GMO Myths and Truths
GMO Myths and Truths
GMO Myths and Truths
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.2.4. Conclusion<br />
GM herbicide-tolerant crops have led to massive<br />
increases in herbicide use <strong>and</strong> a resulting spread<br />
of herbicide-resistant weeds. Farmers have to<br />
resort to spraying more herbicide, or mixtures<br />
of herbicides, to try to control weeds. This<br />
“chemical treadmill” model of farming is especially<br />
impractical for farmers in the Global South, who<br />
cannot afford to buy more or different herbicides<br />
in an effort to control resistant weeds.<br />
5.3 Myth: No-till farming with GM crops is environmentally friendly<br />
Truth: Claims of environmental benefits from GM no-till<br />
farming are unsound<br />
GM proponents claim that GM herbicidetolerant<br />
crops, especially GM Roundup Ready<br />
(RR) soy, are environmentally friendly because<br />
they allow farmers to adopt the no-till system<br />
of cultivation. No-till farming avoids ploughing<br />
in order to conserve soil <strong>and</strong> water, <strong>and</strong><br />
supposedly to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.<br />
In no-till cultivation of GM Roundup Ready<br />
soy, weeds are controlled through herbicide<br />
applications rather than mechanically, through<br />
ploughing.<br />
There are at least two problems with this<br />
argument:<br />
● No-till or low-till farming can be – <strong>and</strong><br />
is – practised in chemically-based <strong>and</strong><br />
agroecological farming. Farmers do not<br />
have to adopt GM crops or use herbicides to<br />
practise no-till.<br />
● Claims of environmental benefits for GM<br />
crops with no-till cultivation have been shown<br />
to be misleading. One study compared the<br />
environmental impacts of growing GM RR<br />
<strong>and</strong> non-GM soy, using an indicator called<br />
Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ). EIQ<br />
assesses the negative environmental impacts<br />
of the use of pesticides <strong>and</strong> herbicides on<br />
farm workers, consumers <strong>and</strong> ecology (fish,<br />
birds, bees <strong>and</strong> other beneficial insects). The<br />
study found that in Argentina, the negative<br />
environmental impact of GM soy was higher<br />
than that of non-GM soy in both no-till <strong>and</strong><br />
tillage systems because of the herbicides used.<br />
Also, the adoption of no-till raised the EIQ,<br />
whether the soy was GM RR or non-GM. The<br />
main reason for the increase in herbicides used<br />
in no-till systems was the spread of glyphosateresistant<br />
superweeds. 40<br />
We conclude that claims of environmental<br />
benefits from no-till farming with GM crops are<br />
unjustified.<br />
Herbicide-tolerant crops undermine sustainable agriculture<br />
“Agricultural weed management has become entrenched in a single tactic – herbicide-resistant crops – <strong>and</strong><br />
needs greater emphasis on integrated practices that are sustainable over the long term. In response to the<br />
outbreak of glyphosate-resistant weeds, the seed <strong>and</strong> agrichemical industries are developing crops that<br />
are genetically modified to have combined resistance to glyphosate <strong>and</strong> synthetic auxin herbicides. This<br />
technology will allow these herbicides to be used over vastly exp<strong>and</strong>ed areas <strong>and</strong> will likely create three<br />
interrelated challenges for sustainable weed management. First, crops with stacked herbicide resistance<br />
are likely to increase the severity of resistant weeds. Second, these crops will facilitate a significant<br />
increase in herbicide use, with potential negative consequences for environmental quality. Finally, the<br />
short-term fix provided by the new traits will encourage continued neglect of public research <strong>and</strong> extension<br />
in integrated weed management.”<br />
– Mortensen DA, et al. Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience<br />
2012; 62: 75-84 33<br />
<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 76