30.04.2013 Views

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

een found to be unreliable <strong>and</strong> incomplete:<br />

● A study on GM brassicas, potato <strong>and</strong> blackberry<br />

found that the use of three antibiotics<br />

failed to completely remove A. tumefaciens.<br />

Instead, the A. tumefaciens contamination<br />

levels increased from 12 to 16 weeks after<br />

the GM transformation process <strong>and</strong> the A.<br />

tumefaciens was still detected 6 months after<br />

transformation. 180<br />

● A study on GM conifers found that residual A.<br />

tumefaciens remained in the trees 12 months<br />

after the genetic transformation but were not<br />

detected after this time in the same plants. 181<br />

However, these experiments only examined the<br />

first GM plant clones. In the GM development<br />

process, such GM clones go through a long process<br />

of back-crossing <strong>and</strong> propagation with the bestperforming<br />

non-GM or GM plant relatives in order<br />

to try to produce a GM plant that performs well<br />

in the field <strong>and</strong> expresses the desired traits. The<br />

important question is whether A. tumefaciens<br />

carrying GM genes survives this back-crossing <strong>and</strong><br />

propagation process <strong>and</strong> remains in the final GM<br />

plant that is commercialised.<br />

To the best of our knowledge there have been<br />

no studies to assess whether any A. tumefaciens<br />

remains in the final commercialised GM plant.<br />

The study on GM conifers examined the initial<br />

GM clones that were grown on, not plants that<br />

had been cross-bred <strong>and</strong> propagated over several<br />

generations, as GM crops are before they are<br />

commercialised, so it does not provide an answer<br />

to this question.<br />

However, this question should be answered<br />

before a GM variety is commercialised, in order<br />

to avoid unwanted consequences that could be<br />

caused by residual A. tumefaciens in the final GM<br />

plant. Examples of consequences that should be<br />

excluded are the transfer of insecticidal properties<br />

to bacteria, or of herbicide tolerance to other<br />

crops or wild plants. The study discussed above<br />

(5.12.3) shows that the introduction of GM genes<br />

into crop plants could have consequences to<br />

organisms outside the plant kingdom, through<br />

the mechanism of infection by fungi carrying A.<br />

tumefaciens, which in turn carry GM genes. 177<br />

The consequences of such HGT for human<br />

<strong>and</strong> animal health <strong>and</strong> the environment are not<br />

predictable, but are potentially serious. The health<br />

<strong>and</strong> environmental risk assessment for any GM<br />

variety must demonstrate that the GM plants have<br />

been completely cleared of GM A. tumefaciens<br />

before they are approved for commercialisation.<br />

5.12.4. Gene transfer by viruses<br />

Viruses are efficient at transferring genes from<br />

one organism to another <strong>and</strong> in effect are able to<br />

carry out HGT. Scientists have made use of this<br />

capacity to create viral gene transfer vectors that<br />

are frequently used in research to introduce GM<br />

genes into other organisms. Such vectors based on<br />

plant viruses have also been developed to generate<br />

GM crops, though no crops produced with this<br />

approach have been commercialised to date. 182 183<br />

The viral vectors that are used to generate GM<br />

crops are designed to prevent the uncontrolled<br />

transfer of genetic material. However, because the<br />

long time period during which virally engineered<br />

crops would be propagated in the environment,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the large number of humans <strong>and</strong> livestock<br />

that would be exposed to this GM genetic material,<br />

there is a real, though small, risk that unintended<br />

modifications could occur that could lead to virusmediated<br />

HGT – with unpredictable effects.<br />

Another potential risk of virus-mediated<br />

HGT comes from GM crops engineered to<br />

contain a virus gene, in particular those carrying<br />

information for a viral “coat” protein. This is done<br />

in an attempt to confer resistance of the crop from<br />

actual infection <strong>and</strong> damage by the family of ‘wild’<br />

virus from which the viral GM gene was derived.<br />

However, it has been suggested that if a GM crop<br />

containing a viral gene of this type was infected<br />

by the viruses, it may result in exchange of genetic<br />

material between the GM viral gene in the plant<br />

<strong>and</strong> the infecting virus, through a process known<br />

as recombination. This can potentially result in a<br />

new more potent (“virulent”) strain of virus. 184,185<br />

The reasons for these concerns are as follows.<br />

The GM viral gene will be present in every single<br />

cell of the crop. As a result, the large-scale<br />

cultivation of such a viral GM gene-containing<br />

crop will result in an extremely high concentration<br />

of particular viral genes in fields. It has been<br />

suggested that this provides an unprecedented<br />

opportunity for genetic material recombination<br />

<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!