amount <strong>of</strong> the total contribution<br />

payable to ESIC that relates to the medical benefits provided under the scheme will<br />

be used as the premium for obtaining the insurance policy.<br />

FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION 169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!