30.04.2013 Views

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When a fertilised ovum undergoes sister<br />

chromatid exchange as part of conventional<br />

breeding, the chromosome rearrangements do not<br />

take place in a r<strong>and</strong>om <strong>and</strong> haphazard way, but<br />

are precisely guided so that no information is lost.<br />

There can be defects in the process, which could<br />

lead to mutations. But the process works against<br />

defects occurring by employing precise cellular<br />

mechanisms that have evolved over hundreds<br />

of thous<strong>and</strong>s of years to preserve the order <strong>and</strong><br />

information content of the genome of the species.<br />

Genetic engineering, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is<br />

an artificial laboratory procedure that forcibly<br />

introduces foreign DNA into the cells of a plant.<br />

Once the engineered transgene is in the nucleus of<br />

the cells, it breaks r<strong>and</strong>omly into the DNA of the<br />

plant <strong>and</strong> inserts into that site. Furthermore, GM<br />

plants do not contain only a few mutations. The<br />

GM transformation process produces hundreds<br />

or thous<strong>and</strong>s of mutations throughout the plant’s<br />

DNA.<br />

For these reasons, conventional breeding is far<br />

more precise <strong>and</strong> carries fewer mutation-related<br />

risks than genetic engineering.<br />

“We will select out harmful mutations”<br />

GM proponents say that even if harmful<br />

mutations occur, that is not a problem. They say<br />

that during the genetic engineering process, the<br />

GM plants undergo many levels of screening <strong>and</strong><br />

selection, <strong>and</strong> the genetic engineers will catch any<br />

plants that have harmful mutations <strong>and</strong> eliminate<br />

them during this process.<br />

As explained above, the process of gene<br />

insertion during the process of genetic<br />

modification selects for engineered GM gene<br />

insertion into active gene regions of the host<br />

(recipient) plant cell. This means that the process<br />

has a high inherent potential to disrupt the<br />

function of active genes present in the plant’s<br />

DNA.<br />

In many cases, the disruption will be fatal<br />

– the engineered cell will die <strong>and</strong> will not grow<br />

into a GM plant. In other cases, the plant will<br />

compensate for the lost function in some way, or<br />

the insertion will occur at a location that seems<br />

to cause minimal disruption of the plant cell’s<br />

functioning. This is what is desired. But just<br />

because a plant grows vigorously does not mean<br />

that it is safe to eat <strong>and</strong> safe for the environment.<br />

It could have a mutation that causes it to produce<br />

substances that harm consumers or to damage the<br />

ecosystem.<br />

Genetic engineers do not carry out detailed<br />

screening that would catch all potentially harmful<br />

plants. They introduce the GM gene(s) into<br />

hundreds or thous<strong>and</strong>s of plant cells <strong>and</strong> grow<br />

them out into individual GM plants. If the gene<br />

insertion process has damaged the function of<br />

one or more plant cell genes that are essential for<br />

survival, the cell will not survive this process. So<br />

plants carrying such “lethal” mutations will be<br />

eliminated. But the genetic engineer is often left<br />

with several thous<strong>and</strong> individual GM plants, each<br />

of them different, because:<br />

● The engineered genes have been inserted in<br />

different locations within the DNA of each<br />

plant<br />

● Other mutations or disturbances in host gene<br />

function have occurred at other locations in<br />

the plants through the mechanisms described<br />

above (1.3.4).<br />

How do genetic engineers sort through the<br />

GM plants to identify the one or two that they<br />

are going to commercialise? The main thing<br />

that they do is to verify that the trait that the<br />

engineered transgene is supposed to confer has<br />

been expressed in the plant. That is, they do a test<br />

that allows them to find the few plants among the<br />

many thous<strong>and</strong>s that express the desired trait. Of<br />

those, they pick one that looks healthy, strong,<br />

<strong>and</strong> capable of being bred on <strong>and</strong> propagated.<br />

That is all they do. Such screening cannot detect<br />

plants that have undergone mutations that cause<br />

them to produce substances that are harmful to<br />

consumers or lacking in important nutrients.<br />

It is unrealistic for GM proponents to claim<br />

that they can detect all hazards based on<br />

differences in the crop’s appearance, vigour, or<br />

yield. Some mutations will give rise to changes<br />

that the breeder will see in the greenhouse or field,<br />

but others give rise to changes that are not visible<br />

because they occur at a subtle biochemical level<br />

or only under certain circumstances. So only a<br />

small proportion of potentially harmful mutations<br />

will be eliminated by the breeder’s superficial<br />

<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!