Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems
Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems
Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.3 Covariance<br />
In the case of joint fidelity, the respective expression contains only ωΛn(Fjoint) since<br />
Fjoint = |α〉〈α| ⊗n is compact on all tensor factors.<br />
To investigate the fidelities of a possibly singular, covariant cloner T∗, consider<br />
the restriction ω = T∗(ρ)| D ⊗n of its output to D ⊗n . Denote by T∗Λ the map which<br />
takes the density operator ρ on H to T∗Λ(ρ) = ωΛ, the unique density operator<br />
on the tensor factors Λ from the decomposition of ω. Since T∗ is covariant, so is<br />
T∗Λ. However, it lacks normalization, as only the overall T∗(ρ) is normalized. To<br />
renormalize T∗Λ, we introduce the normalization operator NΛ which implements the<br />
bounded linear map ρ ↦→ tr T∗Λ(ρ) = tr[ρ NΛ] ≤ 1. As T∗Λ is covariant, NΛ has to<br />
commute <strong>with</strong> all Weyl operators and is thus a multiple of the identity, NΛ = pΛ<br />
<strong>with</strong> 0 < pΛ ≤ 1. We define by<br />
T∗Λ(ρ) = T∗Λ(ρ)/pΛ = ωΛ/pΛ<br />
(3.14)<br />
a family of normalized, covariant 1-to-|Λ| cloning transformations, where |Λ| denotes<br />
the number of elements in the set Λ. Note that the normalization constant pΛ does<br />
not depend on the input state. T∗Λ(ρ) is normal, since the output ωΛ/pΛ is a density<br />
operator. With the help of T∗Λ, the fidelity of possibly singular cloners can be<br />
expressed in terms of nonsingular cloners. For joint fidelity, we get:<br />
<br />
fjoint T∗ = fjoint T∗, |0〉〈0| <br />
by covariance of T∗<br />
<br />
= ω(Fjoint) for ω = T∗ |0〉〈0|<br />
= tr <br />
ωΛn Fjoint<br />
by (3.11), Fjoint is compact on Λn<br />
<br />
= pΛn tr |0〉〈0| Fjoint by (3.14)<br />
T∗Λn<br />
= pΛn fjoint(TΛn) by (3.1).<br />
Since 0 < pΛ ≤ 1, this fidelity is enlarged if pΛn = 1 and hence pΛ = 0 for Λ = Λn,<br />
i.e. if T∗ = T∗Λn . But this better cloner is covariant and normal, which proves (ii)<br />
and (i) for joint fidelity, where the linear combination consists of a single covariant<br />
cloner which yields normal output for all clones.<br />
For a proof of (iii), we discuss the role of zero and nonzero coefficients λi in the<br />
weighted single-copy fidelity n i=1 λi fi. If one of the weights is zero, e.g. λn = 0,<br />
the figure of merit does not care for the respective clone n. A 1-to-n cloner can thus<br />
be optimized by using the optimal, covariant 1-to-(n − 1) cloner and amending the<br />
output <strong>with</strong> an arbitrary state for the n-th output system. However, if this additional<br />
state is a normal state, the resulting cloner is not covariant (see above). If this cloner<br />
is subjected to the averaging procedure from Lemma 3.1, the averaged cloner will<br />
be covariant and hence the state of the n-th clone in its output will be singular.<br />
Consequentially, if a clone is not contained in the figure of merit, the optimal cloner<br />
is either not covariant <strong>with</strong> respect to all clones or it is covariant but singular. This<br />
proves (iii).<br />
Consider now the single-copy fidelity <strong>with</strong> nonzero weights λi > 0. We denote the<br />
respective fidelity operator by F(λ) = <br />
i λi Fi, where λ = (λ1, λ2, . . .,λn). With<br />
41