DARLING RIVERINE PLAINS BIOREGION Background Report
DARLING RIVERINE PLAINS BIOREGION Background Report
DARLING RIVERINE PLAINS BIOREGION Background Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16/08/02 Darling Riverine Plains Bioregion <strong>Background</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Contamination of groundwater by pesticides has been recorded in the lower Namoi Valley but<br />
monitoring of pesticides in groundwater is limited and further sampling and monitoring is<br />
required to assess accurately levels of contamination (EPA 2000).<br />
7.2 LISTED AND POTENTIAL THREATENING PROCESSES<br />
Key threatening processes listed under the TSC Act are those that threaten, or may have the<br />
capability of threatening, the survival or evolutionary development of species, populations or<br />
ecological communities. Eight of the key threatening processes (KTPs) listed under Schedule<br />
3 of the TSC Act affect the ecology of the DRP bioregion. A preliminary determinations has<br />
also been made by the NSW Scientific Committee to support the listing of the ‘competition<br />
with feral honeybees Apis mellifera’ as a KTP (NPWS 2001A).<br />
The Fisheries Management Act 1994 (NSW) (FMA 1994) also lists key threatening processes.<br />
The NSW Fisheries Scientific Committee has made final recommendations to list<br />
‘degradation of native riparian vegetation along New South Wales watercourses’, ‘removal of<br />
large woody debris’, and ‘introduction of fish to fresh waters within a river catchment outside<br />
their natural range’ as key threatening processes under the FMA 1994. The Fisheries<br />
Scientific Committee has also made a recommendation to list ‘installation and operation of<br />
instream structures that modify flow’ as a key threatening process under the FMA 1994.<br />
The EPBC Act lists nine KTPs of relevance to the DRP. Some of these identify the same<br />
process as listed on the TSC Act but may define them differently (Environment Australia<br />
2001c).<br />
7.2.1 Listed Threatening Processes<br />
High frequency fire<br />
‘High frequency fire resulting in the disruption of life cycle processes in plants and animals<br />
and loss of vegetation structure and composition’ has been listed as a key threatening process<br />
under the TSC Act. The NSW Scientific Committee defines high frequency fire as ‘two or<br />
more successive fires close enough together in time to interfere with or limit the ability of<br />
plants or animals to recruit new individuals into a population, or for plants to build up a<br />
seedbank sufficient in size to maintain the population through the next fire’ (NPWS 2001A).<br />
The rate of decrease of woody vegetation across New South Wales between 1990 and 1995<br />
due to bushfires has been estimated to be 33 520 ha / year. 66% of this area of woody<br />
vegetation is expected to regenerate quickly (Bureau of Rural Sciences 1999).<br />
Threatened species known from the DRP likely to be affected by high frequency fires include<br />
Swainsona plagiotropis, glossy black-cockatoo, malleefowl, rufous bettong, black-striped<br />
wallaby, spotted-tailed quoll and squirrel glider (NPWS 2001a). Species not yet listed but<br />
occurring in the DRP that could become threatened by high frequency fires include feathertail<br />
glider (Acrobates pygmaeus), common ringtail possum, yellow-footed antechinus (Antechinus<br />
flavipes) and sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps) (NPWS 2001a).<br />
Anthropogenic climate change<br />
Anthropogenic climate change is listed as a key threatening process under the TSC Act and<br />
the EPBC Act. Natural climate change has been a major ecological driving force throughout<br />
geological history but there is evidence to suggest that modification of the environment by<br />
121