30.04.2013 Views

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

events to take place between an infecting virus<br />

<strong>and</strong> GM viral genes in the crop, thereby increasing<br />

the risk of new, mutated, <strong>and</strong> potentially more<br />

virulent strains of virus being produced. 185<br />

Such viral mutation with increased virulence<br />

has been shown to occur under laboratory<br />

conditions. 186,187<br />

To date only two GM crops engineered with<br />

genes from viruses have been commercialised: a<br />

variety of squash grown in the USA <strong>and</strong> Mexico, 188<br />

189 <strong>and</strong> papaya cultivated in Hawaii. 190 There are<br />

no reports of any investigations to see if any new<br />

viral strains have arisen by recombination in these<br />

two crops. Interestingly, <strong>and</strong> quite unexpectedly,<br />

although the GM squash was resistant to viral<br />

infection, it was found to be prone to bacterial wilt<br />

disease following attack by beetles. 191<br />

Conclusion to Section 5<br />

Most of the benefits for farmers <strong>and</strong> the<br />

environment claimed for GM crops are either<br />

exaggerated or false. For example, contrary to<br />

frequent claims, GM crops have not increased<br />

intrinsic yield. Crop yields have increased over<br />

the past decades, but this is due to successes in<br />

conventional breeding, not GM traits.<br />

Neither have GM crops decreased pesticide<br />

use. The adoption of GM Bt maize <strong>and</strong> cotton<br />

has resulted in a slight decrease in the volume of<br />

insecticide sprays, but this decrease is likely to<br />

be unsustainable as pests gain resistance to the<br />

Bt toxins <strong>and</strong> secondary pests take over. Also,<br />

the reduction in insecticidal sprays is dwarfed by<br />

the massive increase in herbicide use caused by<br />

the adoption of GM herbicide-tolerant crops. The<br />

adoption of these GM crops has caused farmers to<br />

spray 383 million more pounds (174 million kg)<br />

of herbicides than they would have done in the<br />

absence of GM herbicide-tolerant seeds.<br />

This increase is largely due to the spread of<br />

weeds resistant to glyphosate, the herbicide most<br />

commonly used on GM crops. As a “solution” to<br />

the problem of glyphosate-resistant weeds, biotech<br />

companies have developed crops engineered to<br />

tolerate several different herbicides, including<br />

5.12.5. Overall assessment of the risks<br />

of HGT by the above methods<br />

HGT events of all types are of very low probability of<br />

occurrence. The method with the highest probability<br />

of occurring is DNA uptake by bacteria in either<br />

the environment or the digestive tract. There is<br />

good evidence that this has already happened in the<br />

intestinal bacteria of humans who consume GM soy.<br />

The other scenarios are of significantly lower<br />

probability. However, given the extremely wide<br />

distribution of GM crops <strong>and</strong> their intended use<br />

over decades, these low probabilities translate<br />

into the likelihood that HGT events could actually<br />

occur even via the mechanisms that are expected<br />

to take place at lower probabilities.<br />

Therefore, the negative impacts <strong>and</strong> risks<br />

associated with HGT must be taken into account in<br />

considering the overall biosafety of any GM crop.<br />

potentially even more toxic herbicides such as<br />

dicamba <strong>and</strong> 2,4-D (an extremely toxic ingredient<br />

of Agent Orange). The resulting chemical treadmill<br />

only benefits the GM seed companies, which profit<br />

from each failure of their technologies because the<br />

failure creates a new opportunity for them to sell<br />

more chemicals in increasingly complex mixtures.<br />

Claims for the environmental friendliness of<br />

the no-till farming system as practised with GM<br />

herbicide-tolerant crops are also unjustified.<br />

Glyphosate over-use is also causing other<br />

problems for farmers, such as reducing crop<br />

vigour by making soil nutrients unavailable to<br />

crops <strong>and</strong> causing or exacerbating plant diseases<br />

that impact yield. Manufacturer claims that<br />

glyphosate/Roundup is an environmentally<br />

benign herbicide with low toxicity have proved<br />

to be false, with a growing number of studies<br />

showing that it persists in the environment <strong>and</strong><br />

has toxic effects, in addition to studies showing<br />

that it is toxic to humans <strong>and</strong> causes birth defects<br />

<strong>and</strong> cancer.<br />

Claims of reductions in insecticide use through<br />

Bt crops are suspect when it is considered that<br />

the entire GM plant is an insecticide. Also, Bt<br />

crop technology is being undermined by the<br />

<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!