27.04.2013 Views

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

Sociology of the Anarchists - Gozips.uakron.edu - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VALUES<br />

Which side are you on?<br />

- Atari Teenage Riot<br />

What does sociology say about anarchist values? Sociologists have said quite a bit more<br />

about anarchist values than anarchism itself. This shows how sociology <strong>of</strong>ten considers<br />

<strong>the</strong> concepts <strong>of</strong> anarchism without referring to anarchism directly. This is likely due to <strong>the</strong><br />

perception that sociology should be concerned with understanding society, not changing<br />

society. <strong>The</strong> inability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>edu</strong>cated sociologists to see that analysis creates a mandate<br />

for action, illustrates <strong>the</strong> morally vacuousness <strong>of</strong> sectors within <strong>the</strong> discipline.<br />

Below are a number <strong>of</strong> key anarchist values (as noted in <strong>the</strong> Appendix): antiauthoritarianism,<br />

direct action, liberty, mutual aid, self-determination, solidarity, and<br />

voluntary association. Each value is discussed, in turn, via its general sociological<br />

understanding.<br />

Anti-authoritarianism (hierarchy-less, egalitarianism)<br />

authority: Haskell, T. (1984); Weber, M. (1946); Willner, A.R. (1984)<br />

hierarchy: Becker, H.S. (1967); Schryer 2001; Blaug (2000)<br />

Authority: If authority is <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> coercion and if <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> authority mean<br />

that subordinate people accept that authority, what does that imply for antiauthoritarians?<br />

Clearly, anti-authoritarians do not accept <strong>the</strong> willing self-subjugation to<br />

authority figures, and <strong>the</strong>refore leave <strong>the</strong>mselves open to o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong> coercion.<br />

If oppressive power can be embodied in both authority and coercion, anarchists reject<br />

both means <strong>of</strong> oppression, claiming nei<strong>the</strong>r are legitimate, since <strong>the</strong>re is no such thing as<br />

legitimate authority.<br />

Please see <strong>the</strong> section entitled Social Movements for an application <strong>of</strong> Weber's three<br />

types <strong>of</strong> authority applied to <strong>the</strong> anarchist movement.<br />

Direct action (civil-disobedience)<br />

direct action: Polletta (2001)<br />

Liberty (freedom, autonomy)<br />

autonomy: Kohn, M.L. & Slomczynski, K.M. (1990); Bates (1972); Katsiaficas (2001)<br />

Mutual aid (cooperation) (mutualism?)<br />

mutual aid: Glassman (2000); Kinna (1995); Dugger (1984)<br />

Kinna (1995) argues that Kropotkin's mutual aid <strong>the</strong>ory was in some ways a political<br />

[ Williams 35 ] [ this is a draft. do not cite. ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!