GMO Myths and Truths
GMO Myths and Truths
GMO Myths and Truths
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
events to take place between an infecting virus<br />
<strong>and</strong> GM viral genes in the crop, thereby increasing<br />
the risk of new, mutated, <strong>and</strong> potentially more<br />
virulent strains of virus being produced. 185<br />
Such viral mutation with increased virulence<br />
has been shown to occur under laboratory<br />
conditions. 186,187<br />
To date only two GM crops engineered with<br />
genes from viruses have been commercialised: a<br />
variety of squash grown in the USA <strong>and</strong> Mexico, 188<br />
189 <strong>and</strong> papaya cultivated in Hawaii. 190 There are<br />
no reports of any investigations to see if any new<br />
viral strains have arisen by recombination in these<br />
two crops. Interestingly, <strong>and</strong> quite unexpectedly,<br />
although the GM squash was resistant to viral<br />
infection, it was found to be prone to bacterial wilt<br />
disease following attack by beetles. 191<br />
Conclusion to Section 5<br />
Most of the benefits for farmers <strong>and</strong> the<br />
environment claimed for GM crops are either<br />
exaggerated or false. For example, contrary to<br />
frequent claims, GM crops have not increased<br />
intrinsic yield. Crop yields have increased over<br />
the past decades, but this is due to successes in<br />
conventional breeding, not GM traits.<br />
Neither have GM crops decreased pesticide<br />
use. The adoption of GM Bt maize <strong>and</strong> cotton<br />
has resulted in a slight decrease in the volume of<br />
insecticide sprays, but this decrease is likely to<br />
be unsustainable as pests gain resistance to the<br />
Bt toxins <strong>and</strong> secondary pests take over. Also,<br />
the reduction in insecticidal sprays is dwarfed by<br />
the massive increase in herbicide use caused by<br />
the adoption of GM herbicide-tolerant crops. The<br />
adoption of these GM crops has caused farmers to<br />
spray 383 million more pounds (174 million kg)<br />
of herbicides than they would have done in the<br />
absence of GM herbicide-tolerant seeds.<br />
This increase is largely due to the spread of<br />
weeds resistant to glyphosate, the herbicide most<br />
commonly used on GM crops. As a “solution” to<br />
the problem of glyphosate-resistant weeds, biotech<br />
companies have developed crops engineered to<br />
tolerate several different herbicides, including<br />
5.12.5. Overall assessment of the risks<br />
of HGT by the above methods<br />
HGT events of all types are of very low probability of<br />
occurrence. The method with the highest probability<br />
of occurring is DNA uptake by bacteria in either<br />
the environment or the digestive tract. There is<br />
good evidence that this has already happened in the<br />
intestinal bacteria of humans who consume GM soy.<br />
The other scenarios are of significantly lower<br />
probability. However, given the extremely wide<br />
distribution of GM crops <strong>and</strong> their intended use<br />
over decades, these low probabilities translate<br />
into the likelihood that HGT events could actually<br />
occur even via the mechanisms that are expected<br />
to take place at lower probabilities.<br />
Therefore, the negative impacts <strong>and</strong> risks<br />
associated with HGT must be taken into account in<br />
considering the overall biosafety of any GM crop.<br />
potentially even more toxic herbicides such as<br />
dicamba <strong>and</strong> 2,4-D (an extremely toxic ingredient<br />
of Agent Orange). The resulting chemical treadmill<br />
only benefits the GM seed companies, which profit<br />
from each failure of their technologies because the<br />
failure creates a new opportunity for them to sell<br />
more chemicals in increasingly complex mixtures.<br />
Claims for the environmental friendliness of<br />
the no-till farming system as practised with GM<br />
herbicide-tolerant crops are also unjustified.<br />
Glyphosate over-use is also causing other<br />
problems for farmers, such as reducing crop<br />
vigour by making soil nutrients unavailable to<br />
crops <strong>and</strong> causing or exacerbating plant diseases<br />
that impact yield. Manufacturer claims that<br />
glyphosate/Roundup is an environmentally<br />
benign herbicide with low toxicity have proved<br />
to be false, with a growing number of studies<br />
showing that it persists in the environment <strong>and</strong><br />
has toxic effects, in addition to studies showing<br />
that it is toxic to humans <strong>and</strong> causes birth defects<br />
<strong>and</strong> cancer.<br />
Claims of reductions in insecticide use through<br />
Bt crops are suspect when it is considered that<br />
the entire GM plant is an insecticide. Also, Bt<br />
crop technology is being undermined by the<br />
<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 94