08.04.2013 Views

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 <strong>Gaussian</strong> quantum cellular automata<br />

this out in components of µ and using the definitions of γ and σ above results in the<br />

detailed condition<br />

<br />

x,y∈µ T<br />

x · <br />

γ(x − y) + iδ(x − y)σs · µy ≥ 0 (4.6)<br />

for all µ as above. Here δ denotes the Kronecker delta <strong>with</strong> δ(x) = 1 for x = 0 and<br />

δ(x) = 0 otherwise.<br />

4.2.2 Transition rule<br />

To implement a <strong>Gaussian</strong> system, the global transition rule T has to be quasi-free,<br />

i.e. it has to map <strong>Gaussian</strong> states into <strong>Gaussian</strong> states in the Schrödinger picture.<br />

In the Heisenberg picture, this is accomplished by mapping the Weyl operators to<br />

Weyl operators subject to a symplectic transformation Γ:<br />

Clearly, the so-defined T is a homomorphism, since<br />

T W(ξ) = W(Γ ξ). (4.7)<br />

T W(ξ) T W(η) = e −iσ(Γ ξ,Γ η) W(Γ ξ + Γ η)<br />

= e −iσ(ξ,η) W(Γ ξ + Γ η) = T W(ξ) W(η) .<br />

It is also an automorphism, since as a symplectic transformation Γ is invertible.<br />

Hence together <strong>with</strong> a suitable locality condition T could indeed be the global rule of<br />

a <strong>Gaussian</strong> qca. In fact, this is the only possible configuration: any transformation<br />

Γ resulting in a homomorphism would have to be linear in the arguments of the<br />

Weyl operators and fulfill σ(Γ ξ, Γ η) = σ(ξ, η) for all ξ and η, which is exactly the<br />

definition of a symplectic transformation.<br />

As <strong>with</strong> the generalization of matrices above, Γ acts on phase space functions by<br />

sitewise applying suitable real 2×2 matrices Γx,z,<br />

(Γ ξ)x = <br />

z∈Γx,z · ξz .<br />

For T to be translationally invariant, i.e. invariant under lattice translations 5 τ∆,<br />

where (τ∆ ξ)x = ξx+∆ <strong>with</strong> ∆ ∈, the transformation Γ has to be invariant, too. It<br />

has thus to commute <strong>with</strong> τ∆ for all ξ ∈ Ξ and all x, ∆ ∈:<br />

(Γ τ∆ ξ)x = (τ∆ Γ ξ)x ⇐⇒ Γx,z = Γx−z .<br />

We assume nearest-neighbor coupling for the example, which imposes Γx−z = 0<br />

unless |x − z| ≤ 1. Consequently, Γ is completely determined by three real-valued<br />

5 We denote both the isomorphism of local algebras on different sites, τx Ay = Ay+x, and the<br />

shifting of phase space functions, (τ∆ ξ)x = ξx+∆, by the same symbol τ. This is justified<br />

because both transformations represent the same change of origin of the lattice.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!