08.04.2013 Views

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 Optimal cloners for coherent states<br />

Normalization of ω imposes ω( ) = tr[ω1]+ω0 = 1 and positivity requires that ω0 ≥ 0<br />

and ω1 ≥ 0. An intuitive interpretation would suggest that ω0 is the probability for<br />

a system in state ω to beat infinity, 2 while ω1/(1 − ω0) is the normalized density<br />

operator describing the nonsingular part of ω. Note that the fidelity of ω <strong>with</strong> respect<br />

to a coherent state α is determined by the compact operator |α〉〈α| as<br />

f ω, |α〉〈α| = ω |α〉〈α| = tr ω1|α〉〈α| , (3.9)<br />

which is independent of ω0. Hence one can expect that the optimization of the cloner<br />

output state reduces the weight at infinity ω0.<br />

In order to obtain a more rigorous argument, we introduce the tensor product<br />

subalgebra D⊗n ⊂ B H⊗n generated by the identity as well as all operators of the<br />

form ⊗ · · · ⊗ C ⊗ · · · ⊗ which have a compact operator C in a single tensor<br />

factor. A product of such operators is characterized by the set Λ ⊂ Λn = {1, 2, . . ., n}<br />

of tensor factors <strong>with</strong> compact entry; the complement Λc = Λn \ Λ contains a factor<br />

⊗Λ c<br />

. A general element D ∈ D⊗n is thus decomposed according to<br />

D = <br />

Λ<br />

DΛ ⊗ ⊗Λc<br />

, (3.10)<br />

where DΛ is the respective compact part on the tensor factors indexed by Λ and<br />

the sum runs over all subsets of Λn. Similarly, a state ω is decomposed into parts<br />

which are labeled by a set of tensor factors Λ on which the state is normal and<br />

thus described by a density operator ωΛ; on the complement Λc , the part describes<br />

systemsat infinity. The purely singular contribution is denoted by ω∅. A part ωΛ<br />

⊗Λ′c<br />

yields nonzero expectation value for D from (3.10) only on terms DΛ ′ ⊗ for<br />

which Λ ′ ⊂ Λ because else a singular part would meet a compact operator. Hence<br />

ω(D) = ω Λ ′DΛ ′ ⊗<br />

⊗Λ′c<br />

= <br />

tr ωΛ DΛ ′ ⊗<br />

⊗Λ\Λ′<br />

. (3.11)<br />

Λ<br />

Λ ′ ⊂Λ<br />

Positivity of ω is assured if all ωΛ ≥ 0 and normalization requires <br />

Λ tr[ωΛ] = 1.<br />

This relation implies that the fidelity of the i-th clone <strong>with</strong> ω is obtained as<br />

ω(Fi) = <br />

tr <br />

ωΛ Fi| Λ , (3.12)<br />

Λ∋i<br />

where the sum runs over all Λ containing the index i and Fi| Λ is the restriction<br />

of Fi to the tensor factors Λ. For a weighted sum of such fidelities, determined by<br />

F(λ) = <br />

i λi Fi <strong>with</strong> λi ≥ 0, the expectation value is given by a sum over the above<br />

expression,<br />

ω F(λ) = <br />

tr ωΛ F(λ) <br />

. (3.13)<br />

Λ<br />

Λ<br />

2 This interpretation can be made rigorous by a correspondence between spaces of functions and<br />

spaces of operators, which allows aone-point compactificationof the phase space, i.e. the<br />

process of adjoining a point at infinity to the real vector space. By using only a single point at<br />

infinity we identify all purely singular states, which is justified since they do not contribute to<br />

fidelities as explained above. This is a main motivation in the definition of D.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!