08.04.2013 Views

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

Quantum Information Theory with Gaussian Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 <strong>Gaussian</strong> quantum cellular automata<br />

where<br />

R =<br />

k1−ǫ <br />

dk ĉ(k)exp ikx + 2 itα(k) π<br />

+ dk ĉ(k)exp ikx + 2 itα(k) .<br />

−π<br />

kN+ǫ<br />

Integrals of type A cover intervals around the extrema of α(k), integrals B the<br />

intervals in between extrema. The other two integrals in R cover remainders at the<br />

ends of the whole integration interval [−π, π]; they are effectively of type B. If the<br />

derivative of α(k) is nonvanishing, α ′ (k) = 0, we can substitute u = 2α(k) and<br />

k = α −1 (u) to obtain for integrals of type B:<br />

<br />

dk ĉ(k)exp ikx + 2 itα(k) = 2α ′ (k) u<br />

−1<br />

′ n<br />

du ĉ α −1 (u) exp ixα −1 (u) + 2 itu ,<br />

kn+1−ǫ<br />

kn+ǫ<br />

where u n = 2α(k n + ǫ) and u ′ n = 2α(k n+1 − ǫ). Since this integrand is absolutely<br />

integrable, the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma [7, Ch. IX] assures that the integral vanishes<br />

for t → ∞. For integrals A, this substitution is not possible since α ′ (kn) = 0.<br />

However, we can expand α(k) to second order around kn, yielding<br />

kn+ǫ <br />

dk ĉ(k)exp ikx + 2 itα(k) = e 2itα(kn)<br />

kn+ǫ <br />

dk ĉ(k)exp ikx + 2 it(k − kn) 2 α ′′ (kn) .<br />

kn−ǫ<br />

kn−ǫ<br />

Again, the integral vanishes for t → ∞. These arguments would be spoiled by any<br />

ˆΓ(k0) <strong>with</strong> real eigenvalues, which would turn the phase factor e2itα(k) into a realvalued<br />

exponential and thus result in continued squeezing of the respective mode.<br />

Hence we restrict the dynamics to small coupling parameter f.<br />

While the correlation function γ(x) converges, the amplitude part <br />

un<br />

x∈ξ T<br />

x · d of<br />

a translationally invariant state in (4.4) does not unless d = 0: Under time evolution<br />

for t steps, the initial sum is mapped to<br />

<br />

↦−→<br />

x∈ξx <br />

ξ)x =<br />

x∈(Γt ˆ Γt(0) · ˆ ξ(0)<br />

= e itα(0) P0 + e −itα(0) <br />

P0 · ξ(0) ˆ itα(0)<br />

= Re(e P0) · ˆ ξ(0).<br />

This expression clearly depends on t since α(k) = 0 was excluded as the degenerate<br />

case. Hence the convergence of an initial state under the dynamics of the qca is<br />

restricted to states <strong>with</strong> vanishing first moments.<br />

It is remarkable that while the initial state is a pure, uncorrelated state and the<br />

dynamics is reversible for the whole system as well as for every mode, the system<br />

exhibits convergence under interplay of the plane-wave modes. However, we only<br />

consider observables <strong>with</strong> finite support on the chain; hence this behavior suggests<br />

that correlations areradiated to infinityduring time evolution. Since the whole<br />

range of intermediate states is mapped to the same limit state, the system exhibits<br />

the signs of irreversibility we are interested in:<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!