Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

* Olofsson, Gunnar. 1988. “After the Working-class Movement? An Essay on What's 'New' and What's 'Social' in the New Social Movements”. Acta Sociologica, 31 (1): 15-34. Olson, Mancur. [1965] 1994. “Public Goods and the Free Rider Problem”. Pp. 162-170 in Collins 1994. * Olzak, Susan and S. C. Noah Uhrig. 2001. “The Ecology of Tactical Overlap”. American Sociological Review, 66, October: 694-717. * Opp, Karl-Dieter and Wolfgang Roehl. 1990. “Repression, Micromobilization, and Political Protest”. Social Forces, 69 (2), December: 521-547. * Oppenheimer, Martin and Evan Stark. 1999. “Sociology”. Critical Sociology, 25 (1): 30-35. * Orenstein, David M. and Paul C. Luken. 1978. “Anarchistic Methodology: Methodological Anti- Authoritarianism as a Resolution to Paradigmatic Disputes in the Social Sciences”. Sociological Focus, 11 (1), January: 53-68. * Owens, Lynn and L. Kendall Palmer. 2003. “Making the News: Anarchist Counter-Public Relations on the World Wide Web”. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20 (4), December: 335-361. * Paris, Jeffrey. 2003. “The Black Bloc's Ungovernable Protest”. Peace Review, 15 (3): 317-322. Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press. * Pellow, David N. 1999. “Framing Emerging Environmental Movement Tactics: Mobilizing Consensus, Demobilizing Conflict”. Sociological Forum, 14 (4): 659-683. * Pepinsky, Harold E. 1978. “Communist Anarchism as an Alternative to the Rule of Criminal Law”. Contemporary Crises, 2 (3), July: 315-327. * Pichardo, Nelson A. 1997. “New Social Movements: A Critical Review”. Annual Review of Sociology, 23 (1): 411-430. * Polletta, Francesca. 1997, “Culture and Its Discontents: Recent Theorizing on the Cultural Dimensions of Protest”. Sociological Inquiry, 67 (4), November: 431-450. * Polletta, Francesca. 2001. “'This is What Democracy Looks Like': A Conversation with Direct Action Network Activists David Graeber, Brooke Lehman, Jose Lugo, and Jeremy Varon”. Social Policy, 31 (4), Summer: 25-30. * Porton, Richard. 1999. “Anarchists on Film: From Mad Bombers to Secular Saints”. Cineaste, 24 (2/3): 10-16. Price, Wayne. 2004. “Class War, Industrial Capitalism, and Civilization”. From ainfos.ca, November 5. Proudhon, Joseph Pierre. ?. “What is Property?”. http://dhm.best.vwh.net/archives/proudhonproperty-is-theft.html * Pruijt, Hans. 2003. “Is the Institutionalization of Urban Movements Inevitable? A Comparison of the Opportunities for Sustained Squatting in New York City and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27 (1), March: 133-157. [ Williams 122 ] [ this is a draft. do not cite. ]
* Przeworski, Adam. 2003. “Freedom to Choose and Democracy”. Economics and Philosophy, 19: 265-279. Puckett, Scott (2002). “What the Fuck Are You Saying?: How the Left has Failed to Communicate its Message to a Mass Audience”. clamor, March/April: 34-35. Purchase, Graham. YEAR?. The Anarchist Revolution. New Anarchy Series, Pamphlet #6. Purchase, Graham. 1997. Anarchism and Ecology. Montréal: Black Rose. * Rathke, Wade. 2001. “Tactical Tension”. Social Policy, Fall: 10-15. * Reichert, William O. 1969. “Anarchism, Freedom, and Power”. Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy, 79 (2), January: 139-149. Revolutionary Anti-authoritarians of Color [RACE] (2003). “Stop War and Empire: Enlist In Your Own Revolution”. Flyer handout. Restivo, Sal. 1993. “Science, Sociology of Science, and the Anarchist Tradition”. Pp. 21-40 in Controversial Science: From Content to Contention, edited by T. Brante, S. Filler, and W. Lynch. Albany: NY: State University of New York Press. Restivo, Sal. 1994. “Science, Society, and Progress”. Pp. 49-69 in Science, Society, and Values: Toward a Sociology of Objectivity. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Press. * Rigby, K. and E. E. Rump. 1982. “Attitudes Toward Authority Authoritarian Personality Characteristics”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 116: 61-72. Ritz, Dean. 2001. Defying Corporations, Defining Democracy: A Book of History & Strategy. New York: Apex Press/POCLAD. * Roberts, Keith A. 1986. “Sociology in the General Education Curriculum: A Cognitive Structuralist Perspective”. Teaching Sociology, 14, October: 207-216. * Robinson, J. Gregg. 1988. “American Unions in Decline: Problems and Prospects”. Critical Sociology, 15 (1), Spring: 33-56. Rock Bloc Collective. 2001. “Stick it to the Manarchy”. Onward, 1 (4). http://www.onwardnewspaper.org/archives/1-2001/manarchy.html Rocker, Rudolph. [1938] 1990. Anarcho-Syndicalism. London: Phoenix Press. Rosebraugh, Craig. 