30.04.2013 Views

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

GMO Myths and Truths

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

acterium, thereby creating a “superbug”.<br />

The transfer of GM genes from food to<br />

intestinal bacteria has been documented in a<br />

study on humans, which found that the intestinal<br />

bacteria of a person whose diet included soy<br />

carried sequences unique to the GM soy that was<br />

part of their diet. 165<br />

The second scenario in which DNA uptake by<br />

bacteria could result in HGT of GM genes is the<br />

transfer of GM DNA to soil bacteria. Cultivation<br />

of transgenic crops leads to the degradation of<br />

GM plant material in the environment, liberating<br />

GM genes into the soil. Every cubic centimetre<br />

of soil contains thous<strong>and</strong>s of different species<br />

of bacteria, only a small percentage of which<br />

have been identified <strong>and</strong> characterised. Some<br />

of the known soil bacteria can, <strong>and</strong> do, take<br />

up free DNA that may be present in the soil,<br />

incorporating that DNA into their genomes. 166<br />

This could result in the transfer of GM genes<br />

to natural soil bacterial populations. Based on<br />

limited currently available data, this type of<br />

event has been calculated to be extremely rare. 167<br />

However, it has been shown that GM DNA can<br />

persist in soil at detectable levels for at least a<br />

year, 168 increasing the likelihood of HGT.<br />

In addition, we only know a small fraction of<br />

the soil bacteria that could potentially take up<br />

DNA from their environment. 166 Furthermore,<br />

if the uptake of a GM gene, for example for<br />

antibiotic resistance, gives the bacterium a<br />

survival <strong>and</strong> growth advantage, this can allow<br />

them to outcompete other bacterial strains in the<br />

presence of widely used antibiotics in agriculture<br />

<strong>and</strong> medicine. Therefore, this initial rare event<br />

could still result in a significant environmental<br />

<strong>and</strong> health outcome. 169<br />

5.12.2. DNA uptake during digestion<br />

of GM foods<br />

A study on mice demonstrated that foreign DNA<br />

present in food can be transferred from the<br />

digestive tract to the bloodstream of animals that<br />

eat the food. This foreign DNA was also found in<br />

white blood cells <strong>and</strong> in the cells of many other<br />

tissues of the mice. 170 In a separate study, foreign<br />

DNA in a diet fed to pregnant mice was found<br />

in the organs of their foetuses <strong>and</strong> newborn<br />

offspring. The foreign DNA was believed to have<br />

reached the foetus through the placenta. 171<br />

It has also been shown that GM DNA in feed<br />

can be taken up in the organs of the animals that<br />

eat it <strong>and</strong> can be detected in the meat <strong>and</strong> fish that<br />

people eat. 172,173,174,175<br />

Most of the GM DNA in food is fragmented<br />

before it reaches the blood or tissues. However, a<br />

few copies of GM DNA large enough to contain the<br />

sequence of a full <strong>and</strong> functional gene will also be<br />

present in the digestive tract <strong>and</strong> can be taken up<br />

into the blood at lower frequency, where it can be<br />

transported by the blood <strong>and</strong> taken up by cells of<br />

some tissues or organs. 170 Once taken up by a cell,<br />

such a GM gene could be integrated into the DNA<br />

of the cell, causing either direct mutation of a host<br />

gene function or reprogramming the host cell to<br />

produce the protein for which that GM gene codes,<br />

or both.<br />

At present, this scenario is speculative.<br />

Although it is clearly possible to detect transgenic<br />

DNA in the tissues of organisms that consume<br />

GM feed, no research has been published that<br />

shows that the GM DNA is expressed in the<br />

tissues of those organisms. It would be expected<br />

that if such expression did occur, it would not<br />

occur frequently. In order to find out whether<br />

such expression events actually occur, it would<br />

be necessary to conduct very large-scale studies –<br />

though identifying a suitable experimental design<br />

would be challenging.<br />

It should be pointed out, however, that<br />

although such events may be of low frequency,<br />

because of the widespread consumption of <strong>GMO</strong>s<br />

by both humans <strong>and</strong> animals, the fact that such<br />

events are of low frequency does not eliminate<br />

them as important to the biosafety assessment of<br />

<strong>GMO</strong>s.<br />

Though the mechanism is still unclear, GM feed<br />

has been found to affect the health of animals<br />

that eat it. GM DNA from soy was detected in<br />

the blood, organs, <strong>and</strong> milk of goats. An enzyme,<br />

lactic dehydrogenase, was found at significantly<br />

raised levels in the heart, muscle, <strong>and</strong> kidneys of<br />

young goats fed GM soy. 176 This enzyme leaks from<br />

damaged cells during immune reactions or injury,<br />

so high levels may indicate such problems.<br />

<strong>GMO</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truths</strong> 91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!