28.03.2013 Views

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

The difficulty in addressing financial sector regulation on a holistic basis has given<br />

rise to a rapidly growing shadow financial sector. This includes shadow banking <strong>and</strong><br />

other shadow financial service providers who collect huge amounts <strong>of</strong> money from the<br />

public, particularly the retail investors, leading to fundamental concerns on consumer<br />

protection <strong>and</strong> at times generating issues <strong>of</strong> financial stability <strong>and</strong> systemic risk. There<br />

have been increased incidences <strong>of</strong> such entities operating between the regulatory boundaries<br />

at their will, defrauding investors in the name <strong>of</strong> emus, plantations, <strong>and</strong> pyramid<br />

formations. Unless issues <strong>of</strong> regulatory grey areas <strong>and</strong> governance are addressed early in<br />

a systematic manner, all these issues are likely to aggravate in the future, given that innovations<br />

on products, practices <strong>and</strong> organisational structures very <strong>of</strong>ten happen outside<br />

regulatory boundaries.<br />

The setting up <strong>of</strong> the FSDC <strong>and</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> the Commission itself has been a clear<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> the limitations <strong>of</strong> the existing statutory <strong>and</strong> organisational arrangements.<br />

While the FSDC as an apex council for regulatory co-ordination <strong>and</strong> financial sector development,<br />

was an interim response, the Commission, m<strong>and</strong>ated to rewrite <strong>and</strong> clean<br />

up the financial sector legislations <strong>and</strong> architecture, was to provide the long-term institutional<br />

answer to the problems haunting the current institutional ethos <strong>of</strong> the financial<br />

sector. This is what has been attempted in this report.<br />

1.5.3. Financial inclusion <strong>and</strong> literacy<br />

Financial inclusion is a major policy objective that <strong>India</strong> has been trying to achieve over<br />

the years. The Commission has noted that inclusion, even in terms <strong>of</strong> basic banking accounts,<br />

has reached only about half the population; in terms <strong>of</strong> financial instruments<br />

such as insurance <strong>and</strong> securities, inclusion is far limited. Though the level <strong>of</strong> inclusion<br />

should depend on the type <strong>of</strong> financial products, financial services, such as basic banking<br />

<strong>and</strong> pure insurance products, should reach almost all; other products, enabling risk management<br />

<strong>and</strong> income generation, should reach a sizeable population so that the benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong> modern finance are available to a large part <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

The Commission debated issues emanating from m<strong>and</strong>ated development <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

inclusion as a regulatory responsibility. While expert opinion is divided on the subject,<br />

the underlying line <strong>of</strong> thinking has been that regulatory m<strong>and</strong>ating has to be avoided<br />

because the regulatory approach should be to provide an enabling framework wherein<br />

service providers would be able to use innovative approaches, including usage <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

technologies, in achieving the desired macro objectives. Moreover, micro-level targeting<br />

<strong>and</strong> licencing approaches may be too slow in achieving this objective.<br />

1.5.4. Financial globalisation <strong>and</strong> lessons from the crisis<br />

No major economy in the world today can be viewed in isolation from the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world. Given the size <strong>and</strong> the growing magnitude <strong>of</strong> interaction – in terms <strong>of</strong> trade, services,<br />

<strong>and</strong> capital flows – <strong>and</strong> the greater openness to globalisation, <strong>India</strong> is in a different<br />

economic milieu today than it was two decades ago. <strong>India</strong> is virtually part <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>of</strong><br />

globalised finance <strong>and</strong> is learning to walk, negotiating the strong currents both positive<br />

<strong>and</strong> negative, generated by the forces <strong>of</strong> financial globalisation.<br />

Negative aspects <strong>of</strong> financial globalisation <strong>and</strong> run away innovations in certain parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world resulted in the global financial crisis <strong>of</strong> 2008. The world has learnt a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> lessons from this crisis. The Commission, through its research, interactions with regulatory<br />

authorities <strong>and</strong> experts from different parts <strong>of</strong> the world, <strong>and</strong> through <strong>India</strong>’s own<br />

experience during the crisis, has understood the need for a carefully calibrated regulatory<br />

approach to address the limitations <strong>of</strong> the market, particularly its tendency to travel too<br />

fast <strong>and</strong> become too complex, both in terms <strong>of</strong> product <strong>and</strong> organisational innovations.<br />

FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!