2002. Testimony to Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives. From “Eco-Terrorism and Lawlessness on the National Forests”, Y4.R 31/3: 107-83. U.S. Government Printing Office. February 12: 20-47. Roseland, Mark. 1997. “Dimensions of the Future: An Eco-city Overview”. Pp. 1-12 in Eco-City Dimensions: Healthy Communities, Healthy Planet, edited by M. Roseland. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers. * Rosenthal, Naomi and Michael Schwartz. 1989. “Spontaneity and Democracy in Social Movements”. International Social Movement Research, 2: 33-59. * Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce. 1976. “Conditions Facilitating Participatory-Democratic Organizations”. [ Williams 123 ] [ this is a draft. do not cite. ]
Page 1 and 2:
Sociology of the Anarchists Analysi
Page 3 and 4:
Index of Tables Table 1. Social Mov
Page 5 and 6:
A NOTE ON SCHOLARSHIP Revolutions a
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION We make the world sign
Page 9 and 10:
RESEARCH ISSUES The power to think
Page 11 and 12:
The increased focus upon anarchism
Page 13 and 14:
camps of both the conflict and orde
Page 15 and 16:
See the Models appendix for more on
Page 17 and 18:
type of authority (particularly whe
Page 19 and 20:
with much of this thinking, particu
Page 21 and 22:
International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Page 23 and 24:
a non-coercive consensus can actual
Page 25 and 26:
develop more empathy for them (and
Page 27 and 28:
they could get it for free? Of cour
Page 29 and 30:
CrimethInc 29 , and interacted more
Page 31 and 32:
domestic workers. Of course, anarch
Page 33 and 34:
of the song, however. It is a sort
Page 35 and 36:
VALUES Which side are you on? - Ata
Page 37 and 38:
members are rotated overtime to dis
Page 39 and 40:
ACADEMIA'S ANARCHISTIC “WANNABES
Page 41 and 42:
SOCIAL MOVEMENTS When spiders unite
Page 43 and 44:
Missing, again, is any discussion o
Page 45 and 46:
Chomsky quotes Octave Mirbeau: “a
Page 47 and 48:
information exchange. The Independe
Page 49 and 50:
components of social movements incl
Page 51 and 52:
actions (opposing police brutality,
Page 53 and 54:
Individual anarchists also have qui
Page 55 and 56:
meetings and congregate, as well as
Page 57 and 58:
Labor Movement and New Social Movem
Page 59 and 60:
anarchism”. Western US anarchists
Page 61 and 62:
● Map successive additions of IMC
Page 63 and 64:
A 2002 user survey of the popular w
Page 65 and 66:
organizations. This differs from re
Page 67 and 68:
auspice of the United States govern
Page 69 and 70:
and hierarchical authority structur
Page 71 and 72: hierarchy of positions.” 6. Incen
Page 73 and 74: Anarchist Black Cross Earth First!
Page 75 and 76: Started Minneapolis, MN 1987 Slogan
Page 77 and 78: Critical Mass's only real credo is
Page 79 and 80: actions, cut up thousands of potato
Page 81 and 82: Michigan for example) might skew th
Page 83 and 84: Since many anarchists were engaged
Page 85 and 86: commitment does not conflict with f
Page 87 and 88: each IMCs webpage to “about” pa
Page 89 and 90: A look at the December 1999 archive
Page 91 and 92: Further, the focus upon anarchists
Page 93 and 94: Section Chief of the FBI stated tha
Page 95 and 96: TEACHING Everywhere not only educat
Page 97 and 98: my own attitudes that we should not
Page 99 and 100: The methods elaborated by McKeachie
Page 101 and 102: I'd be happy to do the same for oth
Page 103 and 104: The main points I would like the st
Page 105 and 106: Amster 2002 Carswell 2001 - clamor
Page 107 and 108: * Atkinson, Ian. 2001. “May Day 2
Page 109 and 110: * Boyle, Michael P., Michael R. McC
Page 111 and 112: * Corbridge, Stuart. 2003. “Count
Page 113 and 114: Ehrlich, Howard. 2002. “On the Wa
Page 115 and 116: * Gordon, Linda. 2002. “Social Mo
Page 117 and 118: * Johnson, Ana Gutierrez and Willia
Page 119 and 120: Social Movements, Conflicts and Cha
Page 121: Quarterly, 83 (3), September: 726-7
Page 125 and 126: * Shantz, Jeffrey. 2002. “Judi Ba
Page 127 and 128: * Thies, Clifford F. 2000. “The S
Page 129 and 130: Wood, Lesley J. 2004. “Bridging t
Page 131 and 132: APPENDIX: GLOSSARY What does anarch
Page 133 and 134: Sexuality: thought, identity, and a
Page 135 and 136: Compatibility model: anarchism inte
Page 137 and 138: Socialist model: anarchism has trad
Page 139: Index will be too huge and unwieldy
show all

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?