28.03.2013 Views

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONSUMER PROTECTION<br />

using or disclosing any personal information belonging to consumers, except to the extent required<br />

for the purposes <strong>of</strong> carrying out their business or expressly permitted under the draft Code.<br />

The draft Code also provides safeguards for consumers to be able to access their personal information<br />

held by service providers <strong>and</strong> ensure that the information is accurate <strong>and</strong> complete (see<br />

Table 5.7).<br />

5. Requirement <strong>of</strong> fair disclosure<br />

Information asymmetry between consumers <strong>and</strong> financial firms affects the quality <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

decisions made by consumers. This asymmetry needs to be addressed by imposing a positive<br />

obligation on financial service providers to provide consumers with all the information that is<br />

relevant for them to make informed decisions. This includes disclosures required to be made<br />

prior to entering a financial contract <strong>and</strong> continuing disclosures regarding material changes to<br />

previously provided information or the status or performance <strong>of</strong> a financial product.<br />

Given the wide array <strong>of</strong> financial services being covered under the draft Code, the regulator may<br />

find it useful to specify different disclosure requirements for various financial products <strong>and</strong> services.<br />

With this objective, the draft Code empowers the regulator to make differing provisions<br />

regarding the types <strong>of</strong> information required to be disclosed, the manner in which disclosures<br />

must be made <strong>and</strong> the appropriate time-periods for making required disclosures.<br />

6. Redress <strong>of</strong> complaints<br />

The Commission envisages a two-tier approach for the redress <strong>of</strong> consumer complaints: first at<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the financial service provider <strong>and</strong> subsequently at the level <strong>of</strong> the redress agency (for<br />

retail consumers).<br />

If a consumer is dissatisfied with a financial product or service, the consumer should first take up<br />

the issue with the relevant financial service provider. For this purpose, the draft Code requires all<br />

financial service providers to have in place an effective mechanism to redress complaints from<br />

consumers. They will also be obliged to inform consumers about their right to seek redress <strong>and</strong><br />

the process to be followed for it. The regulator may supplement these requirements by laying<br />

down specific details <strong>of</strong> the process to be followed by financial service providers to receive <strong>and</strong><br />

redress complaints.<br />

In certain cases the regulator may also envisage an additional layer <strong>of</strong> grievance assessment to<br />

take place after, or instead <strong>of</strong>, the service provider’s own grievance redress mechanism <strong>and</strong> before<br />

the complaint goes to the redress agency. The stock exchange arbitration process would be an<br />

example <strong>of</strong> such an arrangement.<br />

5.5. Additional protections for retail consumers<br />

The Commission believes that the following rights <strong>and</strong> protections should be available to<br />

retail consumers over <strong>and</strong> above the protections available to consumers generally. These<br />

protections are needed due to the generally low levels <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience <strong>of</strong><br />

retail consumers.<br />

1. Assessment <strong>of</strong> suitability<br />

Retail consumers may <strong>of</strong>ten be in a situation where they are not able to fully appreciate the features<br />

or implications <strong>of</strong> a financial product, even with full disclosure <strong>of</strong> information to them. This<br />

makes a strong case for a thorough suitability assessment <strong>of</strong> the products being sold to them.<br />

The draft Code provides this protection by requiring that any person who advises a retail consumer<br />

in relation to the purchase <strong>of</strong> a financial product or service must obtain relevant information<br />

about the needs <strong>and</strong> circumstances <strong>of</strong> the consumer before making a recommendation to<br />

the consumer (see Table 5.8).<br />

2. Dealing with conflict <strong>of</strong> interests<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the best ways to ensure good consumer protection is to align the incentives <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

service providers with those <strong>of</strong> consumers <strong>and</strong> ensure that in case <strong>of</strong> a conflict, the interests <strong>of</strong><br />

consumers take precedence. The draft Code incorporates this principle <strong>of</strong> prioritising the interests<br />

<strong>of</strong> retail consumers over those <strong>of</strong> the provider. It also requires advisors to inform retail consumers<br />

about any conflicted remuneration they st<strong>and</strong> to receive, which may influence the advice<br />

being given to the retail consumer. The regulator may, in addition, specify the nature, type <strong>and</strong><br />

48 FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!