08.04.2013 Views

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3 Covariance<br />

In the case of joint fidelity, the respective expression contains only ωΛn(Fjoint) since<br />

Fjoint = |α〉〈α| ⊗n is compact on all tensor factors.<br />

To investigate the fidelities of a possibly singular, covariant cloner T∗, consider<br />

the restriction ω = T∗(ρ)| D ⊗n of its output to D ⊗n . Denote by T∗Λ the map which<br />

takes the density operator ρ on H to T∗Λ(ρ) = ωΛ, the unique density operator<br />

on the tensor factors Λ from the decomposition of ω. Since T∗ is covariant, so is<br />

T∗Λ. However, it lacks normalization, as only the overall T∗(ρ) is normalized. To<br />

renormalize T∗Λ, we introduce the normalization operator NΛ which implements the<br />

bounded linear map ρ ↦→ tr T∗Λ(ρ) = tr[ρ NΛ] ≤ 1. As T∗Λ is covariant, NΛ has to<br />

commute <strong>with</strong> all Weyl operators and is thus a multiple of the identity, NΛ = pΛ<br />

<strong>with</strong> 0 < pΛ ≤ 1. We define by<br />

T∗Λ(ρ) = T∗Λ(ρ)/pΛ = ωΛ/pΛ<br />

(3.14)<br />

a family of normalized, covariant 1-to-|Λ| cloning transformations, where |Λ| denotes<br />

the number of elements in the set Λ. Note that the normalization constant pΛ does<br />

not depend on the input state. T∗Λ(ρ) is normal, since the output ωΛ/pΛ is a density<br />

operator. With the help of T∗Λ, the fidelity of possibly singular cloners can be<br />

expressed in terms of nonsingular cloners. For joint fidelity, we get:<br />

<br />

fjoint T∗ = fjoint T∗, |0〉〈0| <br />

by covariance of T∗<br />

<br />

= ω(Fjoint) for ω = T∗ |0〉〈0|<br />

= tr <br />

ωΛn Fjoint<br />

by (3.11), Fjoint is compact on Λn<br />

<br />

= pΛn tr |0〉〈0| Fjoint by (3.14)<br />

T∗Λn<br />

= pΛn fjoint(TΛn) by (3.1).<br />

Since 0 < pΛ ≤ 1, this fidelity is enlarged if pΛn = 1 and hence pΛ = 0 for Λ = Λn,<br />

i.e. if T∗ = T∗Λn . But this better cloner is covariant and normal, which proves (ii)<br />

and (i) for joint fidelity, where the linear combination consists of a single covariant<br />

cloner which yields normal output for all clones.<br />

For a proof of (iii), we discuss the role of zero and nonzero coefficients λi in the<br />

weighted single-copy fidelity n i=1 λi fi. If one of the weights is zero, e.g. λn = 0,<br />

the figure of merit does not care for the respective clone n. A 1-to-n cloner can thus<br />

be optimized by using the optimal, covariant 1-to-(n − 1) cloner and amending the<br />

output <strong>with</strong> an arbitrary state for the n-th output system. However, if this additional<br />

state is a normal state, the resulting cloner is not covariant (see above). If this cloner<br />

is subjected to the averaging procedure from Lemma 3.1, the averaged cloner will<br />

be covariant and hence the state of the n-th clone in its output will be singular.<br />

Consequentially, if a clone is not contained in the figure of merit, the optimal cloner<br />

is either not covariant <strong>with</strong> respect to all clones or it is covariant but singular. This<br />

proves (iii).<br />

Consider now the single-copy fidelity <strong>with</strong> nonzero weights λi > 0. We denote the<br />

respective fidelity operator by F(λ) = <br />

i λi Fi, where λ = (λ1, λ2, . . .,λn). With<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!