27.04.2013 Views

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL MOVEMENTS<br />

When spiders unite,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y can tie down a lion.<br />

- African proverb<br />

A core component <strong>of</strong> sociology is how and why people work toge<strong>the</strong>r in groups and<br />

organizations, specifically within social movements. If collective behavior is viewed as<br />

<strong>the</strong> random and unintentional result <strong>of</strong> people interacting toge<strong>the</strong>r, social movements are<br />

<strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> deliberate and intentional interactions. Even though anarchism has long been<br />

identified as a movement (although to some a dead one), it is rarely written about as such.<br />

Jeff Shantz (2003) writes:<br />

Conventional analyses <strong>of</strong> social movements continue to<br />

overlook <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> unconventional manifestations<br />

<strong>of</strong> resistance... Analyses have been constrained by a ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

myopic preoccupation ei<strong>the</strong>r with organizational structures<br />

and resources which allow for access to <strong>the</strong> state or with<br />

civil actions (including civil disobedience) by which<br />

activists might register dissent or popularize claims... Left<br />

out <strong>of</strong> conventional <strong>the</strong>orizing are movements which want<br />

no part <strong>of</strong> world order, new or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, which <strong>the</strong>y view<br />

as authoritarian, hierarchical, and inevitably genocidal (or<br />

“eco-cidal”). (p. 90)<br />

Anarchism has been given a decent treatment in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> history. But, to leave<br />

anarchism within <strong>the</strong> academy's History Departments misleads one to think that<br />

anarchism is merely a historical relic. In doing so, <strong>the</strong> vast leaps in <strong>the</strong>ory and practice<br />

that have been made by successive waves <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> anarchist movement are overlooked.<br />

I think <strong>the</strong> most appropriate and useful (although perhaps not as entertaining) way in<br />

which to study anarchism is via sociology's sub-discipline <strong>of</strong> “social movement” <strong>the</strong>ory.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more well-known texts on social movements have commented on anarchism.<br />

Critiques <strong>of</strong> Social Movement <strong>The</strong>orists<br />

[List texts here. <strong>The</strong>n respond to <strong>the</strong>ir handling <strong>of</strong> anarchism.]<br />

“Frontiers in Social Movement <strong>The</strong>ory”, ed. By Aldon D. Morris & Carol McClurg<br />

Mueller. No index mention.<br />

“Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics”, Sidney Tarrow. Five<br />

total pages <strong>of</strong> reference in index. Tarrow closes one small section “<strong>The</strong> Anarchist<br />

[ Williams 41 ] [ this is a draft. do not cite. ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!