04.04.2013 Views

Herbal medicinal products in the European Union - AESGP

Herbal medicinal products in the European Union - AESGP

Herbal medicinal products in the European Union - AESGP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

clarification, <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Commission issued a call for tender for a study on herbal<br />

<strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical sector [6].<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> objectives of <strong>the</strong> study were described as follows:<br />

• to clarify <strong>the</strong> current legal situation for herbal <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> <strong>in</strong> each Member<br />

State with respect to <strong>the</strong> implementation of <strong>the</strong> requirements of Council Directives<br />

65/65/EEC, 75/318/EEC and 75/319/EEC;<br />

• to compare actual practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment of quality, safety and efficacy of herbal<br />

<strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Member States, with particular emphasis on <strong>the</strong> application<br />

of <strong>the</strong> derogation <strong>in</strong> Article 4.8 (a) (ii) of Council Directive 65/65/EEC;<br />

• for <strong>the</strong> purpose of mutual recognition under Council Directive 75/319/EEC, to evaluate<br />

<strong>the</strong> consequences of possible divergence <strong>in</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> legal position or <strong>the</strong> assessment<br />

of herbal <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong>; and<br />

• to make recommendations on how to best safeguard public health while allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

free movement of herbal <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>.<br />

<strong>AESGP</strong> was selected to carry out <strong>the</strong> study and started work on 1 January 1998. In<br />

accordance with <strong>the</strong> contract for <strong>the</strong> study, an Interim Report was provided on 29 May 1998<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Draft F<strong>in</strong>al Report was submitted on 30 September 1998.<br />

IV. CURRENT LEGAL SITUATION OF HERBAL MEDICINAL<br />

PRODUCTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION<br />

IV.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition of Medic<strong>in</strong>al Products<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 19651, a <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> product is<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed as “any substance or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of substances presented for treat<strong>in</strong>g or prevent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

disease <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs or animals”. This Directive fur<strong>the</strong>r states that “any substance o r<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of substances which may be adm<strong>in</strong>istered to human be<strong>in</strong>gs or animals with a view<br />

to mak<strong>in</strong>g a medical diagnosis or to restor<strong>in</strong>g, correct<strong>in</strong>g or modify<strong>in</strong>g physiological functions<br />

<strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs or <strong>in</strong> animals is likewise considered a <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> product”. Article 3 clarifies<br />

that no <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> product may be marketed <strong>in</strong> a Member State unless an authorisation has<br />

been issued by <strong>the</strong> competent authority of that Member State.<br />

IV.2 <strong>Herbal</strong> Products Not Regarded as Medic<strong>in</strong>al Products<br />

Apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of a <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> product laid down <strong>in</strong> Council Directive 65/65/EEC to<br />

herbal preparations, has led to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that <strong>the</strong>se preparations are not considered as<br />

<strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> if <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong>tended to be used as food, cosmetics, etc. and are not<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended or presented for treat<strong>in</strong>g, prevent<strong>in</strong>g or diagnos<strong>in</strong>g diseases or restor<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

correct<strong>in</strong>g or modify<strong>in</strong>g physiological functions. <strong>Herbal</strong> preparations that are not <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong><br />

<strong>products</strong> do not require a market<strong>in</strong>g authorisation from <strong>the</strong> competent authority.<br />

Homeopathic preparations, covered by Council Directive 92/73/EEC of 22 September 19922, are<br />

likewise not considered as herbal <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong>.<br />

Although Council Directive 65/65/EEC def<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> basic criteria for a <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> product, it is<br />

<strong>in</strong> many cases not so easy to draw <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> from non<strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong><br />

<strong>products</strong>. This dilemma is illustrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> disparate def<strong>in</strong>itions of herbal<br />

<strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> used by each Member State.<br />

IV.3 Requirements for Market<strong>in</strong>g Authorisation<br />

Council Directive 65/65/EEC establishes that proof of quality, safety and efficacy is a precondition<br />

for deliver<strong>in</strong>g a market<strong>in</strong>g authorisation for a <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> product. The specific<br />

requirements for documentation and expert reports on quality, safety and efficacy are<br />

1 Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on <strong>the</strong> approximation of provisions laid down b y<br />

law, regulation or adm<strong>in</strong>istrative action relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> (OJ 22 of 9.2.1965, p. 369).<br />

2 Council Directive 92/73/EEC of 22 September 1992, widen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scope of Directives 65/65/EEC and<br />

75/319/EEC on <strong>the</strong> approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

action relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> and lay<strong>in</strong>g down additional provisions on homeopathic<br />

<strong>medic<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>products</strong> (OJ L 297 of 13.10.1992, p. 8).<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!