NON-CHEMICAL APPROACHES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ...

Table 15. Evaluation of spraying botanicals at different intervals on the deadheart formation by shoot fly on 21 DAE in timely sown sorghum
Treatments 3 6 9 12 3, 6 3, 6, 9
Azagro 5% 20.33 b
(25.82)*
NSKE 5% 19.00 b
Plant
mixture 5%
Endosulfan
35 EC
(0.07%)
(24.96)
19.66 b
(25.46)
13.00 b
(24.96)
Mean 18.00 b
(25.29)
15.00 de
(22.17)
14.66 e
(21.93)
16.33 cd
(23.14)
12.00 e
(21.93)
14.45 c
(22.29)
15.00 de
(22.18)
15.00 de
(22.18)
16.66 c
(23.36)
12.66 de
(22.18)
14.83 c
(22.48)
19.00 b
(24.96)
19.66 b
(25.40)
20.00 b
(25.6)
13.66 b
(25.40)
18.08 b
(25.34)
12.00 fgh
(19.83)
10.00 i-l
(18.10)
12.00 fgh
(19.83)
9.33 i-l
(18.10)
18.83 d
(18.96)
SEm± CD at 5% Source
0.04
0.19
0.22
0.14
0.52
1.01
7.00 mn
(15.13)
5.33 p
(13.21)
7.00 mn
(5.13)
5.00 p
(13.21)
6.08 f
(14.17)
Spraying interval (DAE)
3, 6,
9,12 3, 9 3, 12 6, 9
5.33 p
(13.21)
4.0 q
(11.45)
6.33 mno
(14.4)
4.00 q
(11.45)
4.91 g
(12.63)
Deadhearts (%)
12.33 fg
(20.09)
10.33 i-l
(18.41)
12.66 f
(20.38)
10.00 i-l
(18.41)
11.33 d
(19.32)
10.00 i-l
(18.11)
9.00 l
(17.16)
9.66 jkl
(17.80)
6.33 l
(17.16)
8.75 e
(17.56)
11.33 f-i
(19.25)
11.00 g-j
(19.00)
12.00 fgh
(19.83)
9.66 g-j
(19.00)
11.00 d
(19.27)
6, 9,
12
6.0 nop
(14.03)
5.66 op
(13.62)
7.33 m
(15.48)
5.00 op
(13.62)
6.00 f
(14.19)
* Figures in parentheses are arc sine transformed values
Means followed by same alphabet do not differ significantly (0.05) by DMRT
DAE – Days After Emergence
B/W two treatment
B/W two spraying intervals
Interaction of treatments and spraying intervals
6, 12 9, 12 Untreated
control
9.33 kl
(17.49)
9.33 kl
(17.49)
10.33 i-l
(18.41)
7.66 k-l
(17.49)
9.16 e
(17.72)
9.00 l
(17.18)
9.66 jkl
(17.80)
10.66 hk
(18.70)
6.66 jkl
(17.80)
9.0 e
(17.87)
48.33 a
(39.81)
49.00 a
(40.09)
49.66 a
(40.36)
50.00 a
(40.09)
49.25 a
(40.09)
Mean
14.29 b
(20.66)
13.69 c
(20.06)
15.02 a
(21.27)
11.78 c
(20.06)
13.69