23.04.2013 Views

GROUND WATER IN NORTH-CENTRAL TENNESSEE

GROUND WATER IN NORTH-CENTRAL TENNESSEE

GROUND WATER IN NORTH-CENTRAL TENNESSEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158 <strong>GROUND</strong> <strong>WATER</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>NORTH</strong>-<strong>CENTRAL</strong> <strong>TENNESSEE</strong><br />

Claxton Branch of Blue Creek, which heads about 2 miles south of Waverly,<br />

is fed by a group of tubular springs that issue from earthy cherty limestone beds,<br />

probably in the Fort Payne formation. The largest of these springs (No. 175,<br />

pp. 161-162) was flowing about 20 gallons a minute on July 19, 1927, whereas the<br />

total flow of this spring-fed creek was about 100 gallons a minute just above its con­<br />

fluence with Blue Creek, about 2% miles south of the town. The seasonal varia­<br />

tion of these springs is unknown. Although Claxton Branch is probably an<br />

adequate source for the present requirements of the town, it may prove inadequate<br />

for future requirements unless supplemented by the springs on Mathews Branch,<br />

about 2 miles southwest of Waverly. Mathews Branch of Blue Creek rises as<br />

a seepage spring (No. 174), issuing from coarse chert hill wash overlying the Fort<br />

Payne (?) formation. The catchment area tributary to the spring is about 200<br />

acres, most of which is covered with hardwood timber. The discharge of the<br />

spring on July 19, 1927, was about 100 gallons a minute. The orifice was unim­<br />

proved, and the seasonal variation in discharge is unknown. Periodic measure­<br />

ments of the discharge of both Claxton and Mathews Branches should be made,<br />

in order to determine their seasonal variation, before plans for their utilization<br />

are drawn. To develop these spring-fed streams it would be necessary to install<br />

suitable diversion works, pipe lines, and pumps to raise the water about 200 feet<br />

above the springs to the crest of the ridge south of Waverly. The cost of such<br />

a system would exceed that of a well field in the vicinity of the town, especially<br />

if neither stream were adequate of itself.<br />

Carnell Spring (No. 62) is a tubular spring that issues from the St. Louis lime­<br />

stone in the south bank of Little Richland Creek about 2}4 miles north of Waverly.<br />

The discharge from the main orifice on July 19, 1927, was about 1.5 cubic feet a<br />

second (675 gallons a minute, or 975,000 gallons a day); on September 18, when<br />

the ground-water discharge of the region was approximately at the minimum for<br />

the season, the spring discharge was about 1.1 cubic feet a second (500 gallons a<br />

minute, or 700,000 gallons a day). Several smaller openings in a zone extending<br />

200 yards up the creek above the main orifice add considerably to the aggregate<br />

discharge. The discharge from the main orifice alone is probably adequate for<br />

any prospective requirement of the town, although periodic measurements of the<br />

discharge should be made over a term of several years to establish its variability.<br />

It is reported by Wade Work, owner of the spring, that when the creek is at its<br />

highest stage the main orifice is not submerged, although the water issuing from<br />

it is slightly turbid due to suspended matter. If Carnell Spring should be devel­<br />

oped for municipal supply, suitable cut-off walls should be put down to bedrock<br />

about the orifice in order to prevent seepage of surface waste into the spring, and<br />

the orifice itself should be thoroughly cleaned and inclosed. A suitable pipe line<br />

and pumps for raising the water about 200 feet above the spring to the crest of<br />

the ridge north of Waverly should also be installed. Carnell Spring is half a mile<br />

farther from Waverly than the springs on Claxton and Mathews Branches of<br />

Blue Creek, but the heads against which water would have to be raised are approx­<br />

imately the same for these two potential sources. Hence, the development of<br />

Carnell Spring would be somewhat more costly than that of Claxton Branch or<br />

Mathews Branch alone but would be less costly than the development of both<br />

Claxton and Mathews Branches.<br />

In any region underlain by limestone, such as the vicinity of Waverly, the<br />

ground waters may be polluted permanently or intermittently over extensive<br />

areas. Hence, in order that public health may be properly safeguarded, any<br />

ground water to be used for municipal supply should be sterilized by the appli­<br />

cation of chlorine or other adequate sterilizing agent. Chlorination would be<br />

required for each of the possible sources of supply for Waverly.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!