GROUND WATER IN NORTH-CENTRAL TENNESSEE
GROUND WATER IN NORTH-CENTRAL TENNESSEE
GROUND WATER IN NORTH-CENTRAL TENNESSEE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
158 <strong>GROUND</strong> <strong>WATER</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>NORTH</strong>-<strong>CENTRAL</strong> <strong>TENNESSEE</strong><br />
Claxton Branch of Blue Creek, which heads about 2 miles south of Waverly,<br />
is fed by a group of tubular springs that issue from earthy cherty limestone beds,<br />
probably in the Fort Payne formation. The largest of these springs (No. 175,<br />
pp. 161-162) was flowing about 20 gallons a minute on July 19, 1927, whereas the<br />
total flow of this spring-fed creek was about 100 gallons a minute just above its con<br />
fluence with Blue Creek, about 2% miles south of the town. The seasonal varia<br />
tion of these springs is unknown. Although Claxton Branch is probably an<br />
adequate source for the present requirements of the town, it may prove inadequate<br />
for future requirements unless supplemented by the springs on Mathews Branch,<br />
about 2 miles southwest of Waverly. Mathews Branch of Blue Creek rises as<br />
a seepage spring (No. 174), issuing from coarse chert hill wash overlying the Fort<br />
Payne (?) formation. The catchment area tributary to the spring is about 200<br />
acres, most of which is covered with hardwood timber. The discharge of the<br />
spring on July 19, 1927, was about 100 gallons a minute. The orifice was unim<br />
proved, and the seasonal variation in discharge is unknown. Periodic measure<br />
ments of the discharge of both Claxton and Mathews Branches should be made,<br />
in order to determine their seasonal variation, before plans for their utilization<br />
are drawn. To develop these spring-fed streams it would be necessary to install<br />
suitable diversion works, pipe lines, and pumps to raise the water about 200 feet<br />
above the springs to the crest of the ridge south of Waverly. The cost of such<br />
a system would exceed that of a well field in the vicinity of the town, especially<br />
if neither stream were adequate of itself.<br />
Carnell Spring (No. 62) is a tubular spring that issues from the St. Louis lime<br />
stone in the south bank of Little Richland Creek about 2}4 miles north of Waverly.<br />
The discharge from the main orifice on July 19, 1927, was about 1.5 cubic feet a<br />
second (675 gallons a minute, or 975,000 gallons a day); on September 18, when<br />
the ground-water discharge of the region was approximately at the minimum for<br />
the season, the spring discharge was about 1.1 cubic feet a second (500 gallons a<br />
minute, or 700,000 gallons a day). Several smaller openings in a zone extending<br />
200 yards up the creek above the main orifice add considerably to the aggregate<br />
discharge. The discharge from the main orifice alone is probably adequate for<br />
any prospective requirement of the town, although periodic measurements of the<br />
discharge should be made over a term of several years to establish its variability.<br />
It is reported by Wade Work, owner of the spring, that when the creek is at its<br />
highest stage the main orifice is not submerged, although the water issuing from<br />
it is slightly turbid due to suspended matter. If Carnell Spring should be devel<br />
oped for municipal supply, suitable cut-off walls should be put down to bedrock<br />
about the orifice in order to prevent seepage of surface waste into the spring, and<br />
the orifice itself should be thoroughly cleaned and inclosed. A suitable pipe line<br />
and pumps for raising the water about 200 feet above the spring to the crest of<br />
the ridge north of Waverly should also be installed. Carnell Spring is half a mile<br />
farther from Waverly than the springs on Claxton and Mathews Branches of<br />
Blue Creek, but the heads against which water would have to be raised are approx<br />
imately the same for these two potential sources. Hence, the development of<br />
Carnell Spring would be somewhat more costly than that of Claxton Branch or<br />
Mathews Branch alone but would be less costly than the development of both<br />
Claxton and Mathews Branches.<br />
In any region underlain by limestone, such as the vicinity of Waverly, the<br />
ground waters may be polluted permanently or intermittently over extensive<br />
areas. Hence, in order that public health may be properly safeguarded, any<br />
ground water to be used for municipal supply should be sterilized by the appli<br />
cation of chlorine or other adequate sterilizing agent. Chlorination would be<br />
required for each of the possible sources of supply for Waverly.