28.03.2013 Views

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MICRO-PRUDENTIAL REGULATION<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recommendations</strong> 6.7 Regulation <strong>of</strong> governance, management <strong>and</strong> internal<br />

controls<br />

The regulator will have the following powers in connection with improving governance <strong>and</strong> management:<br />

1. Regulating norms <strong>of</strong> corporate governance;<br />

2. Regulating the structure <strong>of</strong> management incentives;<br />

3. Regulating risk management systems;<br />

4. Regulating internal controls <strong>and</strong> internal audit;<br />

5. Regulating appointment <strong>of</strong> qualified auditors <strong>and</strong> actuaries; <strong>and</strong><br />

6. Regulating outsourcing <strong>and</strong> appointment <strong>of</strong> agents.<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recommendations</strong> 6.8 Monitoring <strong>and</strong> supervision<br />

The regulator will have the following powers in connection with monitoring <strong>and</strong> supervision:<br />

1. M<strong>and</strong>ating disclosures to consumers <strong>and</strong> the market;<br />

2. M<strong>and</strong>ating reporting to the regulator;<br />

3. Conducting on-site supervision;<br />

4. Investigating powers; <strong>and</strong><br />

5. Developing the capability to conduct analytics on the information received from regulated persons <strong>and</strong> other<br />

resources.<br />

6.4.5. Monitoring <strong>and</strong> supervision <strong>of</strong> regulated persons<br />

These instruments can be used to improve monitoring <strong>and</strong> supervision by regulators, as<br />

well as, by market participants. The role <strong>of</strong> monitoring by market participants is complex.<br />

Since monitoring has a public good nature, the Commission proposes an approach<br />

that not only allows regulators to facilitate monitoring by market participants, but also<br />

empowers regulators to fulfil monitoring <strong>and</strong> supervisory functions on their own.<br />

Monitoring <strong>and</strong> supervision can take many forms. Monitoring can involve disclosure<br />

<strong>of</strong> annual statements <strong>and</strong> other reporting. Regulated persons may also be required to obtain,<br />

maintain <strong>and</strong> disclose a current credit rating from an approved credit rating agency<br />

(see Table 6.8).<br />

For regulated persons that are under the regulatory purview <strong>of</strong> more than one regulator,<br />

there should be a requirement for the regulators to co-operate to ensure optimal supervision.<br />

This may entail conglomerate supervision or supervision <strong>of</strong> a single regulated<br />

person undertaking multiple activities. The Commission does not prescribe any specific<br />

mode <strong>of</strong> co-operation, <strong>and</strong> the regulators will be expected to develop co-operation<br />

through mutual underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> agreement.<br />

6.5. Principles to guide the use <strong>of</strong> powers<br />

Micro-prudential regulation, like all forms <strong>of</strong> regulation, imposes costs on the economy.<br />

Regulation is optimal when it achieves a desired objective while imposing the smallest<br />

possible distortion. As such, the draft Code enunciates principles that guide the use <strong>of</strong><br />

powers instead <strong>of</strong> being a simple grant <strong>of</strong> powers. (see Table 6.9).<br />

Distortions can take various forms. For example, regulations that focus excessively on<br />

products rather than underlying functions could encourage regulatory arbitrage between<br />

various products. Two different products that achieve similar pay<strong>of</strong>fs between risks <strong>and</strong><br />

rewards should be regulated in similar ways.<br />

PRINCIPLE 1. Any obligation imposed on regulated persons should be proportionate to-<br />

62 FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!