NON-CHEMICAL APPROACHES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ...

Table 13. Effect of spraying botanicals at different intervals on oviposition of shoot fly on 21 DAE in late sown sorghum
Spraying interval (DAE)
Treatments 3 6 9 12 3, 6 3, 6,
9
Azagro 5% 2.00 b
(1.73)*
NSKE 5% 2.00 b
Plant mixture
5%
Endosulfan
35 EC
(0.07%)
(1.73)
2.00 b
(1.73)
1.66 c
(1.63)
Mean 1.92 b
(1.71)
2.00 b
(1.73)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.59 c
(1.61)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.33 d
(1.53)
2.00 b
(1.73)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.59 c
(1.61)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.34 d
(1.53)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.34 d
(1.53)
1.00 e
(1.41)
0.33 g
(1.15)
1.33 d
(1.53)
0.33 g
(1.15)
0.74 f
(1.32)
3,6,9,12 3, 9 3, 12 6, 9 6, 9,
12
Number of shoot fly eggs per plant
0.66 f
(1.15)
0.33 g
(1.15)
1.33 d
(1.53)
0.33 g
(1.15)
0.59 g
(1.26)
* Figures in parentheses indicates √ x + 1 transformed values.
Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.05) by DMRT.
DAE – Days After Emergence
SEm± CD at 5% Source
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.09
Between two treatments
Between two spraying intervals
Interaction between treatments and spraying intervals
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.16 e
(1.47)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.33 d
(1.53)
1.33 d
(1.53)
0.66 f
(1.29)
1.16 e
(1.47)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.66 c
(1.63)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.16 e
(1.47)
0.66 f
(1.29)
0.33 g
(1.15)
1.33 d
(1.53)
0.33 g
(1.15)
0.66 f
(1.29)
6, 12 9, 12 Untreated
control
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.33 d
(1.53)
0.66 f
(1.29)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.00 e
(1.41)
1.33 d
(1.53)
0.66 f
(1.29)
1.00 e
(1.41)
2.66 a
(1.91)
2.33 a
(1.83)
2.66 a
(1.83)
2.33 a
(1.91)
2.49 a
(1.87)
Mean
1.31 b
(1.52)
1.13c
(1.46)
1.62a
(1.62)
1.02d
(1.42)
1.27
(1.51)